Brought to you in part by:

.


JC Whitney clearance center!
  Mustangsandmore Forums
  Ford Racing
  Another cleveland cam question

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Another cleveland cam question
'69PonyRider
Gearhead

Posts: 238
From: Hawthorne, CA
Registered: Sep 2001

posted 11-24-2003 05:46 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for '69PonyRider   Click Here to Email '69PonyRider     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I finally settled on the engine combo i want to build, except for the cam which seems to be the grey area in engine building,

351C .030 over, 4V quench, 11:1 comp, C6 3000 stall, 4.11 gears, torker intake and 800cfm holley. in a nutshell.

would this cam work for me?
Crane part number 521211
570/590 lift 246/256 @.050 108 c/l
Lifters 99257-16

this is going in a 69 coupe with full interior and is a "street" car but i would not mind a lumpy cam, as long as i go fast. thanks

Aldo

[This message has been edited by '69PonyRider (edited 11-24-2003).]

IP: Logged

67357C
Gearhead

Posts: 475
From: Newcastle, WA.
Registered: Aug 2003

posted 11-24-2003 06:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for 67357C     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
You must decide if you want a solid or hydraulic lift first.

IP: Logged

'69PonyRider
Gearhead

Posts: 238
From: Hawthorne, CA
Registered: Sep 2001

posted 11-24-2003 06:05 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for '69PonyRider   Click Here to Email '69PonyRider     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
solid

IP: Logged

67357C
Gearhead

Posts: 475
From: Newcastle, WA.
Registered: Aug 2003

posted 11-24-2003 06:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for 67357C     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'm running that exact cam you specified in your first post. It's kind of lumpy, but not as much as my previous one. I won't make much vacuum, if that is a concern (it wasn't for me). I'm still in the process of getting the car to the track, so I can't give you any performance data; but that is a very popular cam and many people here have run it before, so feedback should be on its way. The problem I'm having right now is too small a converter, at first I thought it was an improperly tuned carb, due to being an absolute dog off the line, after talking with some people here, I determined it was my converter. Once you get into the power range of that cam... wammo tire melt.

IP: Logged

clevelandstyle
Gearhead

Posts: 1189
From: Connersville, IN
Registered: Jul 2001

posted 11-24-2003 07:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for clevelandstyle     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I run a cam of the same duration and similar lift. It is plenty "lopey" and has gone 11.15 in a 3025lb car. I would think you might want a higher stall speed if you want to optimize it for drag racing. My engine combo is very similar to yours, "in a nut shell".

------------------
Ben
Grabber Green '70 Mach I 351C 4V
Robbin Egg Blue '79 Fairmont 351C 4V

IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Mustangsandmore Front Page

Copyright 2005, Steve LaRiviere. All Rights Reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47d

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

[Acronyms][Calendar][Chat][Classifieds] [Members' Pics]

[ Mustangsandmore.com Bookstore] [ Smokin' Fords] [Tech Articles]