Brought to you in part by:

.


NOTICE! The old Mustangsandmore.com is a read-only archive.
Currently the Search function is inoperative, but we are working on the problem.

Please join us at our NEW Mustangsandmore.com forums located at this location.
Please notice this is a brand new message board, and you must re-register to gain access.

  Mustangsandmore Forum Archive
  Ford Racing
  chassis reinforcement kit from MP?

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   chassis reinforcement kit from MP?
stangbanger67
Journeyman

Posts: 15
From: orange, MA USA
Registered: Jul 2006

posted 07-10-2006 03:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for stangbanger67        Reply w/Quote
anyone have any feedback on these? Is it worth it or would subframe connectors be enough for a street/strip car? I have a 67 coupe http://www.mustangsplus.com/tech/chassis/index.html

SkinnyMan
Gearhead

Posts: 916
From: Tupelo, MS - USA (CA temporarily)
Registered: Jan 2005

posted 07-10-2006 06:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SkinnyMan        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by stangbanger67:
anyone have any feedback on these? Is it worth it or would subframe connectors be enough for a street/strip car? I have a 67 coupe

Don't have the foggiest about the subframe connectors, but WELCOME to M&M.

Someone who has more knowledge than I will be along shortly.

------------------
SkinnyMan
Tupelo, MS

Thank you, Thank you very much!

68 Coop
Gearhead

Posts: 5847
From: Mesquite, NV. 89027
Registered: Oct 2004

posted 07-10-2006 06:41 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for 68 Coop        Reply w/Quote
I think weld-in sub-frame connectors are a GREAT idea. That project seems like a lot of work and overkill for a daily driver.

------------------
William
M&M# 4256
MCA# 64831

"Objects in mirror may mean they are losing".

68 Coupe
289
C4
3:55's/Trac-Lok

JAAZZY
Gearhead

Posts: 918
From: Bay Area, CA
Registered: Apr 2001

posted 07-10-2006 08:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for JAAZZY        Reply w/Quote
If you are doing a frame up build I would say go ahead. If not that is going to cost a lot of money. I have sub frame connectors and it feels pretty stout to me. I would think these mods are more useful for a built up convertible.

Darryl Eichenlaub
Gearhead

Posts: 124
From: Buckley,Wa.
Registered: Dec 2005

posted 07-11-2006 01:37 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Darryl Eichenlaub        Reply w/Quote
Welcome, I agree with Jaazzy this mod would work better for a convertible. This kit looks to stiffen the whole chassis but don't really tie in the rear subframe. For a street/strip car subframe connectors would work better. I used weld-in connectors from Tinman Fabrication and I'm happy with what it did. They are a solid heavy piece, if you are going with more of a strip car you might not want all that weight.

------------------
Darryl Eichenlaub
1965 Mustang Coupe restomod 289,c4,body and interior mods.
1956 F-100 460,c6,9" major body mods, on going project.
1967 Mustang Fastback, father/son project 5.0,5spd,9".
1975 F250 4x4 Highboy 390,4spd,35",custom paint.
2002 Mustang v6,5spd, daughters college ride.
2001 Ford Escape, Wifes grocery getter.

[This message has been edited by Darryl Eichenlaub (edited 07-11-2006).]

stangbanger67
Journeyman

Posts: 15
From: orange, MA USA
Registered: Jul 2006

posted 07-11-2006 08:34 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for stangbanger67        Reply w/Quote
Thanks for the warm welcome. Since I've found this site I havent been able to tear myself away-alot of great info here. I have a 67 coupe that was my fathers. It was given to me as a graduation gift back in '93( dont be envious- it wasnt in that great of shape ha ha ) over the years the project has always taken the back burner to other things (house , kids ) Now I'm ready to get after her again. The car needs alot of work but the sentimental value is why I've held on to her all this time. I remember dad dustin off firebirds and camaros with it back when he owned it! Ha HA

MidLifCrisis
Gearhead

Posts: 673
From: Frederick County, MD
Registered: Oct 2001

posted 07-11-2006 10:42 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for MidLifCrisis        Reply w/Quote
" I remember dad dustin off firebirds and camaros with it back when he owned it! Ha HA"


So am I correct to guess you have a 390 in your '67?

Welcome to the best and most infomative site on the web. I agree with the other guys. If you a doing a mild restoration, then don't bother with subframe connectors, but if it is a convertible or you decide to build a monster motor for it, then by all means you will feel the difference. Charlie

stangbanger67
Journeyman

Posts: 15
From: orange, MA USA
Registered: Jul 2006

posted 07-12-2006 10:08 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for stangbanger67        Reply w/Quote
No actually its a 289!!! Thats what was great about it. Those mid 80's F-bodys never knew what hit em. It had a holley 600 an old school weiend? intake manifold , headers and a shift kit in the c-4 tranny. He bought the car this way so we were never really sure what it had in it.Years later when I tore it down, I discovered the block had been punched .30 over w/ flat tops the cam was stamped " LUNATI 280 " on the end and the thing had 4.11 gears in the 8"!!!! All this in a lime gold coupe w/blacked out 14 "steel wheels w/ chrome trim rings and teeny 215/70 tires, lol The car DEFINED the word SLEEPER!!!it was awesome

[This message has been edited by stangbanger67 (edited 07-12-2006).]

Blacksmith
Gearhead

Posts: 604
From: Front Royal, Va., USA
Registered: Feb 2006

posted 07-13-2006 12:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Blacksmith        Reply w/Quote
Welcome to M&M, THE BEST Mustang Forum there is!!!
That system looks like WAY TOO MUCH $$ and work to install.
Maier Racing has a pretty good looking set of sub frame connectors that bolt in at multiple locations, both front and back (stiffer than most out there that only attach at one place each end) & could probably be welded in to/instead.
I've been leaning towards them for my GT350H clone for street cruising and occasional open track stuff.

------------------
66 GT350H clone
302, Holley 600, Tri-Y headers, Flowmasters, power front disc brakes.

MidLifCrisis
Gearhead

Posts: 673
From: Frederick County, MD
Registered: Oct 2001

posted 07-13-2006 08:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for MidLifCrisis        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by stangbanger67:
No actually its a 289!!! Thats what was great about it. Those mid 80's F-bodys never knew what hit em. It had a holley 600 an old school weiend? intake manifold , headers and a shift kit in the c-4 tranny. He bought the car this way so we were never really sure what it had in it.Years later when I tore it down, I discovered the block had been punched .30 over w/ flat tops the cam was stamped " LUNATI 280 " on the end and the thing had 4.11 gears in the 8"!!!! All this in a lime gold coupe w/blacked out 14 "steel wheels w/ chrome trim rings and teeny 215/70 tires, lol The car DEFINED the word SLEEPER!!!it was awesome

[This message has been edited by stangbanger67 (edited 07-12-2006).]


Love those small blocks. I remember seeing my first Shelby. The guy rolls into the show with a '65 GT-350 with the glasspacks and side exit exhausts. I am about twelve and hear this deep powerful exhaust and ask the driver as he gets out "is that a big-block?"

Charlie

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Mustangsandmore Front Page

Copyright 2006, Steve LaRiviere. All Rights Reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47d

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

[Members' Pics]

[Tech Articles]