Author
|
Topic: Which Head/Cam/Carb for a "hot" 393w daily-driver
|
Rustang351c Journeyman Posts: 45 From: Watkinsville, GA, USA Registered: Jun 2001
|
posted 01-29-2003 01:24 PM
Hello Guys,I'm building a motor for my 86' Mustang. It will be used for a daily driver and have a mild gear (3.27) I want the motor to have torque, be streetable, but still have as much top end as I can get. I am considering using a carb to keep the $ down. What: "Cam, Head, Carb, Intake" combination would you recommend for a very hot (choppy idle) 393w motor that will be driven all most even day. How much H.P. do you guess it will have. Thanks Thanks
IP: Logged |
Moneymaker Administrator Posts: 19704 From: Lyons, IL, USA Registered: May 99
|
posted 01-29-2003 02:54 PM
800 to 850 DP Holley.------------------ Alex Denysenko Co-Administrator and Moderator NHRA/IHRA/SRA member and licensed Superstock driver MCA member# 53321 NHRA and IHRA SS/LA National Record Holder '00,'01,'02,&'03 Fleet of FoMoCo products including 88 ASC McLaren Mustang #28 Professional Manwhore The Barry of BarrysGrrl Quote #1: "I never met a magazine mechanic I liked." Quote #2: "Make sure brain is in gear before engaging mouth!" Quote #3: "If you can't run with the big dogs, stay on the porch!" www.moneymakerracing.com
IP: Logged |
SteveLaRiviere Administrator Posts: 33371 From: Saco, Maine Registered: May 99
|
posted 01-29-2003 03:27 PM
What is your budget?------------------ '70 Mustang Mach 1 - '72 Mustang Sprint - '94 F-150 Please remember our sponsors, Mustangs Plus, NPD, Osborn Reproductions, MyFordPerformance.com, and FordRamAir.com
IP: Logged |
Rustang351c Journeyman Posts: 45 From: Watkinsville, GA, USA Registered: Jun 2001
|
posted 01-29-2003 03:30 PM
For the whole motor, I was hoping to spend $5-7000.
IP: Logged |
SteveLaRiviere Administrator Posts: 33371 From: Saco, Maine Registered: May 99
|
posted 01-29-2003 03:43 PM
Using your 351C {in your name} or a 351W?------------------ '70 Mustang Mach 1 - '72 Mustang Sprint - '94 F-150 Please remember our sponsors, Mustangs Plus, NPD, Osborn Reproductions, MyFordPerformance.com, and FordRamAir.com
IP: Logged |
Rustang351c Journeyman Posts: 45 From: Watkinsville, GA, USA Registered: Jun 2001
|
posted 01-29-2003 04:34 PM
It is a 1977 351 windsor. I'm using a T-5 "world class"
IP: Logged |
MrWesson22 Gearhead Posts: 1209 From: Dacula, GA Registered: Sep 2000
|
posted 01-29-2003 05:09 PM
If you ever put slicks on it, and you drive it hard at all, you can kiss that T5 goodbye.Edit: I know multiple people that have fragged stock T5s with stock engines, and I know one guy that blew up a WC T5 with a car that dynoed at 280rwhp. It doesn't take much to break those trannies. ------------------ Neal 69 Gulfstream Aqua Grande 351C/4sp https://mustangsandmore.com/ubb/MrWesson22.html [This message has been edited by MrWesson22 (edited 01-29-2003).]
IP: Logged |
67Coupster Gearhead Posts: 179 From: Fortson, GA, USA Registered: Oct 2001
|
posted 01-29-2003 05:18 PM
I would recommend AFR185 heads and either a Victor Jr or the new Air Gap Performer intake. Not sure how your hood clearance is. I run the 185's and a Victor Jr. on my 393. The 205's weren't out yet or I would have chosen them since mine is a strip car. But they are 500hp capable out of the box if put with the right setup. I also run a 850dp and it seems to be a good fit for my combo. Again with the right combination the 393 is quite capable of making 500hp.------------------ James 67 Coupe 393W, 4 Speed,
IP: Logged |
two89w Gearhead Posts: 196 From: sydney australia Registered: Sep 2002
|
posted 01-30-2003 06:53 AM
sell the t5 get a tremmec 3550 or tko, afr 185 heads, comp cams 282s,air gap manifold
IP: Logged |
Rustang351c Journeyman Posts: 45 From: Watkinsville, GA, USA Registered: Jun 2001
|
posted 01-30-2003 09:21 AM
Well, thanks Guys. Looks like the collective opinion is AFR 185's, AirGap, and 800-850 DP. Still not real sure on the Cam, but I was thinking one in the 2000-6000 range for manageable street. Yeah, I thought about a Tremec, but I heard they didn't shift well, clunky?
IP: Logged |
MrWesson22 Gearhead Posts: 1209 From: Dacula, GA Registered: Sep 2000
|
posted 01-30-2003 03:40 PM
The supplied shifters are sloppy, but Pro 5.0 makes nice, precise shifters for them. It's still not quite as smooth as a T5, but it does shift cleanly.
------------------ Neal 69 Gulfstream Aqua Grande 351C/4sp https://mustangsandmore.com/ubb/MrWesson22.html
IP: Logged |
Mpcoluv Gearhead Posts: 945 From: Charlotte NC usa Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 01-30-2003 04:00 PM
I'm suprised that no one has recomended the Roush 200 iron heads since the iron vs. aluminum debate. The Roush 200 heads are comparable (if ported and cleaned up) to the AFR 185 heads. Cheaper too.....
IP: Logged |
stroker man Gearhead Posts: 113 From: Denville NJ USA Registered: Mar 2002
|
posted 01-30-2003 08:07 PM
yup im using the roush heads fully ported they will just as much power and more on my 408, did a lot of planning between the two heads, alum and cast from very smart engine guys the cast iron for street car is the way to go.
IP: Logged |
two89w Gearhead Posts: 196 From: sydney australia Registered: Sep 2002
|
posted 01-31-2003 02:07 AM
yes, i find my tremmec a little notchy on the street side of driving but its really not noticable considering the exhaust noise,cam noise,heat,loud carbs.....love it
IP: Logged |
Rustang351c Journeyman Posts: 45 From: Watkinsville, GA, USA Registered: Jun 2001
|
posted 01-31-2003 08:16 AM
Yeah, thats what the "old man" builder said here in my town too, iron over alum on street, but like everyone said Victor Jr. and/or AFR's flow better than World. ...Then if you pay for (and can find) a good port job for World Heads, they're as much or more than the Alum. ones!?! So, "StrokerMan", these new Roush (world) heads, do they need porting right out of the box as well? Did "right cast" technology do anything for them?
IP: Logged |
68DARKHORSE Gearhead Posts: 337 From: Austin, Tx Registered: Aug 2002
|
posted 01-31-2003 10:06 AM
Seems like it comes down to how you use your car. If you depend on your car, get iron. I got a set of Vic Jrs because my car is hardly driven, but driven hard.
IP: Logged |
Rustang351c Journeyman Posts: 45 From: Watkinsville, GA, USA Registered: Jun 2001
|
posted 01-31-2003 10:20 AM
10-4, well I would be depending on it. Hum, so the miss-match in expansion rates of Alum & iron breaks things....eventually.Anyone.. Do the new Roush 200 Heads need porting and/or polishing, or are they useable as is? (hum, Mpcoluv says not, but the little sales blurb says they are)
IP: Logged |
Rustang351c Journeyman Posts: 45 From: Watkinsville, GA, USA Registered: Jun 2001
|
posted 01-31-2003 10:34 AM
Ok, I just read a message about the Roush heads. So all they need is a very light de-burring. Not like "porting". I think I could do that myself? (I ruined a set of 351c heads before trying it) ((just a little more, just a little more....lol))
IP: Logged |
68DARKHORSE Gearhead Posts: 337 From: Austin, Tx Registered: Aug 2002
|
posted 01-31-2003 10:42 AM
Roush took the World heads and put alot of effort into optimizing them. I would just clean them up as needed and go.
IP: Logged |
rockafellz Gearhead Posts: 1291 From: San Lorenzo, CA, USA Registered: Aug 2001
|
posted 01-31-2003 11:37 AM
A little additional info on Roush 200s.http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2001/09/roush200/index.shtml http://www.worldcastings.com/tech/WindsorJrTech.pdf http://www.worldcastings.com/tech/WindsorTechInfo.pdf Roush 180 Windsor JR http://www.worldcastings.com/docs/catalog/pg18.pdf Roush 200 Windsor SR http://www.worldcastings.com/docs/catalog/pg20.pdf Erik ------------------ 1966 Ford Mustang 2+2 Mine - Restomod in Progress 1966 Ford Mustang Coupe Dad's - Original Unrestored [This message has been edited by rockafellz (edited 01-31-2003).]
IP: Logged |
stroker man Gearhead Posts: 113 From: Denville NJ USA Registered: Mar 2002
|
posted 01-31-2003 03:05 PM
im fully porting mine to flow with the 408, i saw a pair for a guy who is using them on a small stroker and flowed real good numbers.
IP: Logged |