Author
|
Topic: Car Almost Destroyed!
|
JAAZZY Gearhead Posts: 772 From: Bay Area, CA Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 10-12-2001 05:24 PM
I was on my way down to the muffler shop to get my new mandrel bent pipes put in. I was day dreaming about the test runs I'd be doing as soon as it was done. I'm crusing on along and I feel a little surge but didn't think anything of it figuring the car was a bit cold. I go about another 1/4 mile and I see a little smoke. I pull right over but it's too late a fire has started under the hood. THANK GOD I carry a fire extinguisher. It took me about 15 seconds to get it unmounted from the roll cage and another 15 seconds to get the hood open and start spraying. In that short bit of time quite a bit of damage had already been done.Some of the wiring for the fuel injection is toast. The distributor cap has melted. The K&N filter looks like the leaning tower of Pizza. Worst of all, on one part of my hood about a 4" x 10" section of paint has been discolored. My paint is expensive so this is probably the worst part. I can wire up all new connectors for the fuel injection myself but I figure about 6 hours of work. The dist. is the Comp 9000 so I'm sure the parts will run $75 and you all know the K&N filters aren't free! I'll need to test it first but I also might need a new TPS for the injection. My engine compartment was very clean and I'm not sure I'll be able to get the burns rubbed off of everything, especially without removimg the intake manifold. Well what happened to cause all this?! A fuel line ruptured. I guess I'm still lucky though. If I hadn't had a fire extinguisher the car might have burned to the ground. If you don't have one and your ride is modded you might want to consider it.
IP: Logged |
I65Stang Gearhead Posts: 6217 From: Folsom, CA Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 10-12-2001 05:37 PM
Wow! I'm glad it wasnt worse! People always asked me why I carry a fire extinguisher in the '65 (they always ask "do you think its going to catch fire?"), thats why. Good luck on the redo.------------------ Tim M&M Member #35 1965 Mustang coupe, 200 I6, Holley 2300, Clifford header, true duals w/ 26" Smithys 1988 Mustang GT AOD vert, 15.810 @ 88.871 mph 100% stock w/ no traction 1976 Silverline Comoro 18' trihull ski boat, 188 hp 302 I/O, another toy http://all.at/mustang https://mustangsandmore.com/ubb/I65Stang.html
IP: Logged |
SteveLaRiviere Administrator Posts: 42139 From: Saco, Maine Registered: May 99
|
posted 10-12-2001 05:50 PM
Wow! Sorry that happened, but I'm glad it wasn't worse!Did you get burned? ------------------ '70 Mustang Mach 1 M code 351C 4V/FMX/3.25 open '72 Mustang Sprint Coupe 351C 4V/FMX/4.30 Trac Lok '94 F-150 XL 5.8L/E4OD/3.55 Limited Slip '97 Probe GTS 2.5L DOHC Be American, Drive American!
IP: Logged |
Ken Gearhead Posts: 4766 From: Prospect, Ct. M&M Member No. 31 MCA Member 49299 Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 10-12-2001 05:55 PM
Gee Jas, that sucks !!! Thankfully your alright...hope you get everything taken care of without spending a bunch.------------------ Conciousness - that annoying time between naps. Ken 1965 Springtime Yellow Coupe 302GT40-4spd Edlebrock RPM Air Gap 670cfm Holley Street Avenger and much, much MORE !!! www.mustangsandmore.com/ubb/Kens.html
IP: Logged |
Ryan Wilke Gearhead Posts: 2047 From: Stanton, Michigan 49707 Registered: Oct 2000
|
posted 10-12-2001 06:09 PM
Bummer, Jas! By the way -- If you were using a 'dry chemical' (white powder) fire extinguisher, make sure you clean ALL of the residue off of your ride. Although it puts out fires (which is a GOOD THING) the powder is a very coorosive material (a BAD THING) and will quickly EAT electrical connections, aluminum, etc. if left in the cracks and crevices of your engine bay. I'd try to vacuum up as much as you can, rather than trying to rinse it off with water or blow it out with air pressure; as those methods will only carry the residue extinguishant material to where you can't see it or get to it. Although these dry chemical units are cheap to buy & they do save your car from burning down to the ground; they can result in expensive damages if left in & on your ride. Good Luck! Ryan
IP: Logged |
SteveLaRiviere Administrator Posts: 42139 From: Saco, Maine Registered: May 99
|
posted 10-12-2001 06:14 PM
That's good to know, Ryan. Thanks.------------------ '70 Mustang Mach 1 M code 351C 4V/FMX/3.25 open '72 Mustang Sprint Coupe 351C 4V/FMX/4.30 Trac Lok '94 F-150 XL 5.8L/E4OD/3.55 Limited Slip '97 Probe GTS 2.5L DOHC Be American, Drive American!
IP: Logged |
JAAZZY Gearhead Posts: 772 From: Bay Area, CA Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 10-12-2001 06:40 PM
Guys thanks very much for your support. No I didn't get burned. I was out of the car very quickly just because I wanted to see what happened.Ryan, Thanks very much for that advice. I didn't know that. I vaccumed a lot of it out already but I don't think I can get all of it without washing. I'll vaccumm a few times before I wash it. I'll skip the blowing though based on your advice. Thanks again.
IP: Logged |
Fastymz Moderator Posts: 18143 From: Reno Nv USA MEM#1240 Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 10-12-2001 06:50 PM
JAAZZY I'm sorry to hear that.That really stinks,a least you were not hurt.And yes I'm going out and getting an extinguisher.Man that sounds like alot of work.Hope it dose not set you back to much. Ron------------------ 65 Coupe with a stock 1969 351w, Edelbrock RPM intake,carter625cfm,shorty Hedmen hedders,Black Magic electric fan,stock C4,peg leg 8" 2:80,Boss 429 hood scoop,Cragers SS,Black primer or Black Satin finish.
IP: Logged |
Dave Witthoeft Gearhead Posts: 2219 From: IL. Registered: Dec 2000
|
posted 10-12-2001 09:13 PM
I put out an engine fire once, (small one.) with a gallon of milk! Glad you weren't hurt. ------------------ MCA# 48755 71 Mach 1 69 Fastback 92 F-150 M&M#884
IP: Logged |
mellowyellow Gearhead Posts: 6609 From: So. Fl. Registered: Aug 2000
|
posted 10-12-2001 10:38 PM
Man! That DOES stink! Reading it, I thought about the fire extinguisher in my trunk-wondering why it's there and not where I can grab it. Feel bad about your paint getting ******!
IP: Logged |
mustangs68 Moderator Posts: 21889 From: Buckroe Beach Va MCA#39406 M&M #12 Member Mustang Club of Tidewater Registered: May 99
|
posted 10-12-2001 10:55 PM
Gald to hear your ok...did everyone listen..get a fire extinguisher. sam
IP: Logged |
kcode Gearhead Posts: 2983 From: alvaton,ky,usa Suburb of Bowling Green, M&M #79, MCA #29208 Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 10-13-2001 12:01 AM
I got a fire bottle from a local Fire Protection company, supposed to have some purple stuff in it that is non-corrosive. Hope they are right, haven't had to use it yet.Jaazzy, now for the big question, why did the fuel line rupture? What kind of fuel pressure were you running for the FI set-up. In my case when something breaks, it usually because I took a short cut, I hope this wasn't your situation. Mike
IP: Logged |
RonnieT Gearhead Posts: 821 From: Port Allen, La. 70767 Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 10-13-2001 12:15 AM
Check into the type of extinguisher you buy. Make sure it is a ABC fire extinguisher. Some of them are only good for 1 type of fire and will not do you much good for a gas fire. The dry chemical is about the best small extinguisher you can get for any vehicle fire. A Halon extinguisher is very good, but they are expensive and I hink they may be hard to find. Wash down several times after vacuuming up most of the powder, you have to get rid of ot some way.------------------ Ronnie 69 mach1 351W-4V 70 Torino GT 351C-4v with a "shaker" Mustangs and More Member #23
IP: Logged |
JAAZZY Gearhead Posts: 772 From: Bay Area, CA Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 10-13-2001 12:27 AM
It broke on a rubber line between the steel line and fuel pressure gauge. I think it may have gotten damaged internally while the motor was being put in because it broke from inside out. It figures that it wouldn't happen while I've got it running and am staring at the motor like I did at least a 6 times this week. The fuel pressure was only at about 17 psi. The Holley systems run at between 15-22psi. I used it at 15 with the 289 but it wasn't enough fuel for the 347.Ryan(or anyone that knows), Is the powder corrosive when dry or is it just when it mixes with moisture? quote: Originally posted by kcode: I got a fire bottle from a local Fire Protection company, supposed to have some purple stuff in it that is non-corrosive. Hope they are right, haven't had to use it yet.Jaazzy, now for the big question, why did the fuel line rupture? What kind of fuel pressure were you running for the FI set-up. In my case when something breaks, it usually because I took a short cut, I hope this wasn't your situation. Mike
[This message has been edited by JAAZZY (edited 10-13-2001).]
IP: Logged |
bluestreek Gearhead Posts: 1720 From: Athens,GA Registered: Jul 2001
|
posted 10-13-2001 12:53 AM
Really sorry to hear this Jazz.. I was watching the classic movie 'Christine' when I read this post.. Too bad cars can't really fix themselves.. I think you have given us all a good wake up call!!
IP: Logged |
Dan warren Gearhead Posts: 83 From: bothell Washington Registered: Aug 99
|
posted 10-13-2001 01:13 AM
I had heard that the additive in gasoline that been removed recently because of problems of getting in the water supply from leaky tanks. Will eat your gas line up in a few years or less.Was told that there is a new type of gas line to help with the problem. I have not seen it yet though.With the old line I think I would change it even if it didnt look bad or not every other year or less. Cheep insuranse.Ps Co2 extinguisers are expensive but they dont leave the white residue in your car. Dan------------------ 68 Shelby Gt 500 Conv.68 GT Fb 302 .84 Gt 350 5.0 Conv.
IP: Logged |
jkilroy Gearhead Posts: 1808 From: Vicksburg, MS Registered: Dec 99
|
posted 10-13-2001 01:22 AM
I can personally suggest you check into the Aeroquip push-lok type of hose. Its not the stainless stuff, and a lot cheaper. The hose is very VERY tough with at least 4 layers, including a woven fiberglass braid, and a tough outer shell. You could use it just like rubber fuel line with hose clamps if you want.If you want to use the fittings they are the kind you just push in and forget, they don't even need hose clamps up to 200 psi. And let me tell ya, anyone that thinks those type of fittings might leak have never tried pressing a -10 fitting in by hand. When I mean to tell you it took *all* I got to press in those fittings I mean ALL. If you want to remove one from the hose, cutting the hose off is the ONLY way. I plumbed up a remote oil filter and oil cooler and haven't had a single drop leak, and the motor runs about 80psi cold. I know its more than regular fuel line but it is a ton cheaper than stainless, much easier to install, and a whole lot of piece of mind. ------------------ Jay Kilroy 68' Fastback GT 390 "No such thing as a cam thats too big"
IP: Logged |
JAAZZY Gearhead Posts: 772 From: Bay Area, CA Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 10-13-2001 10:44 AM
I've never used anything but rubber hose. I need very little since I'm re-doing the whole thing in solid stainless fuel line. Can regular braided stainless line be used just like rubber hose with clamps? I'll probably need about 1 ft. on the supply and 1 ft on the return line.
IP: Logged |
jkilroy Gearhead Posts: 1808 From: Vicksburg, MS Registered: Dec 99
|
posted 10-13-2001 10:47 AM
Stainless hose is not 'supposed' to be used with clamps, but that doesn't mean it will not work, and I can't say that I have ever tried it. Let me know what you find out.------------------ Jay Kilroy 68' Fastback GT 390 "No such thing as a cam thats too big"
IP: Logged |
kcode Gearhead Posts: 2983 From: alvaton,ky,usa Suburb of Bowling Green, M&M #79, MCA #29208 Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 10-13-2001 11:26 AM
Jaazzy Do youself a favor, stay away from the rubber hose with FI. It will cost you more, but use the -AN fittings. The push-lok that Jay mentioned is good, so is the braided stainless. For safetys sake go with the good stuff.Mike
IP: Logged |
JAAZZY Gearhead Posts: 772 From: Bay Area, CA Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 10-13-2001 01:10 PM
Well I will need some type of adapter to from the stock line to the stainless. Is the stock line 3/8 or is it 5/16. Thanks
IP: Logged |
Dr. Who Gearhead Posts: 164 From: Redwood City, Ca. Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted 10-13-2001 02:13 PM
A braided line can be clamped with regular hose clamps if you cut the covering back so the clamp is on the hose and not the braid, sometimes you can clamp the whole mess but many times the frayed end of the cover will get into the clamp screw and seem tight but can leak or slip off.
IP: Logged |
Fastymz Moderator Posts: 18143 From: Reno Nv USA MEM#1240 Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 10-13-2001 04:35 PM
The stock line on my 65 5/16.------------------ 65 Coupe with a stock 1969 351w, Edelbrock RPM intake,carter625cfm,shorty Hedmen hedders,Black Magic electric fan,stock C4,peg leg 8" 2:80,Boss 429 hood scoop,Cragers SS,Black primer or Black Satin finish.
IP: Logged |
Butch Jennings Gearhead Posts: 622 From: No. California Registered: Apr 2000
|
posted 10-13-2001 07:45 PM
quote: Originally posted by JAAZZY: Well I will need some type of adapter to from the stock line to the stainless. Is the stock line 3/8 or is it 5/16. Thanks
Aeroquip makes a trick compression fitting to adapt a hard line to braided hose.
------------------ Butch 460 powered 1967 Comet Cyclone 10.271 @ 130.069 Butcher's Home Page "Friends don't let friends drive Chevys"
IP: Logged |
Dr. Who Gearhead Posts: 164 From: Redwood City, Ca. Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted 10-13-2001 10:09 PM
Butcher! Funny you should mention that. I just ordered a bunch of stuff to do the Mustang and one of those trick suckers was in the box. I don't think I ordered it (I'm old so I mighta) but your right it's just the ticket for hooking tube to line.
IP: Logged |
kcode Gearhead Posts: 2983 From: alvaton,ky,usa Suburb of Bowling Green, M&M #79, MCA #29208 Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 10-13-2001 10:23 PM
Jaazzy, With the 347 and FI setup you might want to consider going to at least a 3/8 line. It sounds like you are still using the stock 5/16. What you could do is run a new 3/8 line and keep the 5/16 for your return line. Just a thought....Mike
IP: Logged |
JAAZZY Gearhead Posts: 772 From: Bay Area, CA Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 10-13-2001 10:24 PM
Thanks guys! I'm now contemplating doing the whole thing in braided line. I was going to use hard stainless line but I guess this will be better. Thanks again.
IP: Logged |
JAAZZY Gearhead Posts: 772 From: Bay Area, CA Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 10-13-2001 10:28 PM
BTW, I remember someone saying there was a place to get stainless line that is pretty cheap. Can anyone post that again? Thanks
IP: Logged |
JAAZZY Gearhead Posts: 772 From: Bay Area, CA Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 10-17-2001 04:03 PM
I looked into cost, safety and looks and this is what I came up with. Doing the whole thing in braided line and fitting was just too expensive. The fittings are big $$$s. I decided to do it in a combination of aluminum fuel line and socketless hose. The hose is actually just going to be from the firewall to about 6" out so that there is enough slack for the motor to torque. The rest will be aluminum fuel line with AN fittings (Tube Nuts/Sleeves), going to a AN fuel pressure gauge adapter, and then a AN to Pipe adapter into the injection. The return line will not have the pressure gauge adapter. I am planning to polish the aluminum line so it should look sharp and be safe. This is only from the firewall up to the injection. Back to the tank is regular steel line. I found a place with excellent prices on Aeroquip fittings. www.racehose.com I compared what I bought to Summit and it was over 30% less or you could say that Summit was about 50% more, depends on how you look at it. They also had a larger selection of fittings.
IP: Logged |
Dr. Who Gearhead Posts: 164 From: Redwood City, Ca. Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted 10-17-2001 04:09 PM
Be sure the aluminum can't shake or move, it can (and will) crack very easy if it works at all.
IP: Logged |
JAAZZY Gearhead Posts: 772 From: Bay Area, CA Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 10-17-2001 04:25 PM
That's one of the things I'll look into. I will increase the length of the socketless hose enough to isolate the aluminum. It will move with the motor but it won't have any stress on it when it does.Do you think it would be better to put the Aeroquip hose on both ends of the aluminum? I mean from the injection to the aluminum and then from the aluminum to the firewall. That might isolate it even more. quote: Originally posted by Dr. Who: Be sure the aluminum can't shake or move, it can (and will) crack very easy if it works at all.
IP: Logged |
Ryan Wilke Gearhead Posts: 2047 From: Stanton, Michigan 49707 Registered: Oct 2000
|
posted 10-21-2001 12:13 AM
quote: Originally posted by Dan warren: ...Cheep insuranse.Ps Co2 extinguisers are expensive but they dont leave the white residue in your car. Dan
Dan, You are correct in that a CO2 (carbon dioxide) extinguisher doesn't leave any residue and are pricey when compared to the dry chemical units. But the downside is that they are not very small and, thus, most folks wouldn't want to carry such a bulky extinguisher in their car. They are, however, a GREAT choice to have standing ready in your garage!
IP: Logged |
Ryan Wilke Gearhead Posts: 2047 From: Stanton, Michigan 49707 Registered: Oct 2000
|
posted 10-21-2001 12:42 AM
quote: Originally posted by RonnieT: Check into the type of extinguisher you buy. Make sure it is a ABC fire extinguisher. Some of them are only good for 1 type of fire and will not do you much good for a gas fire. The dry chemical is about the best small extinguisher you can get for any vehicle fire. A Halon extinguisher is very good, but they are expensive and I hink they may be hard to find.
RonnnieT: You bring out a good point. Typically, the dry chemical units are rated for "A, B & C" fires and will be the cheapest around. But, they are all coorosive. Another downside to them is that if you don't 'inspect/service' them every couple of months; they can "pack" and not even work if you wanted it to - even if the gage stills reads in the green! The Halon units are way, way too expensive (but no residue). There is a Halon-replacement material available, but not widely known and isn't much cheaper. Both are available in the smaller sizes, and are typically the units of choice in computer rooms - due to no coorosive residue. The CO2 units are only rated for "B,C" fires (fuels, oils, greases, plastics and electrical fires). The 'A' rating means the unit is also good for paper and wood fires. So, for most automotive shops, the "B, C"-rated CO2 extinguishers are preferred and work just fine. Lastly,,, typically the units with a metal head can be serviced and refilled; whereas the plastic-headed units are typically throwaway units. So if I had a fire going on in my garage or in the pits at the track, I'd use my CO2 unit on it first, then if necessary, I'd follow it up with a dry chemical unit, which is probably what the track has on hand. -- Eventhough it's a coorosive material; you gotta get the fire out!
IP: Logged |
cynot65 Gearhead Posts: 1177 From: New York Registered: Apr 2000
|
posted 10-22-2001 05:29 PM
I'm picking up an extinguisher this weekend....and my car's not even finished yet!!!! Thanks for the wake up call and all the advice Tony C* ------------------ 65 Convertible 289 4spd M&M Member#450 It ain't done yet, but it'll be done right!!
IP: Logged |
sigtauenus Gearhead Posts: 2180 From: Far East, currently in Japan Registered: Jun 2000
|
posted 10-22-2001 09:31 PM
quote: Originally posted by Ryan Wilke: You bring out a good point. Typically, the dry chemical units are rated for "A, B & C" fires and will be the cheapest around. But, they are all coorosive. Another downside to them is that if you don't 'inspect/service' them every couple of months; they can "pack" and not even work if you wanted it to - even if the gage stills reads in the green!
I did a search on yahoo for auto fire extinguishers and found some priced around $30-70 that were sodium bicarbonate based (baking soda) and it said that wasn't corrosive. Is that stuff different from the dry chemical extinguishers that you guys are referring to that is corrosive? Anybody know for sure? BTW, I found a source for halon, 2.5 lbs, $105-$135. Might be worth the money compared to cleanup and corrosiveness of the dry chemical types, and if the baking soda one turns out to be corrosive too.
IP: Logged |
Ryan Wilke Gearhead Posts: 2047 From: Stanton, Michigan 49707 Registered: Oct 2000
|
posted 10-23-2001 02:52 PM
quote: Originally posted by sigtauenus: ...that were sodium bicarbonate based (baking soda) and it said that wasn't corrosive. Is that stuff different from the dry chemical extinguishers that you guys are referring to that is corrosive?Anybody know for sure? BTW, I found a source for halon, 2.5 lbs, $105-$135. Might be worth the money compared to cleanup and corrosiveness of the dry chemical types, and if the baking soda one turns out to be corrosive too.
Sig: According to the Material Safety Data Sheet (provided by the manufacturer, Badger Inc., Charlottesville, Virginia, 434-973-4361) the sodium bicarbonate extinguishing agent is "slightly corrosive". So, I'd guess that baking soda is less coorosive than what is typically loaded into most "ABC" fire extinguishers, ammonium phosphate. Thus, the sodium bicarbonate unit may be a better alternative to the expensive Halon or a larger CO2 extinguishers. Bottomline - Whatever you do - #1) Have ANY TYPE of a working extingusher accessible (you don't want to have to HUNT for it while your car is burning down) in your garage and take it to the race track when you go (unless you are parked right next to your track's "Safety Station"). #2) Learn how to inspect/check the unit correctly twice a year; that way you'll KNOW it'll work when/if you need it. I have two teenage boys. I started two pallets on fire in the driveway and had them put the fire out. Yeah,it cost me to have my 10-lb CO2 and 10-lb dry chemical extinguisher re-filled, but I wanted them to know EXACTLY how to use a fire extinguisher. Even if there is a fire is at their school, a friends house, or wherever...they'd be the HERO by acting rather than 'reading the directions' while a fire raged on..... .....maybe they'd even save someone or themselves from needing multiple skin grafts... :/ Ryan P.S. Regardless of the size of town you live in - stop by your local fire dept. and ask about possible practice training excerises that you & your family could attend. If they don't, go to your next Township Meeting and ask if such a hands-on session could be 'budgeted' into their 2002 calendar.
IP: Logged |
richard bohm Gearhead Posts: 373 From: tucson,az-luray,va Registered: May 2001
|
posted 10-24-2001 12:07 AM
to all you fine gentlemen(and any ladies also) i have had experience with the halon fire extinguishers and they work great, dont leave a residue, and you can plumb the system so you can leave the unit bolted down and just pull a pin to release the the gas. yes it is expensive but overall cheap insurance in case of fire, and you dont have the clean up aggrivation to go through. jazzy i hope your mustan gcomes back better than ever. use the stainless steel tubing in 3/8 diameter, and use either the areoquip pushlok or braided high pressure fuel hose when you redo the fuel system. oh the reason i recomend plumbing the fire system into the car is speed. you dont have to get the unit then open the hood then use the system(tough way to go when you are excited).
IP: Logged |
Dr. Who Gearhead Posts: 164 From: Redwood City, Ca. Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted 10-24-2001 01:14 AM
The other reason for plumbing the system is opening the hood! Many times you can get real well baked when popping the hood. I have a small Halon in a bicycle water bottle mount, not race approved cause if I turn the car over it would be running around with the CDs, coffee cup and whatever parts and tools or luggage might be in the car with me at the time, but it's easy to get out . If the fire's under my hood I'll have to find a stick or something to push the hood up while I stay as low as I can get. Fire is not friendly and I'm darn near bald now, fire would take away what few hairs I got left LOL.
IP: Logged |
Ryan Wilke Gearhead Posts: 2047 From: Stanton, Michigan 49707 Registered: Oct 2000
|
posted 10-25-2001 05:46 PM
(Although I've never had to try it so I don't know how well this works) In the case of an under-the-hood fire, I've been told to blast your extinguisher THRU the grill / radiator opening first; then open the hood to finish the job.... makes some sense to me.Ryan
IP: Logged |
sigtauenus Gearhead Posts: 2180 From: Far East, currently in Japan Registered: Jun 2000
|
posted 10-26-2001 03:34 PM
I went to the local fire department to ask about different extinguishers and they referred me to a guy at Jorgensen (they sell extinguishers). The guy recommended the dry chemical and here's what he said about my corrosion concerns. He said that although the chemical is corrosive, its not immediate or really that strong. His van was covered in the stuff (he is in a mobile unit that refills extinguishers on-site) and he says he cleans the van about every 3-4 months and there's no sign of corrosion problems on his van. Next, I told him about the 2.5 lb halon bottle, and he said 1), the price was too high ($135), I should only be paying about $16/pound plus the bottle, and 2), a 2.5 lb bottle of Halon would be useless if my car caught on fire. He said I would need at least a 5 lb bottle of Halon to equal the 2.5lb bottle of dry chemical. Halon is really good, but you need more of it. My decision is I'd rather put the fire out and worry about cleaning it up on the back side than have to have a big bottle of halon or not have enough halon to do the job. So, I bought a 2.5 lb bottle, its made by Badger and is all metal, ie no plastic, and he said to have it inspected/refilled about every 2-3 years because of the chemical becoming packed. Cost was about $23 including tax. Oh yeah, it has an ABC rating.
IP: Logged |
Dr. Who Gearhead Posts: 164 From: Redwood City, Ca. Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted 10-26-2001 09:53 PM
Thanks sigtauenus! I guess my little halon is only good for decoration. I'll mount it on my minibike and get a grown up unit for the car .
IP: Logged |
289 Rod Journeyman Posts: 63 From: Laguna Niguel, CA, USA Registered: Oct 2001
|
posted 10-27-2001 03:30 AM
Gees...That sounds bad. At least you did not ruin the car making it a total loss. I recently lost my first 65 Mustang to an accident. I was driving late at night in the lane closest to the center divider and hydro-planed on some water which redirected my car towards the center divider. I hit it at about 50 mph. I ruined a 1 year old set of Gone In 60 Second Halibrand Wheels and the frame. Luckily the insurance covered the accident and the police officer did not put me at fault for the accident. Plus no one else was on the road and I did not get any injuries amazingly.
IP: Logged |
Mike65 Gearhead Posts: 2013 From: Bloomfield, NY, USA. Western Finger Lakes, 65 Fastback, 69 Coupe MCA #-04549 Registered: Dec 2000
|
posted 10-27-2001 04:24 PM
Hey JAZ glad all turned out ok & you or the car wasnt seriously hurt.------------------ Mike & Robin 65 Mustang Fastback 69 Mustang Coupe 87 LTD CV 96 Ranger Extd Cab PU 99 Explorer Sport M&M #- 890 MCA #- 04549
IP: Logged |