Brought to you in part by:

.


NOTICE! The old Mustangsandmore.com is a read-only archive.
Currently the Search function is inoperative, but we are working on the problem.

Please join us at our NEW Mustangsandmore.com forums located at this location.
Please notice this is a brand new message board, and you must re-register to gain access.


Note: This is an archived topic. It is read-only.
  Mustangsandmore Forum Archive
  Manual Transmissions
  4 speed questions

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!

profile | register | preferences | faq | search



This topic was originally posted in this forum: '64 1/2 to '68 1/2 -- The Classic Mustang
Author Topic:   4 speed questions
Wicked-Toy
Gearhead

Posts: 252
From: Richmond, VA USA
Registered: JUN 99

posted 10-30-2000 04:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Wicked-Toy     
More questions concerning conversion of
a c-4 to a toploader in my 65. First will
the c4 trans crosmember work with the toploader. Second will the current spacer plate between engine and tran work. Third,
will stick shift clutch brake pedals work in the same under dash bracket as the automatic. ie. Do I need to change the support bracket or just install pedals in the bracket that is in the car.
Anyone with some experience in this ???

------------------
Scott Akom
65 Coupe (Modified)
68 Coupe (Son's)
2000 GT Conv. (Wifes)
[URL=http://www.geocities.com/motorcity/flats/3845/65dsde2.jpg
www.mustangsandmore.com/ubb/WickedToy.html


SteveLaRiviere
Administrator

Posts: 48752
From: Saco, Maine
Registered: MAY 99

posted 10-30-2000 05:05 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SteveLaRiviere     
I know you'll need the standard pedal hangers, the geometry is different.

The engine plate is different from standard to automatic.

------------------
SteveLaRiviere/Webmaster -- MCA # 47773


Moneymaker
Administrator

Posts: 29200
From: Lyons, IL, USA
Registered: MAY 99

posted 10-31-2000 03:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Moneymaker     
The crossmember is the same for stick or automatic on 65-68 Mustangs except for the C-6 big block cars. The only differance between the block plates (V-8's) is the starter hole. You can cut and splice it to make it work as they are getting hard to come by and rather pricey. Alex

------------------
Alex Denysenko Co-Administrator and Moderator
Fleet of FoMoCo's too long to list!
http://superstockers.homestead.com/week.html


kcode
Gearhead

Posts: 3415
From: alvaton,ky,usa Suburb of Bowling Green, M&M #79, MCA #29208
Registered: JUN 99

posted 10-30-2000 11:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for kcode     
Scott,
the pedal support of a manual shift has an extra clutch stop bolted to the side and it has a clutch spring bracket bolted to the front close to the steering column, other than that they are the same. If you can find any manual donor would be the best way. As they said previously, the cross member is the same, even the trans mount is the same. The spacer plate is tricky if you don't watch. The 302 from 68 up used a wider plate and bell housing for the 164 tooth flywheel. 65-66 used the 157 tooth and narrow plate and flywheel. I did some comparisons between starters, manual vs auto. It seems that the automatic bendix sticks out farther at rest than the manual. I spent a hour or so at the parts counter of AutoZone comparing them. Does the thickness of the flywheel vs flexplate constitute this, I don't know, just an observation.
Good luck,
Mike


68fb
Journeyman

Posts: 42
From: LakeStevens, Wa. USA
Registered: OCT 2000

posted 10-31-2000 07:21 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for 68fb     
You are absolutely correct. The bendix is longer on a starter designed for an automatic trans. The difference: ringgear distance aft of the crank flange, flexplate vs. flywheel


Wicked-Toy
Gearhead

Posts: 252
From: Richmond, VA USA
Registered: JUN 99

posted 10-31-2000 07:30 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Wicked-Toy     
I guess I should have provided a little more
info as the engine in the car is a 77 or 78
302. The starter I am currently running
is from a 80's 5.0 and is physically smaller
and more powerful. Do you think it will
work ?? Thanks for the info so far.

------------------
Scott Akom
65 Coupe (Modified)
68 Coupe (Son's)
2000 GT Conv. (Wifes)
[URL=http://www.geocities.com/motorcity/flats/3845/65dsde2.jpg
www.mustangsandmore.com/ubb/WickedToy.html


Moneymaker
Administrator

Posts: 29200
From: Lyons, IL, USA
Registered: MAY 99

posted 10-31-2000 12:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Moneymaker     
I minor clarification is needed here. ALL 65-68 small block Mustangs/Cougars had a 157 tooth small bell housing and flywheel. Most of the intermidiates and compacts(Fairlanes/Comets/Falcons) did also. By mid 1968 as the 250 six became more popular, the larger bell housing began finding it's way into the intermidiates. The full size cars and light trucks with 302's or 240 six cylinders from 1968 up began to use the larger 164 tooth flywheel and coresponding bell housing. The larger bell housing and flywheel was not installed behind small blocks or 250's in the smaller cars untill 1969. The small unit was discontinued after 1968 which is making it increasingly difficult to obtain both for stick or auto. Note: I am always seeking small C-4 bell housings. Alex

------------------
Alex Denysenko Co-Administrator and Moderator
Fleet of FoMoCo's too long to list!
http://superstockers.homestead.com/week.html


All times are ET (US)

This is an ARCHIVED topic. You may not reply to it!
Hop to:

Contact Us | Mustangsandmore Front Page

Copyright 2006, Steve LaRiviere. All Rights Reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47d

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

[Members' Pics]

[Tech Articles]