E-RPM heads vs. GT40 alum's - Mustangsandmore Forums

Brought to you in part by:

.

Mustangsandmore Forums

E-RPM heads vs. GT40 alum's

profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Author	Topic: E-RPM heads vs. GT40 alum's
GT66K Journeyman Posts: 20 From: Upstate, NY Registered: Feb 2004	posted 02-29-2004 03:28 PM All things being equal (more or less) Which is the preferred. Valve size are the same CC's are close 56ccvs58cc etc. etc Thanks IP: Logged
steve'66 Gearhead Posts: 8826 From: Sonoma,CA,USA Registered: Mar 2000	posted 03-01-2004 12:17 AM I prefer Edelbrock heads. Great company, good owner and they work pretty good too. SteveW IP: Logged
indyphil Gearhead Posts: 2398 From: Senoia, G.A. USA Registered: Jul 2002	posted 03-04-2004 02:54 PM Check on the quality. I know the e/brocks come with helicoils in the exhaust stud holes - not sure about spark plug holes. Apart from the obvious flow/performance its those little touches that most people miss. ------------------ '68 coupe 289 C code 66 heads, edel 600cfm carb, performer intake, dual exhaust http://www.geocities.com/ottouk_77/68mustang.htm IP: Logged
Rustang Gearhead Posts: 733 From: Clarion PA Registered: Nov 2000	posted 03-04-2004 03:26 PM I'm thinking there's a huge difference in airflow between these two heads. (In favor of the RPM heads) ------------------ '68 mustang 351 clevor- 10.92@124 '67 Stang, 351W -11.18@118 '69 351C Torino-14.90@100 '78 Pickup 351W-15.56@88 '79 Pickup 460 ET=?? IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)	next newest topic \| next oldest topic
Administrative Options: Close Topic \| Archive/Move \| Delete Topic
	Hop to:

Contact Us | Mustangsandmore Front Page

Copyright 2005, Steve LaRiviere. All Rights Reserved.

Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47d

Amazon Honor System

[Acronyms][Calendar][Chat][Classifieds] [Members' Pics]

[ Mustangsandmore.com Bookstore] [ Smokin' Fords] [Tech Articles]