Author
|
Topic: Best head for power # under .600 lift
|
Dubz Gearhead Posts: 617 From: Manitoba Canada Registered: Oct 2002
|
posted 10-17-2003 01:35 AM
What would be the best windsor head for lift under .600". Most cam i would ever run would prolly be .560 or soThere isn't lots of difference between the AFR 185, Roush 200, Vic Jr at .500 (about 11cfm intake, but 65 cfm exhast, the world's have low exhaust #) will that much be a noticeable difference between any of them? would the AFR 205's be too big for my 351W? [This message has been edited by Dubz (edited 10-17-2003).]
IP: Logged |
jkilroy Gearhead Posts: 1758 From: Vicksburg, MS Registered: Dec 99
|
posted 10-21-2003 05:23 PM
Considering you are looking at cams of that size I think the 205's would be a good match.------------------ Jay Kilroy 68' Fastback GT 390 "No such thing as a cam thats too big"
IP: Logged |
Dubz Gearhead Posts: 617 From: Manitoba Canada Registered: Oct 2002
|
posted 10-24-2003 02:09 PM
would they be too big for a 282S or 270S, as in this is what i will be running for now, then when i get heads will be using 1.7 rockerswould they be a dog off the line for streeting?
IP: Logged |
steve'66 Gearhead Posts: 6658 From: Sonoma,CA,USA Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 10-24-2003 08:37 PM
Dubz,Those cams match up well to the Performer rpm heads. SteveW
IP: Logged |
Dubz Gearhead Posts: 617 From: Manitoba Canada Registered: Oct 2002
|
posted 10-25-2003 03:11 PM
but in all likelyhood the car will not go fast enough (as they never do) and i will want to swich cams to something bigger, and I fear that the rpm heads won't cut it.
IP: Logged |
sodi Journeyman Posts: 67 From: Kenosha Wi. USA Registered: Dec 2002
|
posted 10-26-2003 11:21 AM
How about the Roush 200s Can anyone tell me if those are the heads that require special headers??? I see that they make strait and angle plug holes for the chebbys Is that true for us ford lovers to put more selection of headers on not just the $$$ hookers ?------------------
IP: Logged |