Brought to you in part by:

.

Tools & Supplies by Eastwood

  Mustangsandmore Forums
  Ford Racing
  Exhaust Question

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Exhaust Question
65_289
Gearhead

Posts: 184
From:
Registered: Jul 2001

posted 09-30-2001 11:58 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for 65_289   Click Here to Email 65_289     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Ok. We have decided to open up the exhaust. We are thinking about welding in a cut-out right after the collector. But I have a few questions.

1. Would we loose too much torque with open headers?

2. The mufflers are 2-chamber Flowmasters w/ 2 1/4 inch pipes. Could going from a 2.5 inch H-pipe to those mufflers cause a large restriction?

3. Should we ditch the tri-y's? I am not too keen on $300 for hooker super comps if I can avoid it.

I am thinking either we should run open headers at the track and keep the smaller Flowmaster mufflers for the street, or switch to some 2.5 inch Dynomax Ultra-Flow mufflers and pipes and run it through the mufflers at the track.

Thanks!!!

------------------
1965 Coupe, Tremec 3550, Steeda Tri-Ax, Cable Clutch conversion, 3.25 gears, Ford XB3 longblock, x303 heads, B-Cam, 9:1 comp., Ford Racing high-torque starter, Pertronix Ignitor & Flamethrower coil, Accel 8.8mm wires, 650 double pumper, Edelbrock RPM intake, K&N air, Holley electric fuel pump & AFPR, dual 2-chamber Flowmasters, KYB shocks, 5-leaf springs, Chrome Export Brace, Griffen Radiator, Comp. Eng. subs.

IP: Logged

n2oMike
Gearhead

Posts: 322
From: Spencer, WV
Registered: Jan 2001

posted 10-01-2001 06:50 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for n2oMike   Click Here to Email n2oMike     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by 65_289:

1. Would we loose too much torque with open headers?

2. The mufflers are 2-chamber Flowmasters w/ 2 1/4 inch pipes. Could going from a 2.5 inch H-pipe to those mufflers cause a large restriction?

3. Should we ditch the tri-y's? I am not too keen on $300 for hooker super comps if I can avoid it.


#1 If you launch like you mean it, the minimal loss of low-end power will not be an issue.

#2 A buddy of mine picked up a full second in his 351C by switching from manifolds/2.5" exhaust/turbo muffs/2.25" tailpipes to Headers/3" exhaust with turndowns.
The 2.25" tailpipes are choking the engine. If you require tailpipes, 2.5" mandrel bent units from Flowmaster or MAC are your only choice. Don't forget to choose a short muffler to give plenty of room to go up and over the axle.

#3 Hooker Super Comps are the best. They hang down a tad, so I welded a "skid plate" to the bottom of each one for protection. With the way I drive, and the roads around here, it's been a worthwhile addition.
Hooker also makes a regular "Competition" header that is made out of thicker material (longer lasting and more durable) but is a little heavier and since the tubing is thicker, the ID will be "slightly" smaller. Both are 1 5/8" OD. The "Competion" header looks similar to the Super Comp, and is probably the next best thing. Only thing, their advertisement lists them as not fitting World Products heads. (that is a Super Comp only) ...if that is an issue to anyone. These are probably around $120-130 now.

Good Luck!

------------------
Mike Burch
66 mustang real street
302 4-speed 289 heads
10.63 @ 129.3
http://www.geocities.com/carbedstangs/cmml_mburch.html
http://www.fortunecity.com/silverstone/healey/367

[This message has been edited by n2oMike (edited 10-01-2001).]

IP: Logged

65_289
Gearhead

Posts: 184
From:
Registered: Jul 2001

posted 10-01-2001 12:37 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for 65_289   Click Here to Email 65_289     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by n2oMike:
...#2 A buddy of mine picked up a full second in his 351C by switching from manifolds/2.5" exhaust/turbo muffs/2.25" tailpipes to Headers/3" exhaust with turndowns.
The 2.25" tailpipes are choking the engine. If you require tailpipes, 2.5" mandrel bent units from Flowmaster or MAC are your only choice. Don't forget to choose a short muffler to give plenty of room to go up and over the axle...

A full second is a lot of time. But that is a hopped-up 351C that needs to rev high versus my little 302.

IP: Logged

n2oMike
Gearhead

Posts: 322
From: Spencer, WV
Registered: Jan 2001

posted 10-01-2001 01:56 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for n2oMike   Click Here to Email n2oMike     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
You're free to do whatever you want...

It was a 2bbl 351C engine with a 750 vacuum secondary carb, performer intake and unknown hydraulic cam. It was never run over 6k rpm... not exactly a high rpm only screamer.

Just my $0.02 worth of advice. Take it or leave it.

Good Luck!

------------------
Mike Burch
66 mustang real street
302 4-speed 289 heads
10.63 @ 129.3
http://www.geocities.com/carbedstangs/cmml_mburch.html
http://www.fortunecity.com/silverstone/healey/367

IP: Logged

65_289
Gearhead

Posts: 184
From:
Registered: Jul 2001

posted 10-01-2001 01:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for 65_289   Click Here to Email 65_289     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by n2oMike:
You're free to do whatever you want...

It was a 2bbl 351C engine with a 750 vacuum secondary carb, performer intake and unknown hydraulic cam. It was never run over 6k rpm... not exactly a high rpm only screamer.

Just my $0.02 worth of advice. Take it or leave it.

Good Luck!


I appreciate the advice. All I was saying was that the air flow needs of a 351C and a 302 are probably quite different, ergo they need different exhaust set-ups. That's all.

IP: Logged

65_289
Gearhead

Posts: 184
From:
Registered: Jul 2001

posted 10-01-2001 02:37 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for 65_289   Click Here to Email 65_289     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Ok, now I gotta think about it like this. If I run open headers at the track, then I will have to re-jet for the track and re-jet for daily driving.

Would open headers be that much more advantageous than say 2.5 inch pipe all the way back to 2.5 inch Dynomax Ultra-Flows with 2.5 inch turndowns at the axle?

IP: Logged

Fastymz
Gearhead

Posts: 184
From: Reno Nv
Registered: Apr 2001

posted 10-01-2001 04:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Fastymz   Click Here to Email Fastymz     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
On my car with a stock high milage 351w in it.I noticed much more power from the exh,system,which is Shorty hedman hedders, 2.5" mandrel bent pipe with a 2.5" H-pipe and 2.5" three chamber flowmasters and turn downs at the axle.Then when I did the 4bl carter and Rpm edelbrock intake.The exh was the biggest improvement I've done yet.The old system was stock exh manifolds &
1 3/4"pipe no h-pipe and 24"glasspacks to the axle.I say open it up with 2.5" mandrel pipe all the way with 2.5" mufflers and a 2.5" H-pipe.And you can then install some cut outs and the headers so you can open them when or if you want to.

------------------
65 coupe with a stock 1969 351w,RPM intake,carter625cfm,shorty hedmen hedders,black magic electric fan,stock C4,peg leg 8" 2:80,Boss 429 hood scoop,cragers,primer black.

IP: Logged

n2oMike
Gearhead

Posts: 322
From: Spencer, WV
Registered: Jan 2001

posted 10-01-2001 04:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for n2oMike   Click Here to Email n2oMike     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by 65_289:
Ok, now I gotta think about it like this. If I run open headers at the track, then I will have to re-jet for the track and re-jet for daily driving.

Would open headers be that much more advantageous than say 2.5 inch pipe all the way back to 2.5 inch Dynomax Ultra-Flows with 2.5 inch turndowns at the axle?


#1 If your exhaust system isn't very restrictive, the tune for capped vs. uncapped won't be that much different... so different jetting won't really be required.

#2 The best way to determine how much you have to gain by going uncapped, is to just do it. Me believes you are thinking too hard.
To find out how it runs uncapped, just unbolt the exhaust from the collectors and move it over. Then re-connect it with one fastener to the header with the pipes off to the side... no cutouts needed. This is a LOT easier than removing the whole exhaust system. If the exhaust system is fairly restrictive (which yours is) jetting it up a size or two might give the best results.

Good Luck!

------------------
Mike Burch
66 mustang real street
302 4-speed 289 heads
10.63 @ 129.3
http://www.geocities.com/carbedstangs/cmml_mburch.html
http://www.fortunecity.com/silverstone/healey/367

IP: Logged

steve'66
Gearhead

Posts: 2984
From: Sonoma,CA,USA
Registered: Mar 2000

posted 10-01-2001 05:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for steve'66   Click Here to Email steve'66     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by n2oMike:

#2 The best way to determine how much you have to gain by going uncapped, is to just do it. Me believes you are thinking too hard.



Me agrees with Mike!

Try it you'll like it, look Mikey likes it. Stevie likes it too.


SteveW

IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Mustangsandmore Front Page

Copyright 2001, Steve LaRiviere


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47d

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

[About M&M][Acronym Guide][Calendar of Events][Chat Room][Classified Ads] [Links]

[Members' Photos] [Restoration Info][Tech Tips] [ Technical Articles][Ford Technical Data

[ Mustangsandmore.com Bookstore] [Advertise on Mustangsandmore.com] [Mustangsandmore.com T-Shirts]