Brought to you in part by:

.


  Mustangsandmore Forums
  Ford Racing
  Is bigger better!

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Is bigger better!
MR.73STANG
Journeyman

Posts: 49
From: C.A. MODESTO
Registered: Dec 2004

posted 01-07-2005 05:26 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for MR.73STANG   Click Here to Email MR.73STANG     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Should I go with a 2 1/2 inch exhaust or a 3 inch? My hooker headers are 3 inch at the collector. Or does it really matter. MoneyMaker what kind of exhaust do u run?
Thanks for the info

Everybody Have a good weekend

IP: Logged

N266fords
Gearhead

Posts: 1652
From: Sierra Vista ,Az USA
Registered: Apr 2003

posted 01-07-2005 05:37 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for N266fords   Click Here to Email N266fords     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I dont know what motor or specs but if its a mild motor under 350 hp go with 2.5,
Keep the velocity up and temp of the gasses

IP: Logged

steve'66
Gearhead

Posts: 9489
From: Sonoma,CA,USA
Registered: Mar 2000

posted 01-07-2005 05:42 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for steve'66   Click Here to Email steve'66     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
MoneyMaker does run an exhaust.

I vote for the closest thing to no exhaust, which means bigger is better. For racing anyway,

SteveW

IP: Logged

N266fords
Gearhead

Posts: 1652
From: Sierra Vista ,Az USA
Registered: Apr 2003

posted 01-07-2005 06:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for N266fords   Click Here to Email N266fords     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yes but there are a lot of factors X-pipe, mufflers, mandrel bends, lenght of pipes amount of turns, how much radius each turn has ect..
Compression ratio, gears, rpms, ect. All of these make the exaust work and to what are you trying to achieve, sound, performance, street,ect...
Bruce

IP: Logged

Ryan Wilke
Gearhead

Posts: 2289
From: Stanton, Michigan 49707
Registered: Oct 2000

posted 01-07-2005 06:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ryan Wilke   Click Here to Email Ryan Wilke     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Glad to hear you got the headers - you'll like them!!

For your warmed-over 351W/FMX setup, 2.5" pipes all the way out would be just fine.

As Bruce mentioned, try to locate a muffler shop that'll bend your exhaust pipes with a MANDREL rather than a 'pipe crusher unit'. The smoother the bends, the better the flow.

An X or H-pipe about 15-20" out from the collectors, then a pair of DynoMax Turbos would finish off the system!

Ryan

P.S.
Then comes the traction-loc differential, 3.89 rear gears, Holley carb, etc.... the fun never ends!!

IP: Logged

Dubz
Gearhead

Posts: 1890
From: Manitoba Canada
Registered: Oct 2002

posted 01-07-2005 07:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dubz   Click Here to Email Dubz     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I persoanlly would go with 3" to a 3" x-pipe, then after the x-pipe reduced to 2.5" the rest of the way. Some good reducers like the flowmaster ones that are gradual are the key wherever you put them.

IP: Logged

stroker man
Gearhead

Posts: 332
From: Denville NJ USA
Registered: Mar 2002

posted 01-07-2005 07:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for stroker man   Click Here to Email stroker man     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
thats what i have 3'' x-pipe into 2.50 2chamber flows into 2.50 ex.

IP: Logged

johnny 4-speed
Gearhead

Posts: 172
From: Larkspur, Ca. USA
Registered: Oct 2004

posted 01-07-2005 08:32 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for johnny 4-speed   Click Here to Email johnny 4-speed     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Mr.Stang, sir. I run 3" collectors on my 351-headed 289. They are then sharply reduced to 2 1/2" with H-pipe, 3 chamber Flows, then turn outs ahead of the rear wheels.
I gained 5 MPH when I ran without the exhaust! With that in mind, I r'mend the biggins'! JD

------------------
Never fry bacon naked!
------------
65 Fairlane
289ci
Top loader
9-inch w./5.13's & locker
27"x10.5 cheaters

[This message has been edited by johnny 4-speed (edited 01-07-2005).]

IP: Logged

steve'66
Gearhead

Posts: 9489
From: Sonoma,CA,USA
Registered: Mar 2000

posted 01-07-2005 08:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for steve'66   Click Here to Email steve'66     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
My/our '66 gains 3-4 mph and looses .2 seconds in the 1/4 with open headers. Versus 3" exhaust to 3" single chamber flows that exit in front of the rear end. Say all you want about x pipes and stuff, open headers work best on the strip.

Now Mr73's is a daily driver and open headers aren't an option. But I still think bigger is better.

SteveW

IP: Logged

MR.73STANG
Journeyman

Posts: 49
From: C.A. MODESTO
Registered: Dec 2004

posted 01-07-2005 08:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for MR.73STANG   Click Here to Email MR.73STANG     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Steve'66 I was thinking about runing 3" piping to my 2 chamber flows with a 3" turndown. What do you think? Do i really need a x-pipe, or h-pipe?

IP: Logged

Dad Vishus
Gearhead

Posts: 920
From: Moscow, Iowa, USA
Registered: Dec 2001

posted 01-07-2005 09:40 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dad Vishus   Click Here to Email Dad Vishus     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Every time I have changed a factory exhaust system, its been to improve mileage and performance.

I bought a new 77 Econoline with a 351W 2 barrel. It was a slug and got terrible mileage. I put a set of $79 headers on it, Thorley I think, and 2 - 2.5 inch full length pipes with fairly quiet aftermarket mufflers. I immediately picked up 3 MPG.

The E350 we towed with before the Powerstroke came along was a real healthy 460. I put cheapo type headers on it, 2.5 inch primaries into a Flowmaster 2 - 2.5 inch into 1 - 3 inch y-connector. That is a real nice piece, BTW. From that into a Dynomax 3 inch RV muffler and a 3 inch tail pipe. It was quiet, and efficient. We did the same set-up on my Dads C class motorhome it worked so well.

I guess my point here is, bigger is better.

Those 2 chamber Flowmasters are LOUD, obnoxiously loud, so be prepared for that. On an every day driver, they will get on your nerves. With just turndowns, all that noise is where you will hear it the most. It might be neat for a while, but......

Anyway, I've had good luck going with the biggest possible pipe sizes. Theres no substitute for free flow!

------------------
63 Falcon 377 Cleveland stroker Flying Toilet alchohol injection. 6.19 @ 110 MPH 1/8 mile
2002 Ranger FX4 daily driver
2000 F350 PSD Crew cab dually - Like commuting in a B52!!
98 US Cargo Phantom II 28'

IP: Logged

steve'66
Gearhead

Posts: 9489
From: Sonoma,CA,USA
Registered: Mar 2000

posted 01-07-2005 10:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for steve'66   Click Here to Email steve'66     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by MR.73STANG:
Steve'66 I was thinking about runing 3" piping to my 2 chamber flows with a 3" turndown. What do you think? Do i really need a x-pipe, or h-pipe?

I would run 3" 'til the tail pipes, (if you want tail pipes) then Flowmaster's 2 1/2" mandrel bent tailpipes out the back. The muffler choice is yours. It's probably overkill for a warmed over 351w, but you may grow into it. Also, I don't beleive in X or H pipes. I could be wrong on them, but they are not open headers. LOL

SteveW

IP: Logged

N266fords
Gearhead

Posts: 1652
From: Sierra Vista ,Az USA
Registered: Apr 2003

posted 01-07-2005 10:43 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for N266fords   Click Here to Email N266fords     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Steve I can still unbolt my X-pipe to have open headers at the track.. For the street they scavenge very well.
Bruce Williams

IP: Logged

steve'66
Gearhead

Posts: 9489
From: Sonoma,CA,USA
Registered: Mar 2000

posted 01-07-2005 11:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for steve'66   Click Here to Email steve'66     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Bruce,

I don't disagree with you. We have to run muff's at the track on Wednesday nights. So we leave the exhaust on even when we don't have too for consistency. They are just 44" long and don't get in the way of anything. X and H pipes are in the way of the tranny, etc. They may help mid range, but I wasn't commenting about sreetability. With a 4500 stall converter we wouldn't notice mid range torque or responsiveness anyway. For a driver and a warmed over 351w with a FMX, your sugesstion is a great one. But, if he wants to kick it up in future....

SteveW

IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Mustangsandmore Front Page

Copyright 2005, Steve LaRiviere. All Rights Reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47d

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

[Acronyms][Calendar][Chat][Classifieds] [Members' Pics]

[ Mustangsandmore.com Bookstore] [ Smokin' Fords] [Tech Articles]