Author
|
Topic: Intakes- Which is better???
|
gt350mike Journeyman Posts: 12 From: Huntsville, AL Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 02-25-2002 01:11 PM
I'm currently figuring out what type of motor is going to replace my Street Boss in my 66 Mustang (either 347 or 393). The 393 will cost about $800 more so that is a major factor (with my wife, not me). The replacement motor will be 10.5 to 1 to 11 to 1, the cam will be 242 duration @ .050 with a .570 lift. I plan to use Windsor Sr. heads with no mods. My car has a 3.73 gear and weights about 2800. Any sugguestions will be APPPRECIATED!Mike
IP: Logged |
Fastymz Moderator Posts: 18703 From: Reno Nv USA MEM#1240 Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 02-25-2002 02:29 PM
Welcome Mike your sounds like it's going to kick some *** . I like the Edelbrock RPM air gap or just the plain RPM,they make great low-high rpm power and only give up alittle on the top end.That would be my 1st choice for a S/S car. SCOOP
------------------ 65 coupe,351w,RPM intake,Carter625,shorty headers,2.5 exhaust, Flowmasters,C4,open 8" 2:80,Big Boss 429 hood scoop,Crager SS,Black Suede. MEM#1240 https://mustangsandmore.com/ubb/Fastymz.html
IP: Logged |
V8 Thumper Gearhead Posts: 4377 From: Arizona Registered: Dec 2001
|
posted 02-25-2002 02:49 PM
I like (and own) the RPM airgap as well, would recommend it to anyone, but...That stroker (either one you've got in mind) will make enough torque to pull stumps out of the ground, enough to where you may be willing to sacrifice a bit down low. If you stick with the 8.2" deck (347) a Vic Jr. and a short air cleaner would clear your stock hood (right, Alex?). A tall single plane along with those kinda-short gears would pull hard higher up into the RPM range than the dual plane. The taller deck (393) puts you behind the 8 ball in terms of hood clearance unless you want to run a cowl hood. A torker (short single plane) is an option for either motor. I'd say you've got enough cam to run a single plane. Oh hey, welcome to M&M
IP: Logged |
Moneymaker Administrator Posts: 25883 From: Lyons, IL, USA Registered: May 99
|
posted 02-25-2002 04:12 PM
Welcome to M&M ! 347 with those good heads and cam dictates a Victor Jr. and a big carb. ------------------ Alex Denysenko Co-Administrator and Moderator/ non 65-66 Mustang owner sensitivity co-ordinator NHRA/IHRA/SRA member NHRA and IHRA SS/LA National Record Holder '00, '01, & '02 Fleet of FoMoCo products including 88 ASC McLaren Mustang #28 Part time secret agent license #0089 US Class Nationals link
IP: Logged |
n2oMike Gearhead Posts: 2419 From: Spencer, WV Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted 02-25-2002 06:41 PM
Well, nobody seems to be addressing the 347 vs. 393 issue...I'll vote 393! Go for the cubes. The 351W block is WAY stronger than the factory 289-302 unit, plus the 1/2" head bolts make life MUCH easier if you ever decide to slap a nitrous kit on the ole' beast. Nitrous will be pretty much out of the question with a stock block 347 stroker. Ford already stroked the small block the RIGHT way by using a stronger block, longer rods, bigger head bolts, etc. Follow their lead, and add to it a bit to give yourself an unbeatable combination. Add a set of Hooker #6208 1 3/4" swap headers to make it all work. Stroked 351W's can make unholy amounts of power and torque. Top it with a Victor Jr. and a big carb and be happy. Remember, these intakes were designed with the STOCK displacement in mind. Go bigger when selecting carbs/intakes/exhaust for a stroker. I'd recommend a HP950 Holley. (smoothed out 750 sized throttle bores for velocity and a good signal, combined with an 850 baseplate) It's a NICE unit. A company by the name of BIGS also puts out some excellent carbs, and at a good price! http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2001/09/bigs/index.shtml GO FOR THE CUBES!!! Good Luck! ------------------ Mike Burch 66 mustang real street 302 4-speed 289 heads 10.63 @ 129.3 http://www.geocities.com/carbedstangs/cmml_mburch.html http://www.fortunecity.com/silverstone/healey/367 http://www.mustangworks.com/cgi-bin/moi-display.cgi?220
[This message has been edited by n2oMike (edited 02-25-2002).]
IP: Logged |
Moneymaker Administrator Posts: 25883 From: Lyons, IL, USA Registered: May 99
|
posted 02-25-2002 07:40 PM
Yeah but I was thinking that he might be afraid of his wife. ------------------ Alex Denysenko Co-Administrator and Moderator/ non 65-66 Mustang owner sensitivity co-ordinator NHRA/IHRA/SRA member NHRA and IHRA SS/LA National Record Holder '00, '01, & '02 Fleet of FoMoCo products including 88 ASC McLaren Mustang #28 Part time secret agent license #0089 US Class Nationals link
IP: Logged |
chips67 Gearhead Posts: 651 From: louisville, ky, usa Registered: Jul 2001
|
posted 02-25-2002 08:20 PM
THERES A LOCAL YARD WITH A 351W complete....condition unknown, but rebuildable. they're asking $100.....should i get it? ive got a lot of parts on my current 302 that would work on a 351w but im a big time fan of "light = might" rule and since my car wont hook now wouldnt a 351w mke matters worse? how much heavier is that 351w than a 5.0 anyway? one last question....which set of heads is better from the factory....the e7's or the 69-70 model 351w heads?? should i get the 351w? ------------------ 67 coupe, 650dp and rpm intake on 5.0 with afr 165 heads, 4 speed, 4.11's.....best so far is [email protected] in 1/8 mile with 1.79 60ft. time.
IP: Logged |
n2oMike Gearhead Posts: 2419 From: Spencer, WV Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted 02-25-2002 08:38 PM
You should get the 351W IF you've got a good set of heads to feed it with. If you're looking at using the stockers, it won't be worth your trouble. BUT, for $100, it would be a good engine to have for a future project. 351W strokers with BIG heads make insane amounts of power and torque. If it is even remotely in the budget, it's gotta' happen. Those 347's have a way of wearing out fast and using oil. It may even be financially prudent to INVEST in the longer lasting, lower revving, 393ci 351W stroker. Durability is a MAJOR plus with the stronger engine. Chips67, are you REALLY having trouble hooking up with slicks? Are you sure it isn't a bogging problem? I can't get my car to NOT bog with slicks at the dragstrip (no bottle). Good Luck! ------------------ Mike Burch 66 mustang real street 302 4-speed 289 heads 10.63 @ 129.3 http://www.geocities.com/carbedstangs/cmml_mburch.html http://www.fortunecity.com/silverstone/healey/367 http://www.mustangworks.com/cgi-bin/moi-display.cgi?220
IP: Logged |
gt350mike Journeyman Posts: 12 From: Huntsville, AL Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 02-25-2002 11:00 PM
Ok guys....I greatly appreciate your concern for the wrath of my wife! She can't be mean all the time because 3 weeks ago she did her homework and bought me a 7mm Mag for my anniversery present! As far as everyone's reply to the engines, the input is really great. I'm going to start looking for a 351w block in my area to see exactly how much it will cost to build a 393/408. The 347 option is much cheaper because the local speed shop has a complete (new) kit for about $700 cheaper than if I bought it from mailorder. I checked it out today so that make my decision lean towards the 347. The only other question is the flywheels and balancers. Can I use the same off my 302 motor? I know that the 28 oz. is for the early model and the 50 oz. is for late model, but if you buy a stroker kit, which one do you have to use when balancing the assembly???Thanks again for everyone's reply!
IP: Logged |
steve'66 Gearhead Posts: 8826 From: Sonoma,CA,USA Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 02-25-2002 11:17 PM
Mike,You've got a great woman there! I mean a 7mm all on her own, she's a keeper! Anyway back to the engine, the 347 kit is probably a 5.0 deal w/50oz imbalance. Be sure to ask. The 351w will need a bunch of parts you probably don't have like different headers, oil pan, intake, etc. Personally I'd do the 351w deal and don't look back! (actually I already did that) Now looking to stroke it to a 408w, but even that move means all new parts! Figure out what you want before you do it. The stroker needs bigger everything, except for the block. SteveW
IP: Logged |
chips67 Gearhead Posts: 651 From: louisville, ky, usa Registered: Jul 2001
|
posted 02-25-2002 11:48 PM
mike...working on the hook problem this year. the best set of heads id have would be the afr165's on my 5.0 motor right now. they are probably better than the 69 351w heads im sure but they only have 1.90 intake valves. i guess id probably have to get 1 3/4 primary tube headers (im sure this has been discussed that they dont have a long tube header for a 351w in a 67-68 4 speed car) and probably another carb and intake. just wonder what that 351w would crank out with the 165 heads? another set of heads would definetly be out of the budget. besides, wouldnt i have to give up my roller cam? roller lifters for non-roller blocks are stupid high.------------------ 67 coupe, 650dp and rpm intake on 5.0 with afr 165 heads, 4 speed, 4.11's.....best so far is [email protected] in 1/8 mile with 1.79 60ft. time.
IP: Logged |
n2oMike Gearhead Posts: 2419 From: Spencer, WV Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted 02-26-2002 06:30 AM
The headers you need for the 351W swap are Hooker #6208. These are 1 3/4" swap headers for installing the 351W in 65-70 mustangs.As far as installing stock or AFR 165 heads on a 351ci engine, they should be okay, but it's going to be a 'midrange' engine. It will run out of breath around 5500 rpm. A 351W needs larger heads, ESPECIALLY when stroked. Steve 66 does pretty well with a 351W in his 66. He has a very similar Edelbrock head and a solid lifter cam with 236 degrees of intake duration @ 0.050" You guys might benefit from sharing a little info. Good Luck! ------------------ Mike Burch 66 mustang real street 302 4-speed 289 heads 10.63 @ 129.3 http://www.geocities.com/carbedstangs/cmml_mburch.html http://www.fortunecity.com/silverstone/healey/367 http://www.mustangworks.com/cgi-bin/moi-display.cgi?220
IP: Logged |
67Coupster Gearhead Posts: 181 From: Fortson, GA, USA Registered: Oct 2001
|
posted 02-26-2002 01:29 PM
Those Hooker #6208's will work with the 4-speed. That's what I'm using.------------------ James 67 Coupe 393W, AFR 185, 4 Speed, 4.11 9 inch 7.39 @ 96MPH 1/8 1.66 60'
IP: Logged |