|
Author
|
Topic: Roller Cam timing chain help????
|
N266fords
Gearhead Posts: 1586
From: Spokane ,WA USA
Registered: Apr 2003
|
posted 07-10-2003 05:55 PM
   
I have a 69 block 351 w with a 3.85 billet crank and a retro comp cams small base circle roller cam. Anyway what timing chain do i use i am running a mech fuel pump and a 1 piece essentric..Please help Im so cornfused..lol Bruce
IP: Logged |
mvierow
Gearhead Posts: 209
From: Bay Area, Ca
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 07-10-2003 07:49 PM
Hi Bruce, sorry I can't answer your question, I just wanted to let you know I have a similar post not to far down from this one.. subject is something like 'timing set selection'.I'm actually going to be running the TFS-51402001 cam, which has about .351" lobe lift(.563 @ valve w/ 1.6:1 rockers). I plan on running that retro conversion as well.. hopefully it will work alright. What are the specs on your cam? I think you can run your typical dual roller timing set without any problems. You could always call up summit support too to see what their opinion is. This is the one I plan on picking up, which should work well for you too. http://store.summitracing.com/partdetail.asp?part=FMS%2DM6268A302
IP: Logged |
N266fords
Gearhead Posts: 1586
From: Spokane ,WA USA
Registered: Apr 2003
|
posted 07-10-2003 09:02 PM
it is 230/230 @.050 .544/.544 lift 110 lobe seperation..Thats my small one the other is .644 lift also have victor jr heads and harland sharp rockers for it 1.6 ratio.Bruce
IP: Logged |
steve'66
Gearhead Posts: 9104
From: Sonoma,CA,USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 07-10-2003 09:14 PM
You need the chain set for a '69 351w. The cam or crank doesn't matter.SteveW
IP: Logged |
N266fords
Gearhead Posts: 1586
From: Spokane ,WA USA
Registered: Apr 2003
|
posted 07-11-2003 03:04 AM
thank you steve My question is then why do some say for H.O. and some dont whats the difference...
IP: Logged |
steve'66
Gearhead Posts: 9104
From: Sonoma,CA,USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 07-11-2003 10:06 AM
The H.O.'s had no fuel pump eccentric and fastory roller cams. Your '69 351w isn't a H.O.SteveW
IP: Logged |
mvierow
Gearhead Posts: 209
From: Bay Area, Ca
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 07-11-2003 12:48 PM
You should be fine with the set I mentioned above Bruce. Under application, it mentioned 351w, and even mentions requiring the eccentric under technical.
IP: Logged |
N266fords
Gearhead Posts: 1586
From: Spokane ,WA USA
Registered: Apr 2003
|
posted 07-11-2003 06:57 PM
thank all..Bruce
IP: Logged |
Mustangsandmore Forums
