Author
|
Topic: which carb
|
indyphil Gearhead Posts: 3394 From: Senoia, G.A. USA Registered: JUL 2002
|
posted 09-18-2002 04:27 PM
Im almost done with the necessary chassis work and have been thinking a lot about engine mods. Next couple of months I may be spending up to 500 bucks on my 289 2V.Im lost in all the types and makes of intakes and carbs, and terrified of getting something that is unreliable. Id rather have my reliable 2 barrel than a pain in the @$$ 4 barrel. I do want a 4 barrel system, and am happy spending that $500 on an intake and carb. So can I rely on you guys to give me your opinions on Holley Vs Edlebrock Vs Demon Vs Autolite? I will need an intake to go with it, and am looking at trying to make 300hp street engine. (I will eventually get a new cam and headers, but I am thinking about the carb and intake first). The general feeling I get is that edelbrock is less powerful but more reliable? Autolite are great but expensive? I would buy second hand, but Im worried about reliability, and my budget allows new. Thanks, you guys are great ------------------ '68 coupe 289 2V CAT engine performance engineer
|
indyphil Gearhead Posts: 3394 From: Senoia, G.A. USA Registered: JUL 2002
|
posted 09-18-2002 04:30 PM
As it stands I am heading towards a holley DoublePumper600CFM and an edelbrock performer RPM intake. Do I need electric or manual choke? What about my automatic C-4 transmission does that matter to the carb?Thanks again!! I know you guys love talking about carbs!!
|
mustangs68 Moderator Posts: 27681 From: Hampton Va MCA#39406 M&M #12 Member Mustang Club of Tidewater Registered: MAY 99
|
posted 09-18-2002 04:36 PM
For street and ez of use I vote Edlebrock.I have one on the Fb and have never touched it nor had a problem..now if you going for max HP or Racing use the Holley..but for the Avg. streeter the Edlebrock is my choice. Oh and I have a Performer RPM under it. sam [This message has been edited by mustangs68 (edited 09-18-2002).]
|
johnmustang Gearhead Posts: 6748 From: British Columbia , Canada Registered: NOV 2001
|
posted 09-18-2002 04:52 PM
Had nothing buy trouble with my holley , 3 of them were bad out of the box. Went back to the autolite 4100 1.08 venturi. JOHN ------------------ 65 2+2 FASTBACK 68 COUPE 87 TAURUS WAGON 98 F150 XLT TRITON V8 4.6, 4 WHEEL DRIVE Member:Vancouver Island Mustang Association M&M #1710 MyPhotoPage MY TRUCK
|
indyphil Gearhead Posts: 3394 From: Senoia, G.A. USA Registered: JUL 2002
|
posted 09-18-2002 05:04 PM
I can see that the basic sense that holleys can be trouble but they make good power is true. I may avoid them then. 300hp should be possible with edelbrock, so long as everything else works good right?I guess the unkown is the driveability aspect, does it go when I press the loud pedal. Pierre over there in France seemed to think that his holley hauled @$$ while his edelbrock left him scratching his 'ed. I hear a lot of people that tell me that they never seemed to get more than a couple of runs out of the holley before something broke or leaked. thats not what im looking for. anybody use the new street avenger?
|
Moneymaker Administrator Posts: 29200 From: Lyons, IL, USA Registered: MAY 99
|
posted 09-18-2002 05:14 PM
Stock or near stock 289...Autolite 4100= Holley 4150 or 4160= Jimmy Carter Edelpuke=
------------------ Alex Denysenko Co-Administrator and Moderator/ non 65-66 Mustang owner sensitivity co-ordinator NHRA/IHRA/SRA/MCA member NHRA and IHRA SS/LA National Record Holder '00, '01, & '02 Fleet of FoMoCo products including 88 ASC McLaren Mustang #28 Part time secret agent license #0089 Professional Manwhore The Barry of BarrysGrrl Quote: "I never met a magazine mechanic I liked."
|
johnmustang Gearhead Posts: 6748 From: British Columbia , Canada Registered: NOV 2001
|
posted 09-18-2002 06:49 PM
indyphil, I have a autolite with the 1.12 venturi , which was used on the 289 hipo , that I may be selling very shortly , it will need a rebuild or I can rebuild it before I sell it , let me know if you have any interest in it. JOHN ------------------ 65 2+2 FASTBACK 68 COUPE 87 TAURUS WAGON 98 F150 XLT TRITON V8 4.6, 4 WHEEL DRIVE Member:Vancouver Island Mustang Association M&M #1710 MyPhotoPage MY TRUCK
|
Square Pants Journeyman Posts: 35 From: Phoenix, AZ Registered: AUG 2002
|
posted 09-18-2002 09:06 PM
I have been doing a lot of looking around for a good carb/intake combo too and I've been leaning towards a Holley Street Avenger carb and a Weiand X-elerator intake.The carb is supposed to have all the power that Holley is famous for along with the ease of mainenance that Edelbrock is known for. As far as the Weiand intake... well with a 351-2V, I'm kind of limited on my choices... It's either that or the Edelbrock performer intake. ------------------ -Lee 73 Convertible, 351C-2V, FMX, Headers and Dual Exhaust And saving up for the next project...
|
Daniel Jones Gearhead Posts: 972 From: St. Louis, MO Registered: AUG 99
|
posted 09-19-2002 12:53 PM
>I've been leaning towards a Holley Street Avenger carb... The carb is >supposed to have all the power that Holley is famous for along with >the ease of maintenance that Edelbrock is known for.Hmmm, the Street Avenger is just a typical Holley with few optional features (center pivot floats, power valve blow out protection, quick change kit for the vacuum secondary springs, etc.). It's a good carb but you still have to pull the bowls off to change the jets or power valves and the air bleeds and power valve channel restrictors are still fixed area. Also, the potential for leaks is still there due to the modular body plus metering blocks plus bowls design (the vertical gaskets can dry out and shrink over time, causing leaks). The newer red Holley gaskets should be much better than the old paper gaskets, in that regard, but you'll need to verify Holley actually uses those gaskets in the particular carb you want (some do, some don't). The 4010 Holleys were much like an Autolite 4100 and had a one piece main body with top lid and were, by design, much less likely to leak but Holley dropped that line of carbs. Autolites and AFB's are also less likely to leak due to their design. The AFB's also allow easier fuel enrichment and jet changes (no disassembly required). There are kits that allow Holley jet changes without disassembly but your still stuck pulling the bowls to change power valves. >As far as the Weiand intake... well with a 351C-2V, I'm kind of limited >on my choices... It's either that or the Edelbrock performer intake. The Weiand Xcelerator for the 351C-2V works just fine, particulary with some compression (I run Aussie 2V heads to get the compression up) and cam. You must port match the heads to the intake though, as the Xcelerator has larger ports than the head. This is best done with the heads off the engine but I have done it on an assembled long block. I stuffed a bit of newspaper in each port, near the valve guide, then sealed off the port with modeling clay. The clay keeps any grindings out of the enigne and the newspaper keeps the clay from pushing too far back in the port. A valley cover made out of cardboard, taped to the block, will keep that area clean. I had an assistant stand over me with a shop vacuum which realy helped to keep the grindings down. After I was finished, we wiped everything down and removed the clay and installed the intake. If you use a valley pan gasket, you'll need to trim that too using a dremel. After a few hours of run time, I did an oil and filter change, just to be safe. Dan Jones
|
Mpcoluv Gearhead Posts: 1421 From: Charlotte NC usa Registered: APR 2001
|
posted 09-19-2002 01:46 PM
You mean my new-in-box 750 Annular may still have the paper gaskets? Da*n Holley is stupid.... I guess I had better pull it apart and check. AED (an aftermarket Holley parts outfit) has re-usable blue gaskets that local racers use also, and they are cheaper than Holley gaskets.------------------ Jim Sams '69 mustang Coupe 372C
|
69 Sportsroof Gearhead Posts: 2814 From: Valley, Alabama, USA Registered: MAR 2002
|
posted 09-19-2002 02:28 PM
The biggest problem with carbs is that folks think bigger is better. This is absolutely not the case. If your 289 is stock, you definately do not need a double pumper carb. In fact, you'll only need a max of about 500 cfm at WOT with your engine and that's after you add headers. The Holley 1850 (600 cfm) universal carb will work fine on your current engine. You'll also get better throttle response from a Performer intake, not the RPM version as it raises the useful RPM range.
|
Daniel Jones Gearhead Posts: 972 From: St. Louis, MO Registered: AUG 99
|
posted 09-19-2002 03:00 PM
>You mean my new-in-box 750 Annular may still have the paper gaskets? >Da*n Holley is stupid....Unfortunately, yes. Dan Jones
|
Moneymaker Administrator Posts: 29200 From: Lyons, IL, USA Registered: MAY 99
|
posted 09-19-2002 03:32 PM
Not really, they are very smart. That way they get you to buy more gaskets. ------------------ Alex Denysenko Co-Administrator and Moderator/ non 65-66 Mustang owner sensitivity co-ordinator NHRA/IHRA/SRA/MCA member NHRA and IHRA SS/LA National Record Holder '00, '01, & '02 Fleet of FoMoCo products including 88 ASC McLaren Mustang #28 Part time secret agent license #0089 Professional Manwhore The Barry of BarrysGrrl Quote: "I never met a magazine mechanic I liked."
|
indyphil Gearhead Posts: 3394 From: Senoia, G.A. USA Registered: JUL 2002
|
posted 09-20-2002 09:06 AM
My 289 is stock now, but it wont be in the future. I understand that big carbs and RPM intakes might not work great straight away but I cant afford everything in the first month. I have to pace myself. I dont want to buy anything twice. I am really leaning towards an autolite, but if the edelbrock is a capable carb for 300hp then i may go that way. You guys have scared me off holley for the time being.Thanks ------------------ '68 coupe 289 2V CAT engine performance engineer
|
mustangzrule Journeyman Posts: 87 From: Orion, MI Registered: SEP 2002
|
posted 09-20-2002 10:41 AM
I use Edelbrock because I got a deal on the intake/carb combo. The tuning capabilities are a little weak, but it works pretty good on my combo.408W 750CFM electric choke Vic Jr intake Stage 3 Pref RPM heads Long tube headers into 3" C4 Makes about 400HP with a goal of 500HP when I get the MSD on it.
|
69 Sportsroof Gearhead Posts: 2814 From: Valley, Alabama, USA Registered: MAR 2002
|
posted 09-20-2002 02:07 PM
Be sure and check ebay for parts to begin with. You can pick up a used carb and intake fairly cheap and when you get ready to upgrade, sell your old stuff. You can get intakes and carbs all day for $100 or less each. A $19 rebuild kit and a $3 can of aluminum spray paint later and you'll be showin and shinin.
|
ice'68 Gearhead Posts: 127 From: Fresno, CA Registered: APR 2002
|
posted 09-20-2002 10:38 PM
What do you guys recommend for a 351W that's a little hopped up (280H cam,9.5:1 Pistons)? I heard that you could get away with the 600, but that sounds a little under-carburated for me.
|
mustangs68 Moderator Posts: 27681 From: Hampton Va MCA#39406 M&M #12 Member Mustang Club of Tidewater Registered: MAY 99
|
posted 09-21-2002 02:31 PM
LOL..see the little bar on the right isde of you monitior screen..that a scroll bar..SCROLL DOWN..LOL....Yes it's been finished since 1999. 289 30 over 10:1 compression Comp 270 H cam.Hooker Headers E-brock 600cfm,Performer 289 intake Roller rockers,Windsor Jr heads MSD IGN System,and a bunch more I done forgot TCI C-4 Tranny.. and very strong 279 gears While in the Shop it sat next to a AC Cobra once owned by Mr Shellby.#3 in production and a 65 Shelby also once own by him. sam
|
V8 Thumper Gearhead Posts: 4777 From: Phoenix, Arizona Registered: DEC 2001
|
posted 09-21-2002 09:59 PM
780 List# 3310-1, 4150 w/ vaccum secondaries... that's how I can get away with it. A dp of similar size would be too much for a smallblock IMHO
|
indyphil Gearhead Posts: 3394 From: Senoia, G.A. USA Registered: JUL 2002
|
posted 09-23-2002 08:23 AM
Thanks for all the thoughts. Funny thing happened. While I was under the car I this weekend I think I decided to go with a dual exhaust and headers first, then maybe do the intake and carb stuff sometime in the winter. It will probably end up being edelbrock or autolite, I've been hearing too many bad things about holley for street use. Now, headman long tubes, or tri-Y?
|
RonnieT Gearhead Posts: 912 From: Port Allen, La. 70767 Registered: JUN 99
|
posted 09-23-2002 10:28 PM
I am (was) running a 750 Edel on my 351. I put it on to replace my old 4160 Holley, only because it was the only thing I could find locally except another 4160, which I did not want. Looking back on it I wish I would have waited on a holley. The finish on the Edel has spotted and looks bad. One thing to look out for with the Edel is the carbs are jetted different depending on if you order it with a manual or electric choke. The manual choke model is jetted much richer.------------------ Ronnie 69 mach1 351W-4V engineless at the time! 70 Torino GT 351C-4v with a "shaker" Mustangs and More Member #23
|
indyphil Gearhead Posts: 3394 From: Senoia, G.A. USA Registered: JUL 2002
|
posted 09-25-2002 10:47 AM
I also have been looking at the barry grant road demon. So anybody out there have opinions on them? They look good but cost a fair amount for a street carb.I will almost certainly be doing the exhuast first I found my poorly fitted single exhaust system rubs on the driveshaft and the shock absorber. I already patched one hole in it at the Y section. Its time to make some sweet noises
|
mustangboy Gearhead Posts: 1343 From: Ont, Canada Registered: MAR 2002
|
posted 09-25-2002 11:19 AM
Its a good idea to go with a good exhaust system first,thats always a huge help on a Ford.And the type of tranny you have DOES matter as you will need a hookup for your passing gear kick down if you are running an automatic.I would also use a vacuum secondary for automatic and a DP for a stick.I will also vote for the Holley,I have used several over the years and never had any trouble with them,.but a good inline fuel filter is a must.------------------ 1968 mustang j-code sprint.13.69@101 1963Falcon waiting for a rebirth.
|
Clark Gearhead Posts: 749 From: Rowlett,Texas Registered: AUG 99
|
posted 09-25-2002 12:13 PM
My decision came down to a Street Avenger or the Demon and I went with a Demon 625 for $325. A little more than the Avenger but the quality sure looks good on the Demon, Have not installed it yet but will be soon. ------------------ 69 351W Sportsroof Deluxe
|