|
Author
|
Topic: Hooker 6901 vs. Hedman 88300
|
deadhead
Gearhead Posts: 153
From:
Registered: Sep 2002
|
posted 09-05-2002 10:05 AM
   
I've got a '65 coop with 289-2v (for now), C-4, power steering (for maybe not too much longer) and 2.80 open rear. I'm looking primarily for a header that fits well. I've heard good things about both these headers. The Hooker's are only $35 more at Summit and are of 16 rather than 18 gauge construction. I'd think they would be a little quieter. But.., my first choice would be which ever one fits best. I don't want to cook my starter or have to dent them to get at the plugs. I plan to drop them in while the engine is still out being rebuilt, so I don't see installation as a problem. I'm looking for an experienced recommendation here. Anyone with a '65 who has used these please speak up. Positive or negative comments welcome, as well as any suggestions such as painting or not painting them. Thanks much, deadhead
IP: Logged |
Moneymaker
Administrator Posts: 19751
From: Lyons, IL, USA
Registered: May 99
|
posted 09-05-2002 10:27 AM
They both fit and perform well for economy headers. Either spend the money on the Hooker 6111 super comps, or if funds are a consideration then just buy the Hedmans. The cheapie Hookers are not worth the extra $35. I NEVER sell or install them. We always either use the Hedmans for cheapskates  , or the Hooker super comps for the high rollers.  ------------------
Alex Denysenko
Co-Administrator and Moderator/ non 65-66 Mustang owner sensitivity co-ordinator NHRA/IHRA/SRA/MCA member
NHRA and IHRA SS/LA National Record Holder '00, '01, & '02
Fleet of FoMoCo products including 88 ASC McLaren Mustang #28
Part time secret agent license #0089
Professional Manwhore
The Barry of BarrysGrrl Quote: "I never met a magazine mechanic I liked."
IP: Logged |
mustangs68
Moderator Posts: 18183
From: Hampton,Virginia,USA MCA#39406 M&M #12
Registered: May 99
|
posted 09-05-2002 11:29 AM
16 rather than 18 gauge construction. I'd think they would be a little quieter.don't bet on it
go with ALex suggestion the Hedmans.
IP: Logged |
Jeff
Gearhead Posts: 280
From: Moore, OK USA
Registered: Mar 2001
|
posted 09-05-2002 03:58 PM
I have Hooker 6901-1's on my '65 fastback. The fit of the header plate is very good and there's no problem whatsoever on the right side. I did wrap the starter cable with glass tape to ensure the end near the starter doesn't get crisp from the heat. I also use the little starter cable straps both in front and behind the motor mount. I have a late model block with clutch pivot adapter installed and also a 164 tooth bell housing that makes clearance more critical. These Hookers pass by the bell housing very close and wrap the clutch linkage z-bar with 2 tubes going below the z-bar and 2 tubes going over the z-bar. I use the CPC engine pivot adapter and I had to grind a little crescent shaped arc in the bracket to clear the header. You would not have this situation on an early 289/302. Header bolts are a bit of a pain to install but what headers don't on a small-block Ford? In summary, the Hookers are well made, well engineered and fit very well.
IP: Logged |
V8 Thumper
Gearhead Posts: 3529
From: Orange, Ca. United States of America
Registered: Dec 2001
|
posted 09-05-2002 05:49 PM
I've got 6111-1's in my '65 coupe, and with the exception of #2 primary needing just a minor contour to clear the shock tower, they fit like a glove. My block has been decked and I'm running aftermarket heads, so they might just glide right in for your application
IP: Logged |
71RESTO
Gearhead Posts: 1288
From: Oregon, USA
Registered: Oct 2000
|
posted 09-05-2002 08:42 PM
We just put a set of the Hedmann 88300's on my daughters '66 coupe w/289 without too much problem. Of course I had to get online here and find out I needed to jack the drivers side of the engine up from the motor mount, but then it fir perfect and runs great. We love them!!!!!!!!!------------------
Duane
71 Fastback (his) under resto (351C-4V C6 auto)
73 Mach 1 (hers) (351CJ 4 speed)
66 289/2V coupe (daughter Ashley's)
89 LX 2.3 convertible (daughter Amanda's)
M & M Member #730
IP: Logged |
Mustangsandmore Forums
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
