Author
|
Topic: synthetic oil---any users?
|
71RESTO Gearhead Posts: 1450 From: Oregon, USA Registered: Oct 2000
|
posted 05-11-2001 08:11 AM
I have used the 10w-40 viscosity petroleum based oil my whole life, however a guy I work with absolutely swears by the synthetics. Due to the fact my pick-up has developed a rod knock due to bad lower end lubrication I am thinking of switching over on all my vehicles. I have never used the synthetics before and from what he says, they flow easier, therefore making the lubrication problems less of an isue. Also, my mustangs sit for up to 2 months at a time without being driven, so I'm thinking I may be better off with the synthetic. Any thoughts pro or con are appreciated.------------------ Duane 71 Fastback (under resto) 73 Mach 1 M&M Member #730
IP: Logged |
SteveLaRiviere Administrator Posts: 46005 From: Saco, Maine Registered: May 99
|
posted 05-11-2001 08:36 AM
It is a better lubricant. I'm about to make the switch myself. I've hesitated because I've heard that the downside is that they are more prone to leaking. ------------------ '72 Mustang Sprint Coupe 351C 4V/FMX/4.30 Trac Loc '94 F-150 XL 5.8L/E4OD/3.55 Limited Slip '97 Probe GTS 2.5L DOHC {Wife's car...} All Fords since 1977
IP: Logged |
GTRocks Gearhead Posts: 4370 From: Lusby, MD Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 05-11-2001 09:26 AM
I read an opinion on this here one time that I have never forgotten: No matter how good the oil that you use is, the impurities are still captured by the filter, and it will need changing.I change mine every 3k, so unless you want to pay for synthetic every 3k, I think the benefits of synthetic are minimal due to the filter's limitations. My $.02
IP: Logged |
Clark Gearhead Posts: 735 From: Rowlett,Texas Registered: Aug 99
|
posted 05-11-2001 10:33 AM
Duane, This is always a good question and usually will get quite a few different opinions so here goes mine.There is no doubt that the synthetics are better, a primary reason is because the way it handles heat. Petroleum based oils burn and cause the oil to get that nice dark look. This causes oil coking which is an abrasive and tends to stick to your engine causing the familiar sludge. Bottom line is you can use regular oils and change every 3k which will work fine, but I run synthetics in everything I own, including my lawn mowers and have never had an oil related problem yet. And if I want to run to 5k on my oil there's no concern of the oil being able to handle it, right along with my motorcraft oil filter which will last longer if the oil stays cleaner. ------------------ 69 351W Sportsroof Deluxe [This message has been edited by Clark (edited 05-11-2001).] [This message has been edited by Clark (edited 05-11-2001).]
IP: Logged |
steve'66 Gearhead Posts: 9555 From: Sonoma,CA,USA Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 05-11-2001 12:16 PM
I just tried Mobil 1 in the 351w last oil change. Wanted to wait for the engine to break-in, it should be good for a couple extra hp. No leaks so far. SteveW
IP: Logged |
KenB Journeyman Posts: 44 From: Regina, Sk, Canada Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 05-11-2001 01:19 PM
I run Castrol Syntec 0-50 in my three vehicles: 95 Cougar, 69 Cougar with 351C and Dodge Power Wagon with 440. I noticed that the 351C turned over easier when shut off for about 10 minutes - thus I'd say its better than the 15-40 I was using. I run longer between changes with the synthetic thus cost for oil changes is the same (more money but longer intervals). For me I really like the 0-50 since I can run it all year round, makes a big difference during winter starting. Never noticed any issues such as oil leaks etc but then the synthetic oil I am using is actually thicker than the conventional oil I used due to the 50 weight factor.I now only use regular oils for break-in, synthetic after that.
IP: Logged |
SteveLaRiviere Administrator Posts: 46005 From: Saco, Maine Registered: May 99
|
posted 05-11-2001 01:22 PM
quote: Originally posted by GTRocks: I read an opinion on this here one time that I have never forgotten: No matter how good the oil that you use is, the impurities are still captured by the filter, and it will need changing.I change mine every 3k, so unless you want to pay for synthetic every 3k, I think the benefits of synthetic are minimal due to the filter's limitations. My $.02
That was another thing that bothered me; if you leave the oil in for extended periods, you are building up lots of grit and acids. {a byproduct of combustion} If I switch to synthetic, I will still change the oil at the same intervals. Just yesterday, I got the part number to a silicone sealer that supposedly holds up to synthetic oils. An engine builder in my area that builds lots of stock car engines had a real hard time getting his motors to seal until a GM engineer told him to use GE RTV100 sealer. He claims this stuff stopped the leaking problem 100% Unfortunately, he says this stuff is hard to come by and you have to buy it by the case in caulking tubes. I'm going to see if that's true. ------------------ '72 Mustang Sprint Coupe 351C 4V/FMX/4.30 Trac Loc '94 F-150 XL 5.8L/E4OD/3.55 Limited Slip '97 Probe GTS 2.5L DOHC {Wife's car...} All Fords since 1977
IP: Logged |
kid vishus Gearhead Posts: 6617 From: middle of NC Registered: Oct 2000
|
posted 05-11-2001 05:39 PM
I run synthetics in vehicles. Leaks are not a problem even in the race motor using 5W-20 if the motor is sealed properly using normal red and orange Permatex. I change the Mobil 1 synthetic in my wife's T-bird every 5 miles. I would go a little longer but it sees a lot of town driving. The same goes for my Lightning. The bearings in my race motor look better now using the synthetic Royal Purple than they ever looked using conventional oil, and I have not had a bearing failure since I switched to synthetic. I will not use a petroluem based oil in a race motor ever again.
IP: Logged |
Ryan Wilke Gearhead Posts: 2514 From: Stanton, Michigan 49707 Registered: Oct 2000
|
posted 05-11-2001 06:44 PM
OK - I'll throw in my 2 cents..... I think for an engine that may set for a week at a time, the synthetics are worth there extra cost. The 'cling' of most synthetics is way better than a petro lube. So rather than rollover an engine (or trans or rearend) that has dripped & drained for a week or more and doesn't even have a visiable lube film on the parts any longer, personally, I'm more comfortable using a synthetic in them. Same goes for the vehicles that see extreme conditions (racing or pulling heavy loads), due to synthetics ability to handle more extreme conditions than petro lubes. Now; daily drivers don't set long enough to drain off the oil film and are high-milers, so I use petro lubes in my commuter. Just for what it's worth.... Ryan
IP: Logged |
65coupei6 Gearhead Posts: 452 From: S.F., CA Registered: May 2000
|
posted 05-11-2001 07:54 PM
I am glad this topic came up. I am about to change to syth. oil. Can you just drain your oil and switch or should you add syth. oil slowly during oil changes. Also what is the best weight to use. I am using 10-30 regular oil now. So should I use 10-30 syth. oil also?
IP: Logged |
richard bohm Gearhead Posts: 373 From: tucson,az-luray,va Registered: May 2001
|
posted 05-12-2001 03:38 AM
when switching to synthetic oil you just change over and be done with it. synthetic oils lubricate better, have lower pumping losses(which accounts for better fuel economy), and runn cooler than conventional oils. if you dont want to pay the price of a full synthetic, you can save money and get most of the benefits by switching to a semi-synthetic. the leaking problems some people have had are caused by the oils tendency to clean the inside of the engine quite aggressively. what actually happens is the leak was there in the first place but because the old oil laid down deposits at the site of the leak the leak was "sealed". now when you switch to synthetic the old deposits are cleared away and you have the leak again. a semi-synthetics does not clean as aggresively as a full synthetic so oyu dont have the "leak problem". i use a semi or a full synthetic in my grand marquis, and when i finaly get them on the road i will use full synthetics in my mustang and falcon. 10w-30 is the weight i would recomend for older cars, and for newer ones(after say 1985) i would go with what the manufacturer recomends.
IP: Logged |
69maverick Moderator Posts: 1503 From: Thomaston,CT. Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted 05-12-2001 08:45 AM
I started using an oil called Speed-sport from a Co. named DA lube. Its a syn-blend. Red-line would be my 1st.choice but I get this stuff at cost from my Company! And for filters I only use Baldwin or Wix Filters. They both filter to 5 microns!! The best 10 dollar K & N is only good to 10 Microns!!But I really feel the Syn-blend is the way to go right now. Full synthetic is very cosly and like Steve said you need to change it anyway.even if you only put low miles on.
IP: Logged |
74merc Gearhead Posts: 1307 From: Demopolis AL Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 05-12-2001 05:27 PM
quote: Originally posted by kid vishus: I change the Mobil 1 synthetic in my wife's T-bird every 5 miles. I would go a little longer but it sees a lot of town driving.
alot of hard runs in those 5 miles? mind sending me some of the $$ you spend on oil? lol
IP: Logged |
kid vishus Gearhead Posts: 6617 From: middle of NC Registered: Oct 2000
|
posted 05-13-2001 10:10 AM
quote: Originally posted by 74merc: alot of hard runs in those [b]5 miles? mind sending me some of the $$ you spend on oil? lol[/B]
OOPS!! I meant every 5K miles. It's been a long week.
IP: Logged |
tempo1993 Gearhead Posts: 583 From: CT, the home of high taxes Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 05-13-2001 10:39 AM
Howdy here in the classics OK, just my $.02, but, the reason I don't use synthetic is, it's pretty much worthless when the engine is cold. The good thing about petrolium based oil is it sticks to everything in the engine, weather or not it is hot or cold. Synthetic on the otherhand is attracted to heat, and will only stick to parts when they're hot. That's the only reason I avoid it, I've tryed it in a couple of cars, including my 84 F-150 and 79 LeSaber bracketracer, both of which ended up NOT liking the synthetic. Switched back to 20-40 in the truck and 10-30 in the car, and never had a problem. You could head ticking and sometimes a nice grinding before the car warmed up :\ So I'm really not a but fan of synthetic personally. ~Scott~
IP: Logged |
Fastback68 Gearhead Posts: 3996 From: Sucat, Paranaque, Philippines Registered: Jul 99
|
posted 05-14-2001 04:38 AM
It seems to me that Ryan and Scott are disagreeing on an important point. Ryan says : "I think for an engine that may set for a week at a time, the synthetics are worth there extra cost. The 'cling' of most synthetics is way better than a petro lube. So rather than rollover an engine (or trans or rearend) that has dripped & drained for a week or more and doesn't even have a visiable lube film on the parts any longer, personally, I'm more comfortable using a synthetic in them." But Scott says: "OK, just my $.02, but, the reason I don't use synthetic is, it's pretty much worthless when the engine is cold. The good thing about petrolium based oil is it sticks to everything in the engine, weather or not it is hot or cold. Synthetic on the otherhand is attracted to heat, and will only stick to parts when they're hot." Hmm, who's right? I was totally sold on making the switch until Scott's 2 cents came along. Simon[This message has been edited by Fastback68 (edited 05-14-2001).]
IP: Logged |
richard bohm Gearhead Posts: 373 From: tucson,az-luray,va Registered: May 2001
|
posted 05-14-2001 05:03 AM
ultimately it comes down to personel preference. my opinion is synthetics are the way to go. they pump easier, have better film strength,and they will flow when non-synthetics are still a mass of jello in the pan. as far as brands go pennzoil, quaker state, castrol, valvoline, royal purple, and mobil 1 seem to be the brands of choice. i have used all but the royal purple and have liked each one. i have also used them in a variety of vehicles including an 84 tbird v-6, an 84 F-250 6.9 diesel, an 83 grand marquis 5.0, a 79 fairmont 5.0, and a 70 falcon (like a 69). i have had no problems with any of these vehicles. in fact on all except the truck and, oddly enough, the falcon, my fuel economy improved from just over 1 mpg(the grand marquis) to over 5 mpg(the tbird). all these engines also were in various states of wear. i believe firmly that a couple of them did not expire because i switched. just my opinion.
IP: Logged |
69maverick Moderator Posts: 1503 From: Thomaston,CT. Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted 05-14-2001 09:54 AM
Guys!! Guys!! Synthetic-Blend !!You get the best of both worlds. Lower price and better lubrication! Theres alot more to oil than I can tell you but the only oil Maker in the U.S. That sells oil thats drilled in the U.S. IS DA Lube. Its a hard base polimer oil All other suppliers use soft based oil. Did anyone notice that years ago people changed there oil every 20-30k weather it needed it or not!! The motors where not any better but the oil was. The government has made the oil producers take many of the best lubricating properties out of the oil to save the enviroment! But if they pay a permit fee they can put it in!! So this is one of the reasons the synthetics are so high!
IP: Logged |
tempo1993 Gearhead Posts: 583 From: CT, the home of high taxes Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 05-14-2001 11:58 AM
I agree with 69mav, blend is the way to go, you have the cold startup protection of a petro based oil, and the highheat protection of a synthetic. I just got my certification from Valvoline a couple weeks ago, that's the only reason I gave my opinion I've also run Mobile 1 in my old LeSaber, and it caused me nothing but trouble, so if you do use or choose to use synthetic, avoid mobile one, cause I'm not the only person I've hear of having a problem with it(a guy I goto school with blew the engine in his Jeep, and swears it was the mobile one in it that did it)I recommend a blend, or petro, not a big fan of straigh synthetics. I could see for racing purposes running synthetic would be better due to high stress high heat situations, but if you're going to stay on the street, go for a blend or a straight petro ~Scott~
IP: Logged |
Jimmy Ray Gearhead Posts: 133 From: Virginia Beach Va. Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 05-14-2001 04:56 PM
I use the petroleum based oil out of habit and also the cost. But my Crate motor I put in my Truck has to have Mobel 1 or X's out the warrenty. Along time ago a friend of mine sold AMS Oil and he swore by it, But the price was to high. But he had fix for that, a reusable filters. They are cleanable just like Aircraft filters are. The thought was that you would never need to change the oil just clean the filters and add one quart due to loss from the filter removal/cleaning. But again the Price was more than I was willing to pay. The filter was like $150.00 20 years ago. By the way all Naval aircraft use synthetic. And we never change the oil, just filters on hourly inspections. That way we can take samples of the oil and tend the engine wear. It's called Naval Oil Analysis Program, NOAP for short. An T-56 from from an E-2C runs at a constant RPM of 1106 with a maxuim turbine inlet temp of 1077 for a old -425 engine and the synthetics hold up much better than Petroleum based oil. So I think synthetics are better but I not willing to pay the price. Jimmy Ray 01 Bullitt 1007 73 Mach1 351CJ 67 Fastback Maintenance Master Chief VF-101 in NAS Oceana
IP: Logged |
seaweed Gearhead Posts: 141 From: MA. Registered: Dec 2000
|
posted 05-14-2001 05:00 PM
I would like to here what Alex says about this topic.---What does he use in his engines on the drag strip---street??
IP: Logged |
Ryan Wilke Gearhead Posts: 2514 From: Stanton, Michigan 49707 Registered: Oct 2000
|
posted 05-14-2001 05:33 PM
Hey Guys, Over on M&Ms, "Ford Racing", 'N20Mike' recently provided the web site that has some interesting views and comparisions of oil filters & types of oil. Check it out at:http://members.nbci.com/_XOOM/minimopar/ then click on: "Tech Data" then scrowl down to: "Engine" then click on: "Oil Filter Study" or "Oil Choices" Later,,, Ryan
IP: Logged |
steve'66 Gearhead Posts: 9555 From: Sonoma,CA,USA Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 05-14-2001 05:51 PM
quote: Originally posted by seaweed: I would like to here what Alex says about this topic.---What does he use in his engines on the drag strip---street??
This was done before in December. Check it out, https://mustangsandmore.com/ubb/Archives/Archive-000022/HTML/20001224-1-002880.html SteveW
IP: Logged |
Moneymaker Administrator Posts: 27660 From: Lyons, IL, USA Registered: May 99
|
posted 05-14-2001 06:20 PM
Royal Purple. None better! No brag, just fact! ------------------ Alex Denysenko Co-Administrator and Moderator NHRA/IHRA/SRA member Fleet of FoMoCo products Moneymaker Bio US Class Nationals link
IP: Logged |
tempo1993 Gearhead Posts: 583 From: CT, the home of high taxes Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 05-14-2001 06:26 PM
Oh yeah, I missed one thing, if the engine COMES WITH synthetic, then tat's what the engine is made for, I know Benz and Porche do this, and the parts are different in some way(I'll get back to ya when I remember how) ~Scott~
IP: Logged |
71Mach1 Gearhead Posts: 216 From: new jersey Registered: Aug 99
|
posted 05-14-2001 07:20 PM
Can Royal Purple be used in street driven cars? I recall someone telling me that it didn't have certain additives needed for regular street driving, don't remember what they were.
IP: Logged |
Moneymaker Administrator Posts: 27660 From: Lyons, IL, USA Registered: May 99
|
posted 05-14-2001 09:33 PM
Royal Purple makes lubricants for anything that needs to be lubed! You can go to their website and look at their recomendations/applications for street driven cars. Their race oils are formulated just for that, RACING, but their street/performance and industrial stuff has all of the great properties and qualities associated with the racing oils. ------------------ Alex Denysenko Co-Administrator and Moderator NHRA/IHRA/SRA member Fleet of FoMoCo products Moneymaker Bio US Class Nationals link
IP: Logged |
horseballz Gearhead Posts: 294 From: LasVegas,NV Registered: Dec 99
|
posted 05-15-2001 02:38 PM
Hey Guys, What about the concept of using synthetic, but spinning on a new filter every 2K or 3K miles? This seems that it would be a good way to take advantage of the longer life of the synth. oil while getting rid of the contaminants. Alex, what do you think? (((((((((((((((( Gene------------------ 68 coupe 289/3speed(soon to be 5.0/5speed) 68 Coupe 289 C4
IP: Logged |
69maverick Moderator Posts: 1503 From: Thomaston,CT. Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted 05-16-2001 07:12 AM
After further review I would have to say in my opinion that the synthetics are the way to go! But if you wanted to save a few bucks you could blend them yourself! I was thinking 3quarts syn.-2 quarts regular oil. of the same brand!! And the filter I will use from this point on will be the Motorcraft fl-1a . This filter seems to be one of the best for the money! The Wix,napa gold,Baldwin,puralator plus are all right in there.
IP: Logged |
74merc Gearhead Posts: 1307 From: Demopolis AL Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 05-16-2001 09:38 AM
quote: Originally posted by horseballz: Hey Guys, What about the concept of using synthetic, but spinning on a new filter every 2K or 3K miles? This seems that it would be a good way to take advantage of the longer life of the synth. oil while getting rid of the contaminants. Alex, what do you think? (((((((((((((((( Gene
the major contaminants you need to worry about aren't particles, thats what the filter is there for. the problem is the oil becomes acidic due to the combustion and blowby. it loses its ability to lubricate, its consistancy and its adheasiveness(sp).
IP: Logged |
joe Gearhead Posts: 522 From: Los Angeles Registered: Feb 2001
|
posted 05-16-2001 12:38 PM
This is at best a five year old study but I recall, I think it was Consumer Report, that tested every kind of oil out there, including syn. and when they went to open the engines to check for wear, there were no signs that the syn. stuff protected any better. Like I said this is an old study and might no longer be accurate. Myself being on a student budget, use reg. oil.
IP: Logged |
jkilroy Gearhead Posts: 1808 From: Vicksburg, MS Registered: Dec 99
|
posted 05-16-2001 06:21 PM
The one topic that will ALWAYS draw a crowd!Before I get started I use both, 10-30 in the 68, change at 3000 and Mobile 1 in the 98, and change it at 7500. but... I used to work in a heavy equipment shop and we maintained, among other things, a fleet of 20 or so stretch vans. They used AMSOIL and the neat filter that they make. That combo is fantastic if you have the under hood room. We would put 100,000 a year on those vans and the only oil that ever got changed was the stuff you had to replace when you changed the filter. We changed the primary filter every 7500 to 10,000 and the secondary filter every 20,000. After 100,000 miles the stuff still looked brand new. We did have a guy over heat one on the way back from New Orleans after loosing a hose and when we tore the motor down it was spotless. As apposed to the boss who had a olds "cut-less" company car and he swore by Quaker State. We change that junk every 3000 miles and at 60,000 he broke a timing chain. When we took it apart I could not believe the amount of black tar like sludge. You couldn't tell what was what that crap was so thick! We also used one of those industrial oil analyzer companies for everything, let me tell you, worth every penny. (You don't want to tear down a 15,000 cubic inch diesel unless you have to, trust me on this) Those vans never had problems. We didn't use the Amsoil in the diesels cause the boss made us use diesel stuff, I believe Rotella T, but I bet they would have lasted a lot longer if we had. Like I said, I use both, but I have seen many cases where heavily used motors looked brand new inside after over 100,000 miles without EVER changing the oil, except for what you lost when you did a filter change. ------------------ Jay Kilroy 68' Fastback GT 390 "No such thing as a cam thats too big"
IP: Logged |
65coupei6 Gearhead Posts: 452 From: S.F., CA Registered: May 2000
|
posted 05-17-2001 03:56 PM
I am glad this post popped up. I was about to change my oil anyways. I went out and got some Royal Purpul for $4.61 a quart. Well see how it goes.
IP: Logged |
Ryan Wilke Gearhead Posts: 2514 From: Stanton, Michigan 49707 Registered: Oct 2000
|
posted 05-17-2001 04:49 PM
Dang Jay! ..a 15,000 cubic-inch diesel.. ??!! That's one big mo-fo power-maker !!
IP: Logged |