Author
|
Topic: Tremec in place of a Toploader...
|
n2oMike Gearhead Posts: 1641 From: Spencer, WV Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted 12-14-2002 03:23 PM
How many of you have considered this? Overdrive would be nice. I'll probably not really do this, but it looks like all that's really needed is a spacer to go behind the bellhousing. The Tremec has the same bolt pattern as the toploader, and the input shaft of the standad Tremec uses the small toploader (1-1/16" 10 spline) design, but the shaft is a little longer. To use a Tremec behind a toploader bellhousing, a spacer plate must be used. McLeod sells these. It's on page 4 of their online catalog. http://www.mcleodind.com/catalog.PDF Part #8624 is their standard small block toploader bellhousing. Part #8625 is the same unit, but comes with a spacer plate for use with a Tremec. The part number of the spacer all by itself is #8607. I would say the spacer could be used with an FE (or other) toploader bellhousing as well. I'd call McLeod to get the details. If you want to step up to the strongest version of the Tremec, the TKO, or even the TKO II, you get a large input shaft and big 31 spline output. These later Tremecs are STRONG, and will hold up to some serious torque. (the standard Tremec should be fine for anything without slicks, and most cars with them) I belive these TKO trannys even come with the larger slipyoke included. There are several knowledgable places to purchase these transmissions. One is D&D, another is Hanlon Motorsports. http://www.hanlonmotorsports.com/ Hanlon offers a cable clutch conversion for early Ford mechanical applications. Mustang Steve offers a conversion at a good price. Here is a write-up with pictures of his product. http://www.mustangsteve.com/cable.html Good Luck! ------------------ Mike Burch 66 mustang real street 302 4-speed 289 heads 10.63 @ 129.3 http://www.geocities.com/carbedstangs/cmml_mburch.html http://www.fortunecity.com/silverstone/healey/367 http://www.mustangworks.com/cgi-bin/moi-display.cgi?220 [This message has been edited by n2oMike (edited 12-15-2002).] [This message has been edited by n2oMike (edited 12-15-2002).]
IP: Logged |
rm302 boss Moderator Posts: 649 From: Austin Texas Registered: Dec 2002
|
posted 12-14-2002 09:55 PM
i agree a tremec is a great transmission but, keep in mind your car will have to be modified in a way you may not like... The tremec has a much taller case and the trans tunnel support will have to be cut out of the car(well most of it any ways) you need to know this before installing one. the rear mount and cross membe will also have to be modified as well due to the length. A good friend cut up his 69 Boss 302 to put one of these in a few years ago.
IP: Logged |
V8 Thumper Gearhead Posts: 3603 From: Orange, Ca. United States of America Registered: Dec 2001
|
posted 12-14-2002 11:30 PM
Cut up a Boss 302? I wasn't aware of that trans' girth... bummer First gear is real low anyway, isn't it? Like 3.xx~ something? ------------------ 1965 GT coupe, 333ci aluminum headed/solid cammed stroker, four speed, 3.70:1 9" All Blue Oval, no blue bottle http://mustangsandmore.50megs.com/V8Thumper.html
IP: Logged |
kcode Gearhead Posts: 2683 From: alvaton,ky,usa Suburb of Bowling Green, M&M #79, MCA #29208 Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 12-14-2002 11:50 PM
To put a Tremec in a 65-66 body the top support around the trans tunnel has to be sectioned.If you don't want the spacer, the input shaft can be shortened by a competent machine shop. Just my $.02 worth. My T-5 has held up so far behind the 347 but will be soon be replaced by a T-5-Z with the 2.95 first gear. The current 3.35 is too much. ------------------ Mike Golliver MCA Gold Card Judge-Modifieds 65 Kcode coupe 347 stroker modified 5-speed MCA Retired 66 convertible-3 dueces and a 5-speed with a 289 89 T-Bird Super coupe 01 Mustang GT Convt [This message has been edited by kcode (edited 12-14-2002).]
IP: Logged |
amartin725 Gearhead Posts: 111 From: Attleboro, MA Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 12-15-2002 12:44 AM
Also available out there in the market is a new input shaft for the Tremec that is shorter and allows it to be directly bolted to the Toploader bell with no adapter.Al ------------------ Turd's Rule!! 200/3-spd "200 & 250 Head Under the Knife"
IP: Logged |
Mpcoluv Gearhead Posts: 1004 From: Charlotte NC usa Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 12-15-2002 10:35 AM
Are the tunnel mods only required for some 65/66 stangs? On my '69 I seem to have plenty of room above the toploader.....
IP: Logged |
n2oMike Gearhead Posts: 1641 From: Spencer, WV Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted 12-15-2002 11:08 AM
Here's a page that shows trans dimensions and gear ratios.The Tremec's input shaft is 7.2" long from the front of the trans case, the small block (long pilot shaft) toploader is around 6.5". Big block (short pilot shaft) toploaders are 3/8" shorter @ around 6.125" Dan Williams Toploaders says you can use a small block (long pilot shaft) toploader behind a big block, but I've heard of people bottoming the input shaft into the crank doing this with some combos as well. The McLeod spacer should be plenty for big block cars, but I'd trial fit the tranny with some clay on the front of the input to double check clearance to be sure. If it's too tight, all you have to do is shave a little off the front of the shaft with a grinder. http://www.hanlonmotorsports.com/3550.html Good Luck! ------------------ Mike Burch 66 mustang real street 302 4-speed 289 heads 10.63 @ 129.3 http://www.geocities.com/carbedstangs/cmml_mburch.html http://www.fortunecity.com/silverstone/healey/367 http://www.mustangworks.com/cgi-bin/moi-display.cgi?220 [This message has been edited by n2oMike (edited 12-15-2002).] [This message has been edited by n2oMike (edited 12-15-2002).]
IP: Logged |
rm302 boss Moderator Posts: 649 From: Austin Texas Registered: Dec 2002
|
posted 12-15-2002 11:30 AM
How do you like the T-5 i am geeting ready to do the same from a T-10 to a T-5. I need that 5th gear,i have 3.89 in the rear and it gets up there dam fast. Any hints you want to share like is it better to go with a cable clutch,hyd or old z bar stock?
IP: Logged |
kcode Gearhead Posts: 2683 From: alvaton,ky,usa Suburb of Bowling Green, M&M #79, MCA #29208 Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 12-15-2002 10:18 PM
Two things that I suggest doing with a T-5 conversion. First make sure you use a front yoke for a T-5. Second, throw away the stock shifter and get a Pro 5.0 shifter. Might have to open up the trans tunnel opening a little for the shifter to fit, but its well worth it.I'm using the stock Z-bar, which I prefer, you will get arguments on all clutch mechanics, which is better?. I just like the old style. I also used the 5/8 spacer plate with a stock old vintage bellhousing on both my 65 and 66. Mike
IP: Logged |
69 Sportsroof Gearhead Posts: 1226 From: Valley, Alabama, USA Registered: Mar 2002
|
posted 12-15-2002 10:26 PM
quote: Originally posted by rm302 boss: i am geeting ready to do the same from a T-10 to a T-5.
What 'cha gonna do with that T-10 when you take it out?
IP: Logged |
Daniel Jones Gearhead Posts: 503 From: St. Louis, MO Registered: Aug 99
|
posted 12-16-2002 12:15 PM
> If you want to step up to the strongest version of the Tremec, the TKO, > or even the TKO II, you get a large input shaft and big 31 spline output. Yes, the TKO's have a 1 1/8" diameter, 26 spline big block Chevy style input shaft (requires a Chevy clutch disc) and a C6 style 31 spline output shaft. Note that you still use a small block Ford pilot bushing. > I belive these TKO trannys even come with the larger slipyoke included. Yes, my TKO came with a C6 yoke. > To put a Tremec in a 65-66 body the top support around the trans tunnel > has to be sectioned. My '66 didn't require anything of the sort. The Tremec TKO cleared the transmission tunnel without any problems. Thanks to the internal rail shifter, there are no shift rods on the side so width is not an issue. Things are tightest on top, but I used a JBA crossmember (tubular with parking brake) that cants the tail end of the transmission down to provide the required vertical clearance. To install the transmission, the shifter must be removed (use a piece of duct tape to cover hole from tunnel crud) which requires the lateral shifter pivots be tightened after the transmission is installed. The front pivot bolt requires an obstruction box wrench to reach, otherwise everything is easy to get to. I don't know if JBA is still selling the mounts but I believe others (like Darkhorse) are. With my combination of engine, transmission, and rear end, I had to use wedge shims on the leaf spring mounts to get proper driveline phasing. Another guy I know had a TKO installed in his '69 behind a 428CJ. His installer opted to shim the trans mount to level the engine so the shaker hood scoop was at the proper angle. A little tunnel work was required in that case. > Are the tunnel mods only required for some 65/66 stangs? > On my '69 I seem to have plenty of room above the toploader..... No modifications necessary on my '66 fastback with Tremec TKO and scattershield. Dan Jones
IP: Logged |
Mpcoluv Gearhead Posts: 1004 From: Charlotte NC usa Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 12-16-2002 12:58 PM
I read somewhere (maybe on this site a while back) that one of the mustang production plants put the lateral stiffener in a different spot in the trans tunnel. Maybe this is the reason some say surgery is required, and some do not require it. From just eyeballing it, my '69 should have no trouble with a Tremec. In fact it begs for one......
IP: Logged |
rm302 boss Moderator Posts: 649 From: Austin Texas Registered: Dec 2002
|
posted 12-16-2002 02:22 PM
quote: Originally posted by 69 Sportsroof: What 'cha gonna do with that T-10 when you take it out?
Well the T-10 in the car i will keep just in case this does not work. I have another one that has a damaged 3rd gear and a loud reverse. i all ready have the rebuild kit with a new counter shaft and all new forks and sync's for it and now have no use for it. Rene
------------------ 1970 Boss 302 1990 Taurus SHO 1985 Mustang GT 351W 1995 Land rover Disco 1980 Triumph Spitfire (auto-X car)
IP: Logged |