Author
|
Topic: What engine is in a '95 V-6 Stang?
|
steve'66 Gearhead Posts: 8908 From: Sonoma,CA,USA Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 11-29-2002 08:33 PM
And what other cars/trucks used this engine?Thanks! SteveW
IP: Logged |
IIGood Moderator Posts: 3484 From: Arnold, MD, USA Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 11-29-2002 09:39 PM
It's a 3.8L, 232 cid engine. I don't know what all other vehicles use it, but I'm pretty sure the T-bird uses the same one. I think *maybe* Rangers used them too, but don't hold me to that.I can't think of too many other RWD cars Ford has/had that used a 3.8L. ------------------ Frank S.----MCA Member 40390 '99 Mustang coupe '77 Ghia--"II Good" '76 Cobra--project
IP: Logged |
steve'66 Gearhead Posts: 8908 From: Sonoma,CA,USA Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 11-29-2002 11:48 PM
Frank,Thanks, Melissa toasted her's Thursday on her way to Reno for Thanksgiving. We're gonna take the trailer and pick it up in the morning. Hopefully it isn't too bad, but it started pinging on the freeway and she noticed the temp gauge was pegged. After cooling it down to the middle of the temp range with fresh water it still had "funny sounds and slimy stuff in the water". Doesn't sound good to me, but I'll update you tomorrow. SteveW
IP: Logged |
IIGood Moderator Posts: 3484 From: Arnold, MD, USA Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 11-30-2002 01:14 AM
Were the head gaskets ever replaced on that?The '94 and '95 V6s were NOTORIOUS for blowing head gaskets. A TSB was even issued for this problem. Not just the Mustang either, I think every 3.8 Ford made in that era got it...I read somewhere that it was the fact the heads had too many holes in it for the water passages, so it made the gasket too thin in some spots. This is definitely a big problem to watch out for on those pre-1996 3.8s. ------------------ Frank S.----MCA Member 40390 '99 Mustang coupe '77 Ghia--"II Good" '76 Cobra--project
IP: Logged |
steve'66 Gearhead Posts: 8908 From: Sonoma,CA,USA Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 11-30-2002 07:00 PM
Frank,Yeah the previous owner changed head gaskets at abt 60,000 miles. It survived the overheating problem this time! All looks good, fresh coolant and an oil change and we're back in business. Thanks, SteveW
IP: Logged |
SteveLaRiviere Administrator Posts: 43395 From: Saco, Maine Registered: May 99
|
posted 11-30-2002 07:14 PM
Steve, I don't know if this helps you:Ford extends engine warranty to include rear wheel drive 3.8L V6 models published: 26 April 2000 date of revision: none In the interest of customer satisfaction, Ford Motor Company is expanding a previously announced extended warranty on 1994 and 1995 3.8L V-6 engine head gaskets to also cover rear-wheel drive cars powered by this engine. Now, the 1994 and 1995 Ford Thunderbird and Mustang, and Mercury Cougar, with the 3.8L engine will also be covered for head gasket failure for 7 years or 100,000 miles,whichever comes first. Chris Jenson from the Plain Dealer has published numerous articles on the failure of the 3.8L's head gaskets. One Ford employee even refused a free computer from Ford until Ford Motor Company fixed the 3.8L's to the customer' satisfaction. On Feb. 25, Ford announced that it was extending the head gasket warranty on front-wheel drive versions of this engine for these two model years, which included the 1994 Lincoln Continental, 1994 and 1995 Ford Taurus and Mercury Sable, and the 1995 Ford Windstar. "While we have addressed head gasket failures in 1994 and 1995 front-wheel drive vehicles with the 3.8L engine, we have become aware that owners of 1994 and 1995 rear-wheel drive vehicles with these engines are also having failures," said Ann O'Neill, director, vehicle service and programs, Ford Customer Service Division. "We have looked at the data, listened to our customers, and have decided to include these vehicles in the warranty extension as well, because customer satisfaction is our number one priority." In fact, Ford Motor Company has been target of numerous web sites questioning Ford's commitment to customer satisfaction (See "Consumers turn web into weapon" by Mark Truby, Detroit News) and that's publicity Ford clearly acknowledges it does not want. Owners of these vehicles who experienced head gasket failures during the 7 year/100,000 time frame will be eligible for a full refund for past repairs, or may choose a $4,000 certificate to be used towards the purchase or lease of a new Ford, Mercury or Lincoln. Vehicle owners will receive a communication from Ford via first-class mail in May explaining the warranty extension. BlueOvalNews.com ------------------ '70 Mustang Mach 1 - '72 Mustang Sprint - '94 F-150 Be sure to remember our sponsors, Mustangs Plus, NPD, and Osborn Reproductions.
IP: Logged |
steve'66 Gearhead Posts: 8908 From: Sonoma,CA,USA Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 11-30-2002 07:53 PM
Thanks Steve!It's probably a little late for this '95 but good info. If it needs head gaskets I'm up for it. SteveW
IP: Logged |
mustangs68 Moderator Posts: 22551 From: Buckroe Beach Va MCA#39406 M&M #12 Member Mustang Club of Tidewater Registered: May 99
|
posted 12-01-2002 10:51 AM
And don't forget to check the heads..The sons '95 V6 had some "warpage" and need a couple thou taken off...which didn't hurt the compression any either and while your under the hood..on that '95 V6 do you have (factory)tublar exhaust headers or cast exhast manifold?
IP: Logged |
IIGood Moderator Posts: 3484 From: Arnold, MD, USA Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 12-01-2002 07:15 PM
Sam, if I remember correctly from discussions on other V6 boards, it wasn't until the late '90s, probably not till the '99, that the 3.8 got manifolds.I could be wrong and flipping my facts, but I do know my '99 has manifolds. ------------------ Frank S.----MCA Member 40390 '99 Mustang coupe '77 Ghia--"II Good" '76 Cobra--project
IP: Logged |
steve'66 Gearhead Posts: 8908 From: Sonoma,CA,USA Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 12-01-2002 11:00 PM
quote: Originally posted by mustangs68: do you have (factory)tublar exhaust headers or cast exhast manifold?
Sam, It's got tubular exhaust manifolds. SteveW
IP: Logged |
kcode Gearhead Posts: 3074 From: alvaton,ky,usa Suburb of Bowling Green, M&M #79, MCA #29208 Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 12-01-2002 11:10 PM
I wonder if Fords extension will cover a 96 Explorer with a 4.0 V-6 pushrod motor with two leaking head gaskets, both banks, but with 135,000 miles Mike
IP: Logged |
mustangs68 Moderator Posts: 22551 From: Buckroe Beach Va MCA#39406 M&M #12 Member Mustang Club of Tidewater Registered: May 99
|
posted 12-17-2002 07:28 PM
sorry for the delay in reply.There were some SVT V6 engines that got "loose" on the production line.Some reported that the V6 Mustangs with Tubular exhaust Headers with 5 speeds were them however this isn't a sure fired why to prove it is a SVT V6.. The Dealership we bought ours (one 95 vert & one coupe) from was the 1st one to notice the difference in the Son 95 V6,sound different.idled different and was "stronger" that a "regular V6"..thus they proclaimed to me this was a SVT V6. I didn't really pay much attention to this until I read reports of them in Mustang Times and Monthly and it seems to bear out that there are some SVT V6's out there. sam
IP: Logged |
steve'66 Gearhead Posts: 8908 From: Sonoma,CA,USA Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 12-17-2002 07:48 PM
Sam,This is a '95 5 speed car with tubular headers. Who knows? I do know the head gaskets failed twice in 77,000 miles. When we were buying the car Alex's comment was "hope you like changing head gaskets". I should'a listened better. SteveW
IP: Logged |