Brought to you in part by:

.


JC Whitney clearance center!
  Mustangsandmore Forums
  Ford Racing
  351C copper head gaskets......

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   351C copper head gaskets......
'69Stang
Gearhead

Posts: 205
From: Detroit, MI USA
Registered: Jan 2002

posted 06-04-2003 10:50 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for '69Stang   Click Here to Email '69Stang     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Due to an o-ring issue with my heads I have to run copper gaskets. The guy I bought my heads from put a copper o-ring in the heads and unfortunately one of the O-rings lies outside of the compression ring on the Fel-Pro gaskets, it compresses in the cardboard material of the gasket. Anyway, it looks like the solution is to run copper gaskets to make up for this problem.


My question is what do I need to know about copper gaskets? Should I run the same compression height of .041 as the Fel-Pro��s, or do copper require a different gasket height? Thanks for any help, I have no experience on this topic.

------------------
'69 Mustang Fastback, 351C, Holley 950 HP, New Parker Funnelweb intake, ported 4-v quench heads, 10.75:1, UD pulley, windage tray, Top Loader, 4.30 gears 9" rear
-------------------------

12.51 1/4 mile @ 115.89
60 foot time 2.008 (ouch)

IP: Logged

'69Stang
Gearhead

Posts: 205
From: Detroit, MI USA
Registered: Jan 2002

posted 06-04-2003 04:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for '69Stang   Click Here to Email '69Stang     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Nobody wants to help me..... J/K


I think I am going to go with a .032 copper gasket height unless someone advises againt it.....

------------------
'69 Mustang Fastback, 351C, Holley 950 HP, New Parker Funnelweb intake, ported 4-v quench heads, 10.75:1, UD pulley, windage tray, Top Loader, 4.30 gears 9" rear
-------------------------

12.51 1/4 mile @ 115.89
60 foot time 2.008 (ouch)

IP: Logged

capri man
Gearhead

Posts: 6417
From: doerun, ga.
Registered: Nov 2000

posted 06-04-2003 04:41 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for capri man   Click Here to Email capri man     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
i want to stang, i just dont have a clue.

------------------
mike r
racing is real
everything else is just a game.
81 capri-7.51 @89mph 1/8
1.54 60 ft.
http://prestage.com/site/site_display.asp?SiteID=141

IP: Logged

steve'66
Gearhead

Posts: 8826
From: Sonoma,CA,USA
Registered: Mar 2000

posted 06-04-2003 05:30 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for steve'66   Click Here to Email steve'66     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
How far down in the bores are your pistons at tdc? You'll want .040-.045 quench.

SteveW

IP: Logged

Buster
Gearhead

Posts: 1437
From: Hurricane alley
Registered: May 2002

posted 06-04-2003 10:13 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Buster   Click Here to Email Buster     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I run copper head gaskets but I have the o'rings in the block. I used to run the O'ring head gaskets but switch over to the copper because of the NOS I was running.

I cut the grove out of the heads... I don't think its as good having the grove in the head when running copper head gaskets.

IP: Logged

kid vishus
Gearhead

Posts: 6098
From: middle of NC
Registered: Oct 2000

posted 06-04-2003 10:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for kid vishus   Click Here to Email kid vishus     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I don't know anything about copper head gaskets.

I do know that most people say to have your quench height between .035 (with GOOD rods) and .045.

IP: Logged

'69Stang
Gearhead

Posts: 205
From: Detroit, MI USA
Registered: Jan 2002

posted 06-05-2003 10:45 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for '69Stang   Click Here to Email '69Stang     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
My engine is hardly in the hole because it was zero decked, and I have flat top pistons. The gasket I ordered is .032. Should that work or should I order the .043 gasket? Compression comes out to ~11:1 with this set up.

IP: Logged

steve'66
Gearhead

Posts: 8826
From: Sonoma,CA,USA
Registered: Mar 2000

posted 06-05-2003 10:54 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for steve'66   Click Here to Email steve'66     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'd get the .043 gaskets, so your pistons don't hit your heads at 7,000 rpms.

SteveW

IP: Logged

kid vishus
Gearhead

Posts: 6098
From: middle of NC
Registered: Oct 2000

posted 06-05-2003 11:01 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for kid vishus   Click Here to Email kid vishus     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
That's tight, especially with stock rods. I have ran with .035 quench, but that was with domed pistons. And when I took that motor apart, there were shiny places in the chambers and on the pistons where they were "touching".

If you don't turn it over 7k, it should be ok with the flat tops. I would run it that way. BUT remember I like to walk the line of what is safe so what I would do might not be the best reference to go by. (Example, my motor has .065 int valve to piston clearance, and .075 exhuast and I see nothing wrong with that )

IP: Logged

'69Stang
Gearhead

Posts: 205
From: Detroit, MI USA
Registered: Jan 2002

posted 06-05-2003 12:56 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for '69Stang   Click Here to Email '69Stang     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Also, these heads have not been milled. Does that effect the picture?

Is the real issue piston to valve clearance?

[This message has been edited by '69Stang (edited 06-05-2003).]

IP: Logged

kid vishus
Gearhead

Posts: 6098
From: middle of NC
Registered: Oct 2000

posted 06-05-2003 01:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for kid vishus   Click Here to Email kid vishus     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by '69Stang:

Is the real issue piston to valve clearance?


Nope, the real issue is head to piston clearance. All rods will "stretch" a little in the upper rpms. The better the rod, the less stretch. Stock cleveland rods aren't bad, especially when compared to a stock sbc rod. But they don't compare with something like a Carrillo, or Oliver billet rod very well.

IP: Logged

'69Stang
Gearhead

Posts: 205
From: Detroit, MI USA
Registered: Jan 2002

posted 06-05-2003 01:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for '69Stang   Click Here to Email '69Stang     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Ahhhhhh, thank you. I wasn't so worried about the P/V clearance with my smaller cam (240/240, .588 lift, 112 LSA) but this makes sense.

Is it O.K. to run copper o-rings with copper head gaskets??

IP: Logged

kid vishus
Gearhead

Posts: 6098
From: middle of NC
Registered: Oct 2000

posted 06-05-2003 03:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for kid vishus   Click Here to Email kid vishus     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by '69Stang:
Is it O.K. to run copper o-rings with copper head gaskets??

I don't know.

IP: Logged

steve'66
Gearhead

Posts: 8826
From: Sonoma,CA,USA
Registered: Mar 2000

posted 06-05-2003 05:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for steve'66   Click Here to Email steve'66     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Check this,
http://www.headgasket.com/faq.html#q8

SteveW

IP: Logged

steve'66
Gearhead

Posts: 8826
From: Sonoma,CA,USA
Registered: Mar 2000

posted 06-06-2003 12:00 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for steve'66   Click Here to Email steve'66     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hope you read all that,

Copper o-rings on copper gaskests should be fine. Use a thin layer of silicone on the heads and block around the water passages. And use the .043 thick gaskets too.

SteveW

IP: Logged

'69Stang
Gearhead

Posts: 205
From: Detroit, MI USA
Registered: Jan 2002

posted 06-06-2003 02:10 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for '69Stang   Click Here to Email '69Stang     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yep Steve I read it, thanks alot for the info that settled it for me.

IP: Logged

Dynoram
Journeyman

Posts: 49
From: ford country
Registered: May 2003

posted 06-06-2003 08:02 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dynoram   Click Here to Email Dynoram     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Just a note make sure the water passages do seal with the silicon around the ports. last set i treid water ended up in all kinds of places.

IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Mustangsandmore Front Page

Copyright 2005, Steve LaRiviere. All Rights Reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47d

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

[Acronyms][Calendar][Chat][Classifieds] [Members' Pics]

[ Mustangsandmore.com Bookstore] [ Smokin' Fords] [Tech Articles]