Brought to you in part by:

.


  Mustangsandmore Forums
  Ford Racing
  Rear crossover on SBF intake?

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Rear crossover on SBF intake?
Bloose
Gearhead

Posts: 755
From: Milwaukee, WI
Registered: Dec 2001

posted 02-09-2005 07:28 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Bloose   Click Here to Email Bloose     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
What's the deal with the rear crossover on some SBF intakes? I would have thought that not having it was better to keep the water flowing from rear to front in the heads. But I noticed that a stock '83 4V has the rear passage. So now I'm not sure. Are you better off with or without this feature?

B-loose

IP: Logged

Moneymaker
Administrator

Posts: 26813
From: Lyons, IL, USA
Registered: May 99

posted 02-09-2005 12:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Moneymaker   Click Here to Email Moneymaker     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Later carb engines had a tough time meeting emission standards.
They were trying to keep the intake heat consistant.

------------------
Alex Denysenko
Co-Administrator and Moderator

NHRA/IHRA/SRA member and licensed Superstock driver
NHRA and IHRA SS/LA & SS/MA National Record Holder '00,'01,'02,'03,'04 &'05
First SS/MA in the TENS!
IHRA division 5 Superstock Champion
Fleet of FoMoCo products including 88 ASC McLaren Mustang #28

The Barry of BarrysGrrl

Quote #1: "I never met a magazine mechanic I liked."
Quote #2: "Make sure brain is in gear before engaging mouth!"
Quote #3: "If you can't run with the big dogs, stay on the porch!"
www.moneymakerracing.com

IP: Logged

Bloose
Gearhead

Posts: 755
From: Milwaukee, WI
Registered: Dec 2001

posted 02-09-2005 08:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Bloose   Click Here to Email Bloose     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
So it was just an emmisions thing??? I've noticed on some performance intakes you can get it either way. Are you better off without it?

P.S. are the stock 4V aluminum intakes from the late models (look the same as the early cast iron intakes) OK or are they complete crap. How do they compare to the Performer?

B-loose

IP: Logged

Moneymaker
Administrator

Posts: 26813
From: Lyons, IL, USA
Registered: May 99

posted 02-09-2005 09:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Moneymaker   Click Here to Email Moneymaker     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I wouldn't give ya $2 for a late FoMoCo 4v aluminum intake.

------------------
Alex Denysenko
Co-Administrator and Moderator

NHRA/IHRA/SRA member and licensed Superstock driver
NHRA and IHRA SS/LA & SS/MA National Record Holder '00,'01,'02,'03,'04 &'05
First SS/MA in the TENS!
IHRA division 5 Superstock Champion
Fleet of FoMoCo products including 88 ASC McLaren Mustang #28

The Barry of BarrysGrrl

Quote #1: "I never met a magazine mechanic I liked."
Quote #2: "Make sure brain is in gear before engaging mouth!"
Quote #3: "If you can't run with the big dogs, stay on the porch!"
www.moneymakerracing.com

IP: Logged

Bloose
Gearhead

Posts: 755
From: Milwaukee, WI
Registered: Dec 2001

posted 02-10-2005 12:16 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Bloose   Click Here to Email Bloose     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I guess that answers that question! Are the early iron 4V's scrap also? The look pretty simular.

What do you think of the Performer manifold for a 302 w/around 214* or duration? Or would I be better off putting an RPM on there?

B-loose

IP: Logged

Rory McNeil
Gearhead

Posts: 1614
From: Surrey, B.C. Canada
Registered: Nov 2000

posted 02-10-2005 03:38 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Rory McNeil   Click Here to Email Rory McNeil     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Moneymaker:
I wouldn't give ya $2 for a late FoMoCo 4v aluminum intake.



I`ll give ya $3.00! . On my 85 Mustang Stocker, I have to retain the crappy flat OE intake, luckily, I can find the intakes, 4180 "smog" carbs, a E5 heads really cheap, because nobody else wants them!
Bloose, for a mild engine like that, the Performer 289 should work quite well. I ran one on my 302 Fairmont, & was quite happy with it, shifting at 5500 rpm.

------------------
78 Fairmont 428 4 speed 10.20@130mph
80 Fairmont 302 5 speed 12.8@105mph
85 Mustang NHRA M/Stock 302 5speed. [email protected]
59 Meteor (Canadian Ford) 2 dr sedan 332, auto
74 F350 ramp truck 390 4spd

IP: Logged

Moneymaker
Administrator

Posts: 26813
From: Lyons, IL, USA
Registered: May 99

posted 02-10-2005 07:59 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Moneymaker   Click Here to Email Moneymaker     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Ditto.

------------------
Alex Denysenko
Co-Administrator and Moderator

NHRA/IHRA/SRA member and licensed Superstock driver
NHRA and IHRA SS/LA & SS/MA National Record Holder '00,'01,'02,'03,'04 &'05
First SS/MA in the TENS!
IHRA division 5 Superstock Champion
Fleet of FoMoCo products including 88 ASC McLaren Mustang #28

The Barry of BarrysGrrl

Quote #1: "I never met a magazine mechanic I liked."
Quote #2: "Make sure brain is in gear before engaging mouth!"
Quote #3: "If you can't run with the big dogs, stay on the porch!"
www.moneymakerracing.com

IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Mustangsandmore Front Page

Copyright 2005, Steve LaRiviere. All Rights Reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47d

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

[Acronyms][Calendar][Chat][Classifieds] [Members' Pics]

[ Mustangsandmore.com Bookstore] [ Smokin' Fords] [Tech Articles]