Author
|
Topic: Mustang Plus・Please read!
|
Stan Gearhead Posts: 159 From: Castro Valley, CA Registered: Jul 99
|
posted 05-11-2006 09:32 AM
Tallked with Ron B about this the other day. This really sucks! http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060510/MONEY/605100302 ------------------ President of Bay Area Mustang Association・2003-05 1965 Fastback 2001 GT 1966 Coupe http://www.bayareamustangassociation.org/
IP: Logged |
Moneymaker Administrator Posts: 28335 From: Lyons, IL, USA Registered: May 99
|
posted 05-11-2006 09:44 AM
F*cking bullsh*t! ------------------ Alex Denysenko Co-Administrator and Moderator NHRA/SRA member and licensed Superstock driver NHRA and IHRA SS/LA & SS/MA National Record Holder '00,'01,'02,'03,'04 &'05 First NHRA & IHRA 289 automatic Superstock Mustang in the TENS 06-99 First SS/MA in the TENS 04-03 IHRA division 5 Superstock Champion Fleet of FoMoCo products including 88 ASC McLaren Mustang #28 The Barry of BarrysGrrl Quote #1: "I never met a magazine mechanic I liked." Quote #2: "Make sure brain is in gear before engaging mouth!" Quote #3: "If you can't run with the big dogs, stay on the porch!" www.moneymakerracing.com
IP: Logged |
capri man Gearhead Posts: 8114 From: doerun, ga. Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 05-11-2006 10:45 AM
https://mustangsandmore.com/ubb/Forum14/HTML/020891.html------------------ mike r racing is real everything else is just a game. 81 capri-302-7.25 @93mph 1/8 1.54 60ft 50 % of the fun dragracing is meeting people who will give you the shirt off their back to wipe the grease off your hands. M&M member #839 http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y6/mike470/adel2.jpg
IP: Logged |
rmousir Gearhead Posts: 834 From: Amelia, Ohio Registered: May 2003
|
posted 05-11-2006 10:53 AM
That is just wrong. It is independent companies like Mustangs+ that help to promote the Ford product. I don't see how ford can do that. Or even why they would. I would think that they would want more companies like that. No wonder why Ford is hurting with the attitude they have. That is a shameful way for a company like Ford to act. Mustangs+ ROCKS! What can we do to help? Richard.
IP: Logged |
RICKS Gearhead Posts: 407 From: Ocala, FL Registered: Mar 2001
|
posted 05-11-2006 01:20 PM
What a nightmare. These types of attacks by Ford have been ongoing for years now, this is just the first time you've seen a Mustang parts supplier get the cannon aimed at them... Back in 1976 my dad decided on a name that did not paint him into any corner, either geographically, or by product line, not knowing what the future would bring, and not wanting to limit himself to just one car. I've gotta remind him how wise he was back then, it's sure saved us from a nightmare. But even beyond the name of the company, ALL OF US in this industry are wondering what Ford's attorneys are going to try to do next. Already, if you look at the cover of your latest NPD catalog, you can see the disclaimer we have in place, and the precise wording we use prior to the use of "Mustang". We've been playing it as safe as we can figure it, but it seems there's no limit to the corporate stupidity at hand here. It would be one thing if this industry were so poorly represented, that it created a blemish or black eye for the Mustang name. But that's not the case at all. This industry et al does a wonderful job by its customers, and a wonderful job helping keep those classics pristine, preserving the American tradition that is Mustang, such that Ford actually has a living legacy remaining to cash in on with its newest retro designs. Without us having kept all those cars on the road, and on the showfields, in front of the kids, there would be no Mustang today as you see it. Anyhow, this is sad news to see. Sad that a company like Ford is so shortsighted. Henry is doing backflips in his grave. But don't think this type of behavior is limited to Ford. Classic Industries and Original Parts Group used to have trademarked Chevy names in their names. They switched up back in the late 80's, due to a foul odor they began smelling downwind from Michigan. A letter-writing campaign helped save the Mustang from a front-wheel-drive Mazda-powered fate in the late 80's. Maybe the MCA could organize a similar effort today.
IP: Logged |
silverblueBP Journeyman Posts: 41 From: Bend, Oregon Registered: Oct 2005
|
posted 05-11-2006 01:39 PM
I have sent Ford (Corporate) an email stating my opinion on this. We'll see what they have to say....if anything ;^)------------------ Mark 1966 Mustang 2+2 Details here: http://www.cardomain.com/ride/667160
IP: Logged |
kinger44 Gearhead Posts: 293 From: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada Registered: Sep 2004
|
posted 05-11-2006 02:30 PM
You know, I have always wondered how all of these companies were allowed to use the Mustang name. I have been so amazed at how many aftermarket Mustang suppliers there are, and most have Mustang in their name. I can't believe that after all these years they would do this and tick off their most loyal fan base - US! They aren't selling parts for classic Stangs, so where is the gain for them?This is almost as bad as the Olympics and Super Bowl names! Hey Alex, you got a letter yet? Will this place have to become "blueovalponycarsandmore"??? ------------------ 68 coupe, red on black. FULL RESTORATION UNDERWAY!!! http://mustangsandmore.50megs.com/MembersPics/kinger44.html [This message has been edited by kinger44 (edited 05-11-2006).]
IP: Logged |
69 Sportsroof Gearhead Posts: 2518 From: Valley, Alabama, USA Registered: Mar 2002
|
posted 05-11-2006 04:07 PM
I'm kind of on the fence with this issue. I can see Ford's point. Afterall, the parts folks are selling under the Mustang name aren't even produced by Ford so they aren't receiving any direct revenue from the use of their trademark. On the other hand, as mentioned these parts do allow us to keep our cars on the road and in view of the buying public. Folks are flocking to buy the new Mustangs because they want a cool looking car that has great performance without having to get their hands dirty.The Schmidt's had the right idea. Good for them and good for us.
IP: Logged |
gmliebau Gearhead Posts: 557 From: Port St. Lucie, FL Registered: Jan 2004
|
posted 05-11-2006 05:39 PM
So should every vendor that uses the word "Mustang" in their name start to worry? What about the web forums? Are we in trouble here at Mustangs and More? Should I even say the word?.....MUSTANGCome and get me!!! What a waste of time & money. Maybe Ford will start selling aftermarket resotration parts and charging twice the amount as everyone else.
IP: Logged |
SugarlandStang Journeyman Posts: 29 From: Sugar Land, TX Registered: Dec 2005
|
posted 05-11-2006 11:19 PM
The Ford corporation is really ticking me off. First they decide to be a pro-homosexual corporation, ie. funding "gay marriage day" in Detroit, and now this... No wonder they are losing money. Until the stock holders fire the CEO, this kind of stupidity will continue.
IP: Logged |
Darryl Eichenlaub Journeyman Posts: 42 From: Buckley,Wa. Registered: Dec 2005
|
posted 05-12-2006 01:25 AM
This is an ugly situation, one aspect no one mention, is Ford got bit by the same bug when Carroll Shelby sued. He won his case and Ford couldn't use Cobra and GT350 without paying. Now he has made money hand over fist. His name now on anything get as 4x as much with out. The sad thing about all of this is it comes down to the almighty buck. When this is all said and done the CEO will be making millions and the lawyers will be getting rich. ------------------ Darryl Eichenlaub 1965 Mustang Coupe restomod 289,c4,body and interior mods. 1956 F-100 460,c6,9" major body mods, on going project. 1967 Mustang Fastback, father/son project 5.0,5spd,9". 1975 F250 4x4 Highboy 390,4spd,35",custom paint. 2002 Mustang v6,5spd, daughters college ride. 2001 Ford Escape, Wifes grocery getter.
IP: Logged |
senzstang Gearhead Posts: 406 From: perry, oh, usa Registered: May 2002
|
posted 05-12-2006 08:27 AM
quote: Originally posted by Darryl Eichenlaub: . The sad thing about all of this is it comes down to the almighty buck. When this is all said and done the CEO will be making millions and the lawyers will be getting rich.
So true. And sadly, a hard working guy like Mustangs Plus owner is going to take in the tailpipe. I think I am going to order something from MustangsPlus just to lend some support. Phil
IP: Logged |
Blacksmith Gearhead Posts: 249 From: Front Royal, Va., USA Registered: Feb 2006
|
posted 05-12-2006 08:36 AM
quote: Originally posted by gmliebau: Should I even say the word?.....MUSTANGCome and get me!!! What a waste of time & money. Maybe Ford will start selling aftermarket resotration parts and charging twice the amount as everyone else.
Better get ALL your parts while you still can. Ed, Shelby's Goons are liable to come after us too... We can always refer to our cars as Rustangs. That IS what most of them were before we got ahold of them anyway...
IP: Logged |
gmliebau Gearhead Posts: 557 From: Port St. Lucie, FL Registered: Jan 2004
|
posted 05-12-2006 03:32 PM
hehe. I've only got a few emblems to get. Maybe less than $100 worth of stuff....and for the record, my car hasn't a single spec of rust on it. I WILL NOT refer to it as a Rustang. hehe... Muttang maybe.
IP: Logged |
sigtauenus Gearhead Posts: 3425 From: Va Beach Registered: Jun 2000
|
posted 05-13-2006 05:05 PM
My letter, which will go in the mail Monday. Not sure if it will do anything or not, but as has been posted over at Sam's Place, an old fashioned letter with an ink signature will hold more water than anything sent via email. I'm thinking I'll send one to each of them...William Clay Ford, Jr. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ONE AMERICAN ROAD DEARBORN MI 48126 William Clay Ford, Director Emeritus FORD MOTOR COMPANY ONE AMERICAN ROAD DEARBORN MI 48126 Dear Mr. Ford, I am writing to express my concern about the recent actions of your legal department with regard to the protection of the Mustang trademark. I consider myself to be an avid Mustang enthusiast, and currently own two of them, one a 1968 Mustang fastback, and the other a 2003 Mustang Mach 1. Although I have to admit that my interest in Mustangs was founded in the classic 65-68 styling, the recent styling changes have renewed my interest in the new models. These are not the only Ford products I currently own or have owned, but are representative of the fact that I am a loyal Ford customer, particularly in regard to the Mustang. The information I am receiving is that Ford・s legal department is taking action against businesses that have the word ・Mustang・ as part of their business name, webpage, or other advertising mediums. This action requires the business to not only change their name, but destroy any and all property that displays that name, and remit $10,000 to Ford Motor Company. My concern with this action lies in the fact that I rely upon these businesses to provide me with restoration parts for my 1968 Mustang. This legal action will not only make it harder to locate businesses that specifically cater to the Mustang restoration hobby, but will make all of my future purchases more expensive as the action Ford is taking will incur significant expenses that will likely be passed on to the consumer. As a loyal consumer, I am personally offended by this legal action that is being taken against businesses that cater to the Mustang and consider it a huge ・slap in the face.・ Considering the success of the Mustang and the intense loyalty of Mustang owners, the legal action being taken is seen as Ford Motor Company ・cutting off the hand that feeds it.・ I see this action as an attack on the very businesses that have maintained the classic Mustang and propelled the success of current models with the promotion of popular aftermarket products. I understand the need to protect the Mustang trademark, particularly in light of the highly publicized debacles surrounding the names ・Futura・, ・GT-40・, and ・Cobra.・ I also understand the need to protect Ford from damages that may be incurred due to the misuse of the trademark ・Mustang,・ due to its common association with Ford Motor Company. I feel that a more prudent method of protecting that trademark, as it applies to business that cater to the Mustang hobby, would be the official licensing of the ・Mustang・ name as it is incorporated in any existing and future business names. This is particularly important to businesses that sell Mustang parts, keeping our cars on the road longer (effectively free advertising for Ford in regard to product longevity), businesses that promote the Mustang such as magazines (also effectively free advertising for the Mustang), and businesses that actually manufacture the reproduction or aftermarket parts. I would like to suggest that a license be issued to any legitimate business that promotes the Ford Mustang in a positive manner for the sum of one dollar. This would allow for existing businesses to continue operating as they have with no impact to the consumer, and allow for Ford Motor Company to protect the ・Mustang・ trademark through an appropriate licensing process. I would also like to add that as an informed consumer, I am also aware of the recent awards your legal department, particularly the intellectual property group. I would like to offer sincere congratulations on their success and I share your pride with their performance. However, I would also like to caution you that the actions they take to protect Ford intellectual property need to be taken with prudence so as not to alienate loyal customers. Please consider this letter as an appeal from a loyal customer looking for Ford Motor Company to amend its current legal tactics with regard to actions taken against Mustang related businesses and thus retain me as a loyal customer. Without a public change in legal tactics, I cannot say with confidence that my next purchase will be a Ford product. Please feel free to contact me at the above address, telephone___________, or email ____________________ if you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter. Repecfully, _________________
IP: Logged |
Jimmy Ray Gearhead Posts: 196 From: Virginia Beach Va. Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 05-13-2006 06:25 PM
Nicely done.....Mine goes like this; tHIS IS CRAP PLEASE STOP OR i'LL STOPE spending my stolen fOODSTAMP MONEYS.. TO BUY MANY fORDS....
IP: Logged |
Fastback68 Gearhead Posts: 4247 From: Sucat, Paranaque, Philippines Registered: Jul 99
|
posted 05-13-2006 07:05 PM
Heh Sam, just one part that doesn't ring true ... quote: I would also like to add that as an informed consumer, I am also aware of the recent awards your legal department, particularly the intellectual property group. I would like to offer sincere congratulations on their success and I share your pride with their performance.
Are you really proud of Ford's legal department? If not, I'd rephrase that.
IP: Logged |
sigtauenus Gearhead Posts: 3425 From: Va Beach Registered: Jun 2000
|
posted 05-13-2006 11:13 PM
Well, I'm not known for having much tact. It was an attempt to remain positive about my view of Ford while telling the owner his @#$% stinks.
IP: Logged |
mellowyellow Gearhead Posts: 7619 From: So. Fl. Registered: Aug 2000
|
posted 05-14-2006 02:17 PM
Great letter but Simon brings up a key point.How could anyone "share your pride" but then.........?? After all, pride goeth before a fall. Leave Billybob to his own pride.If would be pretty hard to share his pride in that he's got his 'up to the pits' waders on wallowing in the family name of Ford and that HE'S the real McCoy! That is really a major prob with FMC. Apparently a "Ford" can't be ousted!
IP: Logged |
inline6.1 Gearhead Posts: 139 From: s NJ Registered: Nov 2004
|
posted 05-15-2006 09:03 PM
Yeah sounds like ford is having its period! But what i would like to know is if there going to go after any other company's. Lets see MustangsUnlimited, DallasMustang, John's mustang, Mustang Depot. Don't they understand that there pissing off loyal ford customers, why fight amongst ourselves when we should be fighting against chevy's and **** box dodge.
IP: Logged |