Brought to you in part by:

.


  Mustangsandmore Forums
  Ford Racing
  Very discouraged- new engine & blue smoke

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Very discouraged- new engine & blue smoke
matt d
Journeyman

Posts: 51
From: Coventry, CT USA
Registered: Mar 2003

posted 06-05-2004 07:14 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for matt d     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Well, I have about 600 miles on my newly rebuilt engine and it is still putting out consistent blue smoke. Thin but noticeable if you look close at idle, and volume increases when RPMs increase. I am worried my rings did not seat properly. Any advice would be very appreciated.

Here are the details. 351W stock block 0.040 over, sized and honed by a reputable machine shop to fit new DSS pro-lite pistons. 0.005" piston to wall clearance per piston mfg specs. Rings are speed pro plasma moly, file fit by me to 0.019" on top and 0.023" on second. Standard tension oil rings. Heads were just rebuilt with new bronze valve guides and I very thoroughly prepared the valvetrain to have optimum geometry to best avoid side loading the valve guides (lots of test fitting of different rocker arm combos). Teflon valve guide seals were used.

Pistons were installed (by me) with Childs and Albert piston assembly lube, and the rings gap positions were aligned properly. Engine was broken in using non-synthetic 10W-30, with a filter change after the first 20 minutes and a full oil change (still 10W-30) after the first 10 miles.

This is the third engine I have put together myself and I have never had this problem. I pulled a few plugs (the accessible ones) and they did not look too bad...semi clean and grayish on the insulator and electrode, and little black soot near the threads. I have had minor carb issues with my new 750 double-pumper so it has been running a bit rich if that means anything to the rings.

Any suggestions? Any way to rectify the situation short of pulling the engine again and trying new rings? Any hope to surpress my blues?

Thanks a lot,
Matt

IP: Logged

SteveLaRiviere
Administrator

Posts: 41328
From: Saco, Maine
Registered: May 99

posted 06-05-2004 07:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SteveLaRiviere   Click Here to Email SteveLaRiviere     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Have you ruled out things like oil being sucked in though the PCV valve line from an unbaffled valve cover or an intake gasket leak?

Have you done compression and leak down tests to see if it's an actual ring seal problem?

Is it just a little hazing, or are you killing mosquitos county wide?

------------------
'70 Mustang Mach 1 351C 4V/FMX/3.25 Open
'70 Mustang Convertible 250 I6/3 speed/2.79 Open
'72 Mustang Sprint Hardtop 351C 4V/FMX/4.30 Trac Loc
'94 F-150 XL 5.8L/E4OD/3.55 Limited Slip

[This message has been edited by SteveLaRiviere (edited 06-05-2004).]

IP: Logged

wildfire466
unregistered
posted 06-05-2004 09:48 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'm kind of with Steve, he's got some excellent points there. I was also thinking the wrong PVC Valve or a slid intake gasket.

You can cover the PCV System and use a unlit propane torch. Allow the propane into one of the valve covers. If the engine picks up or misses then ya found your problem. This may also be contributing to your carb problem as well?

Sorry to hear your having trouble with your new engine. Personaly I'm a Steel Ring fan.

Les

------------------
http://www.geocities.com/wildfire1mustang/

IP: Logged

ted
Journeyman

Posts: 56
From: Central Texas
Registered: May 2003

posted 06-05-2004 11:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ted   Click Here to Email ted     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
What about your heads? Could be pulling oil down the guides if you have very high manifold vacuum and just using umbrella seals. You might pull the plugs and see if the problem is all cylinders or isolated to specific ones.

Intake gasket pulling oil from the valley side is another possibility but I would think that would show up on a vacuum gauge as a flutter. Just add this to the list of maybe's.

------------------
Ted E.
Fe's are plenty fast, but "Y"'s are fun when they run in the nines.

IP: Logged

matt d
Journeyman

Posts: 51
From: Coventry, CT USA
Registered: Mar 2003

posted 06-06-2004 07:58 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for matt d     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks for the replies so far. The amount of smoke may be okay for somebody's junker, but is completely unacceptable for a gearhead's pride and joy. You could miss it at idle if not looking for it, but it is clearly visible at power.

1) I have spent time hoping it was the PCV, so I temporarily disconnected it and drove around a bit. No change to the amount of smoke.

2) I cannot prove that it is not sucking in oil from a bad intake gasket, but it smokes under wide open throttle too, when there is no vacuum in the intake manifold. That is why I keep thinking it is rings.

3) The valve guides are those tight fitting white teflon style. The heads are newly rebuilt so they "should" be okay, but they are unproven. I think the only way to check this would be to pull the intake and check the valves for oil on their topside?

Next: I do own a leakdown tester and a compression tester, so I will try those tests, and the propane check too. A 351W in a '66 is no fun task to pull the plugs, but it is just a little easier than pulling the engine.

So should I expect consistent but very low readings on the leakdon tester or would you expect large cylinder to cylinder variations? So if the rings are the culprit, is the problem that my oil rings are not seating against the cylinder properly or that the oil, second and top rings are all not sealing?

IP: Logged

matt d
Journeyman

Posts: 51
From: Coventry, CT USA
Registered: Mar 2003

posted 06-06-2004 12:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for matt d     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I just performed a compression test.

Results were that all cylinders were between 188 and 193 psi cranking pressure (cold engine). Sounds about right to me. Engine has a 10.3 to 1 CR and a 236/242 deg. at 0.050" solid roller cam.

I am not sure what to think about the plugs. They were all pretty consistent: clean insulator and ground strap, but shiny black at the thread area.

------------------
66 coupe with: 351W, Comp Cams XE274R solid roller cam, Fox Lake Stage 2 Trickflow heads, Performer RPM intake, 750 DP carb, Tremec TKO, 9" rear w/ 3.70s and a True-Trac limited slip

IP: Logged

69maverick
Moderator

Posts: 1403
From: Thomaston,CT.
Registered: Jan 2001

posted 06-06-2004 01:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for 69maverick   Click Here to Email 69maverick     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
To me it sounds like a Valve guide problem?or maybe a seal?Does it smoke more at startup after the motor has been sitting a while than if you run it shut if of and restart it? If it was a seal or guide you might be able to narrow it down by changing plugs to a new set run it for 20 minites or so then pull the plugs and look for a plug thats oil fouled.

[This message has been edited by 69maverick (edited 06-06-2004).]

IP: Logged

kid vishus
Gearhead

Posts: 5947
From: middle of NC
Registered: Oct 2000

posted 06-06-2004 01:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for kid vishus   Click Here to Email kid vishus     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
A leakdown test will tell you more than a compression test.

Just grasping here, but you said it's running rich. Are you sure it's an oil smoke, and not a 'rich' smoke? As for the plug colouring, if you have any type of capacitive discharge ignition (MSD or similar), it wont colour them worth a darn, especially at low rpms.

IP: Logged

wildfire466
unregistered
posted 06-06-2004 01:21 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Slightly off topic:

Last idea then,

Moly rings have a different wall finish. I've read pros and cons on this.

I use to coat the pistons with 30w oil for assembly but found out that if oil gets trapped behind the rings it can burn a ring tight to the piston. I was told to use WD-40 oil in the future and just coat the wall. I'm not trying to change the post here just offering ideas to think about.

Since you've built engines befor it's kind of hard to find fault such as rings installed upside down and such!

Um, what about this... leaky fuel pump or overly rich carb duluting the engine oil to the point it is thin? Or a leaky needle and seat so when the engine is shut off over night the fuel will puddle and dulute the oil? How is the oil pressure?

What engine temp are you running? High temp can break down engine oil as well.

See ya!

Les

------------------
http://www.geocities.com/wildfire1mustang/

IP: Logged

69 Sportsroof
Gearhead

Posts: 1726
From: Valley, Alabama, USA
Registered: Mar 2002

posted 06-06-2004 01:21 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for 69 Sportsroof   Click Here to Email 69 Sportsroof     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Are you having to add oil? If not, it could be a carb or ignition problem.

IP: Logged

matt d
Journeyman

Posts: 51
From: Coventry, CT USA
Registered: Mar 2003

posted 06-06-2004 01:26 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for matt d     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I don't think it smokes more at startup after it has been sitting. All of the plugs looked essentially the same.

IP: Logged

matt d
Journeyman

Posts: 51
From: Coventry, CT USA
Registered: Mar 2003

posted 06-06-2004 01:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for matt d     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
As far as it being "rich" smoke, it really looks blue. And I have moved to much leaner main jets, and the smoke did not seen to change (my O2 sensor meter says it is much leaner now). Rich smoke should be black right? I have never seen black smoke come out of the tailpipes, even if I just keep cycling the gas pedal in neutral so the accel pump dumps in lots of fuel.

I do have a capacitive discharge ignition, so it is probably just cleaning the plugs for me. That explains the plugs.

As far as having to add oil, I do not have enough consistent miles to be able to measure that. I have added a little, but I have also pulled the valve covers a few times and dripped a little out, etc.

Engine has good oil pressure: 60 psi hot at 2300 RPM and above, 24 psi idle hot, 80 psi when cold. Standard volume oil pump. Engine has a 180 deg thermostat and the engine has never been past about 185 degrees.

I did thoroughly coat the pistons and rings with some Childs and Alberts assembly lube designed for pistons rings (seemed like just heavy weight oil). Maybe I used too much lube? I don't think the rings are in upside down, I was pretty anal putting this engine together.

One other note, if I pull the PCV hose with the engine running at normal operating temp, I can see a small mist of oil(?) trickling out of the valve cover hole. I do not know if this is normal or not.

Is there any way to check valve guides and seals without pulling the heads?

Thanks again for all the replies so far.

IP: Logged

matt d
Journeyman

Posts: 51
From: Coventry, CT USA
Registered: Mar 2003

posted 06-06-2004 03:36 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for matt d     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Okay, I just performed a leakdown test. Results show between 4 and 5.5% leakdown for all cylinders (cold engine). The ones that were on the lower side here somewhat correspond to the ones on the lower side from the compression test.

Sounds healthy to me.

IP: Logged

F551
Gearhead

Posts: 238
From: Manitoba, Canada
Registered: Nov 2000

posted 06-06-2004 03:51 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for F551   Click Here to Email F551     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I believe this is my 200th post

Maybe it's time to pull the intake - leakdown is beautiful!

------------------
Fred
68 Mustang 500CID/Powerglide - "No Tubs"
86 Mustang GT Cobra

IP: Logged

steve'66
Gearhead

Posts: 8661
From: Sonoma,CA,USA
Registered: Mar 2000

posted 06-06-2004 06:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for steve'66   Click Here to Email steve'66     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by matt d:
One other note, if I pull the PCV hose with the engine running at normal operating temp, I can see a small mist of oil(?) trickling out of the valve cover hole. I do not know if this is normal or not.


Can you plug the pcv hose and put a breather in the valve cover? Then take it for another test drive. If the smoke goes away you'll need a baffle under the pcv port in the valve cover.

It could be the intake gasket too, but this is an easy test.

SteveW

IP: Logged

matt d
Journeyman

Posts: 51
From: Coventry, CT USA
Registered: Mar 2003

posted 06-06-2004 06:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for matt d     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I tried disconnecting the pcv hose and attaching just a breather, but it didn't seem to help.....still smoke. I may try again before I pull the engine apart.

I guess I need to pull the intake. One last question though, does "rich" smoke ever look blue/white? I am grasping here.

I appreciate all the advice from everybody.

-Matt

IP: Logged

Mr. FoMoGO
Journeyman

Posts: 62
From: Ga. USA
Registered: Dec 2003

posted 06-06-2004 10:14 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mr. FoMoGO     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
are you loosing coolant? could be antifreeze.

IP: Logged

steve'66
Gearhead

Posts: 8661
From: Sonoma,CA,USA
Registered: Mar 2000

posted 06-06-2004 10:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for steve'66   Click Here to Email steve'66     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Matt,

With your test results the last thing I'd do is pull the motor out. Run it and see what happens. Pull the intake if you want, but I've had that happen before and it oil fouled some plugs more than others. Just my .02

SteveW

IP: Logged

Fordwiser
Gearhead

Posts: 357
From: Metamora, Illinois
Registered: Dec 2000

posted 06-06-2004 11:56 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Fordwiser   Click Here to Email Fordwiser     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Just a thought, if the car is an automatic pull the vacuum line off at the intake and make sure it's not wet with tranny fluid, the diaphragm in the modulater valve cam rupture let the engine suck in fluid.
Roger

IP: Logged

matt d
Journeyman

Posts: 51
From: Coventry, CT USA
Registered: Mar 2003

posted 06-07-2004 12:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for matt d     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yeah, I guess I should be patient about pulling the engine, it just kills me to put so much effort, money, and attention to detail into an engine and get sub-standard results.

As far as coolant goes, it appears to have zero loss. The tranny is a manual so no tranny fluid possibilities.

So the possibilities that I see are:
1) Intake gasket issue allowing oil to be sucked into intake ports.
2) Valve guide/seal issue allowing oil to be sucked into intake ports.
3) Rings that hold combustion pressure okay but do not control oil well.
4) PCV pulling too much oil (maybe I didn't drive around long enough with it disconnected or the extra blowby with it disconnected cause a second oil burning problem)
5) rings need more time to seat.
6) engine runs rich and magically changes its smoke from black to white.

I am going to retry my PCV disconnect test and rig a baffle and or oil separator setup. I will also change the oil again in case it got too contaminated when it was running rich and breaking in. Then I will probably pull the intake after a few more miles.

-Matt

IP: Logged

Tea'sGrabber
Gearhead

Posts: 276
From: Seattle, Wash.
Registered: Feb 2003

posted 06-07-2004 12:21 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tea'sGrabber   Click Here to Email Tea'sGrabber     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
600 miles..... Switch to a straight 30wt and drive it.... It takes a while for the rings to seal..

IP: Logged

Bloose
Gearhead

Posts: 546
From: Milwaukee, WI
Registered: Dec 2001

posted 06-07-2004 06:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Bloose   Click Here to Email Bloose     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'm with Tea Grabber, I think 600 miles is pretty few. I'd drive it a while longer before I start to worry. Maybe more like 3~5K. After all, 3000 miles between normal oil changes and it wouldn't be that big of a deal if it took to the first oil change (in most stock vehicles) for the rings to seat.

HTH,
B-Loose

IP: Logged

F551
Gearhead

Posts: 238
From: Manitoba, Canada
Registered: Nov 2000

posted 06-07-2004 06:43 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for F551   Click Here to Email F551     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
"Speed-Pro ring sets feature plasma-moly faced ductile iron top rings for nearly instant ring seating, superior cylinder sealing, and optimum durability under the most grueling conditions."

This is right from Federal Mogul's website (must be true).

We use Speed Pro plasma moloy rings in our motor - we consider break in done after completion of the first pass on the rings!

With your leak down numbers, I don't believe you have a problem with rings - and if it has new guides / positive seals.....

------------------
Fred
68 Mustang 500CID/Powerglide - "No Tubs"
86 Mustang GT Cobra

IP: Logged

Tea'sGrabber
Gearhead

Posts: 276
From: Seattle, Wash.
Registered: Feb 2003

posted 06-08-2004 10:58 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tea'sGrabber   Click Here to Email Tea'sGrabber     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I agree...F551.... except... you're tuned and ready to go out of the box... He's not... The biggest cause of ring failure to seal properly on initial break in is tuning... In Matt's case he's been washing the cylinder walls down with fuel.... which with a standard tension oil rings... it's going take awhile.. Matt get the tune right and put your right foot to the floor!!!!!!!

------------------
Todd 71 Mav Grabber All orig 306 cu.in. Cast Iron heads. Carillo Rods.Best et. 10.71 @ 124 thru the mufflers.
http://mustangsandmore.50megs.com/MembersPics/TeasGrabber.html

IP: Logged

matt d
Journeyman

Posts: 51
From: Coventry, CT USA
Registered: Mar 2003

posted 06-08-2004 12:29 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for matt d     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I was wondering if my carb problems hurt the break-in. I have learned my lesson about using an unproven new carb on a brand new engine. It was from a reputable custom carb shop that dyno'd the carb BUT when I got it had multiple problems. The choke spring was in backwards (so all airflow to the primaries SHUT OFF when the engine warmed up a bit). Also the primary and secondary jets were swapped causing a very rich condition. This is all I have found and corrected so far in the carb.

So doing nothing but drive it is definitely the easy plan. I will change the oil and be patient for now. I also put a baffle in the valve cover at the PCV pickup last night just in case that helps. If the fuel wash on the cylinders hurt the break-in process I hope it can be rectified with miles.

IP: Logged

66-408-stang
Journeyman

Posts: 56
From: lafayette, in usa
Registered: Nov 2000

posted 06-08-2004 12:37 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for 66-408-stang   Click Here to Email 66-408-stang     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Matt, what kind of intake and intake gasket?
If a single plane, you maybe able to pull the carb and shine a light into the heads a bit (use a small mirror) to look for signs of intake gasket failure. If a dual plane, pull the intake for inspection. If the back of the intake valves are crusty or there is evidence of oil in the intake track then there is oil is coming from the top end, valve guides, intake gasket, or pcv. If everything is clean upstairs then the oil is coming past the rings.

Block off the pcv for the time being, but be sure to ventilate the crankcase (install a filter in each valve cover).

If it is past the rings, run it hard, full throttle then coast then full throttle under a heavy load. Don't let it detonate. You want to generate enough pressure to press the rings down into the ringlands and hard against the walls to wear them enough to provide 360 degrees sealing. Until this happens, hot gases are blowing past causing the oil to carbonize.

IP: Logged

matt d
Journeyman

Posts: 51
From: Coventry, CT USA
Registered: Mar 2003

posted 06-08-2004 12:51 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for matt d     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It is a performer RPM dual plane, so I may be able to see at least a couple of the intake ports....that's a good idea. I am also using a felpro 1262 gasket.

I have definitely given it full throttle many times already to try to seat the rings (oh yeah and to go fast). I will try some more.

IP: Logged

matt d
Journeyman

Posts: 51
From: Coventry, CT USA
Registered: Mar 2003

posted 06-13-2004 01:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for matt d     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
UPDATE (valve guides?)-

I pulled the intake and one head, and there is oil throughout the top end...in the intake manifold and intake ports, more heavily in one "plane" of the manifold than the other. The intake gasket looks fine, was in the proper place and appears to have been evenly compressed. It is not the PCV, since the oiling occurs even with the PCV passage baffled, filtered, and plugged.

So that leaves VALVE GUIDES in my opinion. The heads were just rebuilt by a reputable shop in another state who put in new Ferrea heavy duty valves and bronze valve guides. So after 600 miles, it seems something is very wrong. All of the intake ports in the heads are oily and two have walls which are colored brownish-gold. All of the valves have a thick layer of black crust on the top of their heads. A couple of the exhaust ports have shiny oil surrounding the valve guides, some are fine. I pulled the springs off a couple of the valves and I can wiggle the valves. A dial indicator on the valve head shows about 0.012" to 0.015" total wiggle. My guess is that the majority of the oil in the intake is from a couple of bad guides (the ones with the gold/brown ports) and the oil is being shared with the other ports from intake reversion, etc.

So my question is: Do these clues have to add up to bad valve guides or could I be missing something? I want to know so I have more confidence when I discuss this with the machine shop. Any other opinions?

Thanks,
Matt

IP: Logged

n2oMike
Gearhead

Posts: 2242
From: Spencer, WV
Registered: Jan 2001

posted 06-13-2004 01:52 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for n2oMike   Click Here to Email n2oMike     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Did you check the rocker arm geometry? I've had to install pushrods 1/4" different than stock before. Bad geometry will kill a set of guides pronto.

The roller tips need to be centered side to side... and front to back. They also need to have no more than 0.080" sweep as the cam goes through its lift cycle.

Good Luck!

------------------
Mike Burch
66 mustang real street
302 4-speed 289 heads
10.63 @ 129.3
http://www.geocities.com/carbedstangs/cmml_mburch.html
http://www.fortunecity.com/silverstone/healey/367
http://www.mustangworks.com/cgi-bin/moi-display.cgi?220

[This message has been edited by n2oMike (edited 06-13-2004).]

IP: Logged

matt d
Journeyman

Posts: 51
From: Coventry, CT USA
Registered: Mar 2003

posted 06-13-2004 02:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for matt d     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks for the reply Mike. I do not believe it is valvetrain geometry. I thoroughly checked the geometry during engine assembly and installed multiple rocker brands using an adjustable pushrod to get it perfect before I was satisfied. I ended up with a wear pattern less than 0.060" wide that was centered or within 0.010" fore/aft of centered on each valve tip. The majority of the 0.060" movement in the wear pattern was at the beginning of the valve travel, so during the higher lift portion the tip movement was minimized since this is where spring load is greatest. The rockers were also centered properly side/side. I am using Harland Sharp rockers designed for Twisted Wedge heads. So, although I can't completely rule out geometry issues, I am not sure what else would be humanly possible to do to further optimize valvetrain geometry.

IP: Logged

66-408-stang
Journeyman

Posts: 56
From: lafayette, in usa
Registered: Nov 2000

posted 06-14-2004 09:48 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for 66-408-stang   Click Here to Email 66-408-stang     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Matt, a couple of thoughts. You are using teflon seals. For the exhaust, you can remove the spring clip at the top of the seal. For intakes stretch the spring slightly to lessen the grip. These things can seal so well that the guides end up being oil starved, although 12-15 thousandths in 600 miles is a stretch. For strip use they work great at keeping all oil out of the chamber, reducing the chance of detonation.

Did you assemble the heads yourself? Do you know what the guide clearance was before?
Some shops will clearance the bronze guides with a ball hone, works great but needs extreme attention to cleaning or the granules of grit will continue to do their job. What kind of valves? Have seen some cheapies (I learned a hard lesson on this one) lose their chrome plating in small flakes, causing massive damage to the guides.
What manufacture of guides? K-line is excellent when properly installed.

Mike is right on about geometry. Any side loading will kill bronze guides quickly. What kind of springs? If not triples, are they located on the bottom by a cup to keep from walking off center and producing stem side loading?

IP: Logged

matt d
Journeyman

Posts: 51
From: Coventry, CT USA
Registered: Mar 2003

posted 06-14-2004 12:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for matt d     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It does use PC teflon seals. I did not assemble the heads myself, it was done by the porting shop (I wish I would have). The valves are Ferrea stainless, series 6000 I believe and they were not cheap...about $225 for a set. The guides are just bronze liners (about 0.060" thick) installed in the original cast iron guides. I think lthey are K-lines but I am not sure.

As far as geometry, I think my rocker geometry is all set, but you bring up a point I was wondering about....side loading due to movement of the spring cup. The spring cup is NOT rigidly located, it can move back and forth approximately 0.060". I noticed this when I received the heads, but the head-porter claimed this is how all of their Trick-flow heads get sent out since no-one makes an ID spring cup with an ID of 0.500" to locate on the top of the valve guide. It sounded like a crappy setup to me, but I ran it anyway since supposedly many others have run the same thing without issue. Maybe that is the key though.....?

IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Mustangsandmore Front Page

Copyright 2004, Steve LaRiviere. All Rights Reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47d

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

[Acronyms][Calendar][Chat][Classifieds] [Members' Pics]

[ Mustangsandmore.com Bookstore] [ Smokin' Fords] [Tech Articles]