Posts: 399 From: Long Beach, Ca 1966 A-Code Coupe Registered: Feb 2002
posted 01-01-2003 01:20 PM
how come lots of you have 351W or C and none of them are stroked? you all want more power, but none of you stroke it.. just curious.
some swap the 351 into 65/66's and dont stroke! im just scratching my head on this one.
Posts: 167 From: St. Louis, MO Registered: Jul 2001
posted 01-01-2003 04:18 PM
I decided against stroking my 351 because of the additional charges I suffered when I stroked my SB Chevy. Had to cut notches in the block, dig up some 6 inch rods to fix the angle problem 5.7 rods made. Not to mention buying a crank. On one hand I spent gobs of money to make 35 - 40 more HP. On the other the motor ran like it had the flattest power curve in the world from 3000 to 6500 RPM.
Is it easier with a Ford Motor? I thought my money was better spent on balancing and higher quality parts.
Posts: 763 From: Charlotte NC usa Registered: Apr 2001
posted 01-01-2003 05:11 PM
I have a stroker 372C. Just haven't sorted the whole car out enough to brag about it yet. I would do a 392C if I started with a cleveland today. I would do a 392W if I started from scratch.....
[This message has been edited by Mpcoluv (edited 01-01-2003).]
Posts: 274 From: Middlebury, IN USA Registered: Dec 2000
posted 01-01-2003 08:20 PM
$$$$$$$$$$$$$ I had planned on stroking my 351W to at least 393 or I even thought about 427 UNTIL I added up how much money I had already spent on everything else!!! SO, Maybe in a couple of years, but first I need to get what I have finished and on the road.
------------------ Have a Wonderful Day CandyApple 65 Fastback 351W, 4 Speed Versaille 9" Rear End Global West Front End [email protected]