Author
|
Topic: Jetting changes for higher altitudes?
|
steve'66 Gearhead Posts: 3653 From: Sonoma,CA,USA Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 09-26-2001 06:35 PM
Melissa will be racing in Las Vegas in a couple weeks. How many jet sizes smaller should we put in the 750 holley. We use 83/88 at sea-level now. BTW Vegas is just over 2,000 feet elevation. Thanks guys!SteveW
IP: Logged |
Butch Jennings Gearhead Posts: 340 From: California Registered: Apr 2000
|
posted 09-26-2001 08:24 PM
If it were me, I'd go 81/87 and put another degree of timing in it right off the trailer------------------ Butch 460 powered 1967 Comet Cyclone 10.271 @ 130.069 Butcher's Home Page "Friends don't let friends drive Chevys"
IP: Logged |
steve'66 Gearhead Posts: 3653 From: Sonoma,CA,USA Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 09-27-2001 12:38 AM
Thanks Butch,That's what I was thinking, about 2 sizes smaller and more timing. You know how the ET finals are, there won't be many practice runs. SteveW
IP: Logged |
steve'66 Gearhead Posts: 3653 From: Sonoma,CA,USA Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 09-29-2001 11:27 PM
If anyone is interested, Team Sacramento is advising their members to tune for 4000-5000 feet if the temp is above 90 in Vegas. They recomend 4 jet sizes smaller, lower octane fuel, more timing, and a "power adder" if your car needs the punch to launch. I remember talking to a few Vegas team racers last year (when it was at Sears Point) that couldn't believe how well their cars ran at our track. Most were about .6 seconds quicker here. I guess we're gonna run 13's for the finals. SteveW
IP: Logged |
Just Jim Gearhead Posts: 373 From: So Cal Registered: Feb 2000
|
posted 09-30-2001 12:12 PM
Sounds like typical conditions for LACR. 2 jet sizes smaller should be OK,but I don't know why you would need lower octane fuel.Just remember it's a bracket race and as long as the car is consistent don't worry if it isn't as fast as it could be.Good luck to Melissa. ------------------ "Just Falcon Around" 1962 Falcon 351W 1958 Morris Minor 289
IP: Logged |