Brought to you in part by:


NOTICE! The old is a read-only archive.
Currently the Search function is inoperative, but we are working on the problem.

Please join us at our NEW forums located at this location.
Please notice this is a brand new message board, and you must re-register to gain access.

  Mustangsandmore Forum Archive
  '79 to '93 -- The Fox Mustang
  Cleveland intake comparison

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Cleveland intake comparison

Posts: 29
From: Belgrade, MT, 59714, USA
Registered: Aug 2004

posted 10-28-2004 02:43 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for oddrodtodd        Reply w/Quote
I'm slowly gathering parts for my "Cleveland in a FOX" project. I've got a couple of stock '70 cast iron 4bbl. intakes, one of which I was thinking of running to save money on the project. It's difficult to find good comparison data on intakes since the magazines' basically stopped doing much with these engines 20 years ago. That and little research has been put into STREET intake design for this engine in recent years. The excellent Blue Thunder intake is too tall and costly for my budget, and realistically a little North of my RPM range, even though it IS a dual-plane.
I will be running closed chamber quench 4V heads and flat-tops. 1 7/8" Headman Huslers, a Crane Hi-Intensity cam (.506/.519 lift,.224/232 degrees @.05 lift, 112 lobe centers, 2500-5500 RPM), 750 CFM mech. secondary Holley and a T-5 trans.
My questions are: Does the stock intake have any upper-end RPM advantage over the Edelbrock F-351 4V or Performer 4V intake? I know they designed this intake to increase velocity in the lower RPM range. Does it do that at the expense of midrange HP? Any objective information would be appreciated. Since this car needs to handle, the 30lb. weight savings would also be appreciated!
Thanks, Todd

Todd & Judy Noel
'74 Pinto-302
'86 Mustang GT 5.0
'76 F250-460 Trailering Special

[This message has been edited by oddrodtodd (edited 10-28-2004).]


Posts: 29200
From: Lyons, IL, USA
Registered: May 99

posted 10-30-2004 09:29 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Moneymaker        Reply w/Quote
Either aluminum intake would be an improvement over the stock iron unit.
Your best running factory stock 351C engines used a 180 aluminum intake and similar Holley carb.
351HO and CJ.

Alex Denysenko
Co-Administrator and Moderator

NHRA/IHRA/SRA member and licensed Superstock driver
MCA member# 53321
NHRA and IHRA SS/LA & SS/MA National Record Holder '00,'01,'02,'03,& '04
First SS/MA in the TENS!
IHRA division 5 Superstock Champion
Fleet of FoMoCo products including 88 ASC McLaren Mustang #28

The Barry of BarrysGrrl

Quote #1: "I never met a magazine mechanic I liked."
Quote #2: "Make sure brain is in gear before engaging mouth!"
Quote #3: "If you can't run with the big dogs, stay on the porch!"

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Mustangsandmore Front Page

Copyright 2006, Steve LaRiviere. All Rights Reserved.

Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47d

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

[Members' Pics]

[Tech Articles]