Brought to you in part by:

.


JC Whitney clearance center!
  Mustangsandmore Forums
  Ford Racing
  Bearing clearance questions

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Bearing clearance questions
BLstangin
Gearhead

Posts: 779
From: St. James, MN
Registered: Apr 2002

posted 03-06-2004 04:42 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for BLstangin   Click Here to Email BLstangin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
O.k., I got the 306 apart to open up the top ring gap, and evertything looks o.k. The bearings look good, but I plastigauged the back main with the red plastigauge and came up with .004 clearance. That one was .001 looser than the rest when we put it together the first time. I have 20 pounds of oil pressure at and idle and 50 at 6,500 with 10w30 in it, and when I switched to 20w50, then I have 40 at idle and 70 at 6,500. I haven't checked the rods yet, but when I put it together the first time the mains were at .003 and the rods were at .002. So is .004 to much and should I go to an undersized bearing, or should I just put these back in and use 20w50 and drive it? I do drive it rather hard, but I would like it to last a while. I checked the rest and the front one is at about .0035, and the back one is at .004, the other 3 are at .003.
I've heard run them loose so that they get extra oil, and I've heard run them tight so that they don't hammer, so what should I do?

------------------
1970 coupe restored with the help of my dad. 306 with 600 holley, Weiand Stealth intake, headers, Comp cam, harland sharp roller rockers, kb pistons, 10.3:1 compression ratio, pertonix ignitor 2 with matched coil, lakewood bellhousing, 4-speed toploader, and 2.79 open 8" rear. Soon to be 9" 3.50 trac-lok
1986 f-150, 5.0, factory towing package with original c-6 trans

IP: Logged

steve'66
Gearhead

Posts: 8826
From: Sonoma,CA,USA
Registered: Mar 2000

posted 03-06-2004 05:28 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for steve'66   Click Here to Email steve'66     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
If everything looks good I'd put a hi-volume pump in it and run it.

SteveW

IP: Logged

bigblocked85
Gearhead

Posts: 163
From: Waterford,MI
Registered: May 2003

posted 03-06-2004 11:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for bigblocked85   Click Here to Email bigblocked85     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'm of a different mind. For one thing, plastigauge is a cavemans method of bearing measurment. It HAS to be measured with mics. Preferably calibrated at that. The differances you mention of are absolutely not tolerable. I see the norm going to around .0020-.0025. Depending on the bearing. At .0040 you would make a pro engine builder cry. Especially having a variance of .0010 between bearings.
Now on drag only machines, very loose tolerances may be the norm on VERY competitive engine combos like Alex's, but for a street strip combo, I would be very leary. My suggestion is to take it to a dependable shop and have accurate measurements takin and then make your decision.
Not the gospel, but I try to run .0025-.0025.

------------------
Gordon Ross
85 Mustang GT
466 C-4 mini tubbed

IP: Logged

BLstangin
Gearhead

Posts: 779
From: St. James, MN
Registered: Apr 2002

posted 03-07-2004 02:13 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for BLstangin   Click Here to Email BLstangin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I already have a high volume pump in it. I am going to school to be a machinist, so I have the tools and they are calibrated, but the problem is during spring break when I have time to work on it, the tools are , locked in the school because I didn't think about it beforehand. Also, I am just running the stock crank, which had about 90,000 miles on it, and it looked great, so I didn't have it ground. I think that maybe the back main has more wear because of the clutch in the back, I don't know.

------------------
1970 coupe restored with the help of my dad. 306 with 600 holley, Weiand Stealth intake, headers, Comp cam, harland sharp roller rockers, kb pistons, 10.3:1 compression ratio, pertonix ignitor 2 with matched coil, lakewood bellhousing, 4-speed toploader, and 2.79 open 8" rear. Soon to be 9" 3.50 trac-lok
1986 f-150, 5.0, factory towing package with original c-6 trans

[This message has been edited by BLstangin (edited 03-07-2004).]

IP: Logged

thumpin cat
Gearhead

Posts: 458
From: Santa Barbara, California
Registered: Mar 2002

posted 03-07-2004 02:41 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for thumpin cat     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Plastiguage is no good, and if you are measuring rod/main bearing clearences with plastigauge you should be using the green stuff, the red stuff tends to show clearences larger than they really are.

IP: Logged

BLstangin
Gearhead

Posts: 779
From: St. James, MN
Registered: Apr 2002

posted 03-07-2004 02:54 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for BLstangin   Click Here to Email BLstangin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Also, which bearings are the best for street driving, with a lot of abuse, but I don't want to tear it down all the time. Should I use clevite "p" series, clevite "h" series, federal mogul standard bearings, or federal mogul perfomance bearings? I will do it with micrometers when I get a chance.

------------------
1970 coupe restored with the help of my dad. 306 with 600 holley, Weiand Stealth intake, headers, Comp cam, harland sharp roller rockers, kb pistons, 10.3:1 compression ratio, pertonix ignitor 2 with matched coil, lakewood bellhousing, 4-speed toploader, and 2.79 open 8" rear. Soon to be 9" 3.50 trac-lok
1986 f-150, 5.0, factory towing package with original c-6 trans

IP: Logged

BLstangin
Gearhead

Posts: 779
From: St. James, MN
Registered: Apr 2002

posted 03-08-2004 04:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for BLstangin   Click Here to Email BLstangin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
O.k. I meausred everything with a micrometer and telescoping gauges.
The mains are:
#1 .003
#2 .0032
#3 .0032
#4 .0035
#5 .004

So should I just get .001 undersized or isn't that going to tighten it up enough?
The rods have .0025 on the first 3 journals and on the last they have .0022, so should I leave them or tighten them up. Grinding the crank is out of the question, I can't afford it, so what should I do?

------------------
1970 coupe restored with the help of my dad. 306 with 600 holley, Weiand Stealth intake, headers, Comp cam, harland sharp roller rockers, kb pistons, 10.3:1 compression ratio, pertonix ignitor 2 with matched coil, lakewood bellhousing, 4-speed toploader, and 2.79 open 8" rear. Soon to be 9" 3.50 trac-lok
1986 f-150, 5.0, factory towing package with original c-6 trans

IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Mustangsandmore Front Page

Copyright 2005, Steve LaRiviere. All Rights Reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47d

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

[Acronyms][Calendar][Chat][Classifieds] [Members' Pics]

[ Mustangsandmore.com Bookstore] [ Smokin' Fords] [Tech Articles]