Author
|
Topic: Rear Suspension Setup
|
Scott (69Mach) Gearhead Posts: 734 From: Walnut Creek, CA USA Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 02-05-2004 05:30 PM
OK, I just read Door Slammers: The Chassis Book. Now that I know for sure that I know absolutely nothing about rear suspensions it��s time for me to throw a couple of questions to the peanut gallery. My desire is to get my car into the low 12s consistently. It ran 12.6s consistently last weekend in high 50 degree weather and I presume it will likely turn 12.7s to 12.8s in warmer air. I can likely get that down to 12.5s to 12.6s with more jetting and timing work. My question for all of you is can I shave a couple tenths with suspension tuning?The car currently leaves with no discernable tire spin on ET Streets. My 14 year old son says it doesn��t look like the slicks are spinning, I don��t feel any slip behind the wheel, and the videos don��t show much either way. Based on this, I think I can hit the tires harder for a better launch and shave some time. The car currently has new stock suspension (the Magna kit from Mustangs Plus) with Shelby under-ride bars. It has a Detroit Locker with 4.11s and a C6 with 18% lower first gear ratio (something approaching 4.30 equivalent in first gear). When the car leaves, the back squats a bit, the front rises a bit, and the car takes off pretty flat out of the lights. Armed with my newfound ignorance based on the Door Slammers book, my instant center appears to be below my neutral line (hence the rear squat and front lift). I��m guessing I��m not overpowering the tires off the line (only 390 lb-ft torque in third gear at 3000 rpm based on chassis dyno). Therefore, can I pick up a tenth or two by playing with the instant center? From what I understand, the Cal Tracs setup moves the instant center forward compared to stock so it likely won��t result in an increased hit to the rear tires. What options do I have to hit the tires harder and get a better jump out of the lights? Thanks a bunch, Scott P.S. The car is now primarily a strip car. It sees occasional day trip excursions with the local Mustang club, but other than that it sits in my garage taunting me.
IP: Logged |
rockafellz Gearhead Posts: 1426 From: San Lorenzo, CA, USA Registered: Aug 2001
|
posted 02-05-2004 06:05 PM
Hey Scott,You're fairly close to where I live. I'd like to see your car sometime. Any local cruises happening this spring? Anyway, what RPM are you leaving at now? From what i've learned here, to utilize your motor's full potential on launch, you want to launch your car at the motor's peak torque RPM level. So if your car made the most torque at say 4500, you'd want to launch at or near that. SteveW and Alex can get more specific to that matter. Also, from what i've learned from Alex, SteveW and Co. you want the front to lift but the rear NOT to squat. The weight transfer to the rear will aid in "planting" the tires with the FULL weight of the car on the rear tires at the moment of launch. Caltracs, again from what i've researched here, will transfer power faster to the tires without wrapup of the differential and springs. I've seen Melissa's and SteveW's '66 coupe barely lifting the front tires before they had the caltracs and monoleafs to lifting over a foot in the air and from what I recall made a difference in almost .4 - .5. I hope I said that right, being away from this site made me forget this stuff a little. I'm glad to be browsing and posting again. Erik ------------------ 1966 Ford Mustang 2+2 Father & Son built w/M&M Help :cool:
IP: Logged |
Scott (69Mach) Gearhead Posts: 734 From: Walnut Creek, CA USA Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 02-05-2004 06:12 PM
Erik, I don't get the car out for cruising much anymore. Too much hassle swapping out four tires. I'll be heading to Sacramento Raceway this Saturday if the weather gets its act together. Feel free to join me.I kinda figured the rear squat wasn't helping much. Now that everything else is working, it's time to put some effort into the rear. Mono's and Cal Tracs are an option, I just want to make sure it's the right option. I don't get much wrap-up now thanks to the under-ride bars. I just need to know how to eliminate the squat. Thanks, Scott [This message has been edited by Scott (69Mach) (edited 02-05-2004).]
IP: Logged |
Fastymz Moderator Posts: 18703 From: Reno Nv USA MEM#1240 Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 02-05-2004 06:19 PM
Do you have any new pictures of your car.
------------------ SCOOP oddly obsessed with big scoops on little Mustangs 2.26 60'S 14.9 @ 90.86MPH 65 coupe,351w,C4,Big Boss 429 hood scoop,8" 3.40 TracLoc. My Pics
IP: Logged |
Scott (69Mach) Gearhead Posts: 734 From: Walnut Creek, CA USA Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 02-05-2004 06:25 PM
Not yet. Lots of videos at the strip, but for some reason I haven't taken the time to shoot some regular shots of it. I'll get some next time I get it out of the garage...
IP: Logged |
steve'66 Gearhead Posts: 8826 From: Sonoma,CA,USA Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 02-05-2004 10:24 PM
Scott,Door slammers is mostly geared to Ladder bar/4 link cars. If you don't want to back half the car get CalTracs, mono leaf springs, and Rancho 9000 shocks from John Calvert. John will personally help you with getting it set up right too. Order them from Alex and he'll help you too. There've been many bracket races at Infineon when the back half cars with 14" wide slicks got loose and couldn't run the number against the leaf sprung 10" tired '66. Enough to make me think back halfing a car is not the only way to go. SteveW
IP: Logged |
ZEATER Gearhead Posts: 173 From: Mount Pleasant,IA,USA Registered: Aug 2001
|
posted 02-05-2004 11:54 PM
Scott,What is your 60' now? I have a 69 Mustang with CE slide a links Rancho shocks in back and CE 90/10 up front. My 60' is 1.65 and running low to mid 11's. My rear wheel hp is 472 and torque 475 though.
IP: Logged |
Scott (69Mach) Gearhead Posts: 734 From: Walnut Creek, CA USA Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 02-06-2004 09:15 AM
Zeater, I'm running 1.76s now coming off idle on the last amber.Alex, looks like I need some cal tracs from you. How much do I need to send you??? Thanks, Scott
IP: Logged |
Ryan Wilke Gearhead Posts: 2060 From: Stanton, Michigan 49707 Registered: Oct 2000
|
posted 02-06-2004 09:43 AM
quote: Originally posted by Scott (69Mach): Zeater, I'm running 1.76s now coming off idle on the last amber.Alex, looks like I need some cal tracs from you. How much do I need to send you??? Thanks, Scott
From M&Ms Classified Ads:
"Mustang Cal-Tracs always in stock. $317 plus shipping. For product info click here http://www.calvertracing.com/ For ordering info e-mail me at [email protected] ------------------ Alex Denysenko Co-Administrator and Moderator"
IP: Logged |
rockafellz Gearhead Posts: 1426 From: San Lorenzo, CA, USA Registered: Aug 2001
|
posted 02-06-2004 11:04 AM
Hey Scott,Just remembered, if you haven't already done so, clamp the leafs on the front half of your leaf springs. If you do that before this weekend's run, you may see a noticeable difference in your times. Just read your "New Times" thread and noticed that you already have a 3000 stall converter. Ever try leaving at 2500-2700 or so? Erik ------------------ 1966 Ford Mustang 2+2 Father & Son built w/M&M Help [This message has been edited by rockafellz (edited 02-06-2004).]
IP: Logged |
steve'66 Gearhead Posts: 8826 From: Sonoma,CA,USA Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 02-06-2004 09:01 PM
Scott,(Quote) From what I understand, the Cal Tracs setup moves the instant center forward compared to stock so it likely won��t result in an increased hit to the rear tires. What options do I have to hit the tires harder and get a better jump out of the lights? (endquote) That's not true the caltracks are infinately adjustable, especially combined with good rear shocks. They can hit the tires real hard set on the top hole with a stiff shock setting and a lot of preload. We run them pretty soft so they won't blow the tires off on poor track surfaces. They have plenty of adjustability. SteveW
IP: Logged |
kid vishus Gearhead Posts: 6098 From: middle of NC Registered: Oct 2000
|
posted 02-06-2004 09:26 PM
There is definately some improvement to be had in the 60' department even without spending a lot of money on parts. KK's car (my street '70), with 28x10 slicks and a 4.11 gear has gone 1.65 60' time with stock-wore-out original leaf springs clamped in the front, slapper bars, old air shocks in the rear, CE shocks up front set on 90/10, and 6 cylinder springs. Nothing fancy, but it works. The car will repeat the 60' time within .005 danged near every pass.
IP: Logged |
Scott (69Mach) Gearhead Posts: 734 From: Walnut Creek, CA USA Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 02-07-2004 12:46 AM
Kid, I'm getting consistent 60s now (1.795 +/- 0.005 to 0.008). But theres not much left to adjust. I could clamp the front of the springs, but I'm pretty sure the under-ride bars are giving me almost the same effect (maybe not...). I'm just looking for a better hit to the tires to get me that little bit extra in the first 60 ft. I'd love to get this thing down to the low 12s. No lower because I still occaissionaly drive the family around in the car for mustang events and don't want heads banging on a roll bar...
IP: Logged |
steve'66 Gearhead Posts: 8826 From: Sonoma,CA,USA Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 02-07-2004 01:00 AM
Scott,Also when you hit the tires harder things will get more unpredictable. Don't ask how I know. SteveW
IP: Logged |
Scott (69Mach) Gearhead Posts: 734 From: Walnut Creek, CA USA Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 02-07-2004 03:16 AM
Hmmm, since my objective is consistent ETs for bracket, are the Cal Tracs going to hurt my consistency or help? Or is that dependent upon how I abuse them...
IP: Logged |
kid vishus Gearhead Posts: 6098 From: middle of NC Registered: Oct 2000
|
posted 02-07-2004 09:20 AM
I think the simplest way to get your 60' times down would be to install a looser convertor. If it's not spinning now, I don't know if you can get much more ET out of it with the current motor/trans/convertor combo. If it was spinning, then I would say yes, but since it isn't spinning, I don't think changing traction aids will help.JMHO
IP: Logged |
Scott (69Mach) Gearhead Posts: 734 From: Walnut Creek, CA USA Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 02-07-2004 10:14 AM
It flashes to the mid 3s, which I think is consistent with the cam (Cam Research 226/230). I'll pay closer attention to how it performs today. I'm still coming off idle just because I'm still having to think about too many things at the line. I'm brand new to the game. Today I'll launch a few times off the converter and see how much that helps. Thanks for the tips guys, I really appreciate it.
IP: Logged |